Advertisement

Social Theory & Health

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 162–179 | Cite as

Diagnosis at work – On sick leave in Sweden

  • Lena Eriksson
Original Article

Abstract

The article explores how understandings of patients with symptom diagnoses, notably fibromyalgia, are shaped by the introduction of a new medical decision-making support tool used to assess patients’ ’work capacity’, together with a revision of the Swedish social insurance. Findings from two recently concluded empirical studies are used to demonstrate how notions of ’the social’ are mobilised to undercut patients’ claims to medical legitimacy and right to sick benefits. Interviews with medical professionals, civil servants and social insurance case officers indicate that fibromyalgia patients’ clinical narratives should demonstrate ordered social circumstances if their symptoms are to be categorised as belonging to a ’medical’ sphere and thus fall within the remit of the social insurance. The main determinant in this categorisation was if patients were thought to be capable of functioning in a workplace. The workplace as constituted through the interviews was a site that removed patients from the perilous domain of ’social circumstances’ and placed them in an arena in which their symptoms, while still unsignified, could be understood as affecting ’work capacity’.

Keywords

fibromyalgia sociology of diagnosis sick leave work capacity contested illnesses 

References

  1. Alexandersson, K. et al (2009) Läkares arbete med sjukskrivning. En enkät till alla läkare i Sverige 2008; utveckling sedan 2004 i Östergötland och Stockholm. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet.Google Scholar
  2. Anspach, R. (2011) Preface. In: P.J. McGann and D.J. Hutson (eds.) Sociology of Diagnosis. Advances in Medical Sociology, Vol. 12. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, pp. xiii–xxvii.Google Scholar
  3. Aronowitz, R.A. (2001) When do symptoms become a disease? Ann Intern Med 34 (9): 803–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, P. (1988) Discourse, descriptions and diagnoses: Reproducing normal medicine. In: M. Lock and D. Gordon (eds.) Biomedicine Examined. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, P. (1995) Naming and framing: The social construction of diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 35 (extra issue): 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, P. and Zavestoski, S. (2004) Social movements in health: An introduction. Sociology of Health and Illness 26 (6): 679–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (eds.) (1994) Developments in qualitative data analysis: An introduction. In: Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiong, W. (2001) Diagnosing and defining disease. JAMA 285 (1): 89–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conrad, P. (2002) A mirage of genes. In: S. Nettleton and U. Gustafsson (eds.) The Sociology of Health and Illness Reader. Cambridge, UK: Polity, pp. 76–87.Google Scholar
  10. Conrad, P. (2007) The Medicalization of Society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  11. Conrad, P. and Schneider, J.W. (1992) Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness (Expanded edn). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  12. De Swaan, A. (1989) The reluctant imperialism of the medical profession. Social Science and Medicine 28 (11): 1165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dubos, R. (1959) Mirage of Health. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  14. Dumit, J. (2006) Illnesses you have to fight to get: Facts and forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses. Social Science and Medicine 62 (3): 577–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engel, G.L. (1981) The need for a new medical model: A challenge to bio-medicine. In: A.L. Kaplan, H.T. Engelhardt and J.J. McCartney (eds.) Concepts of Health and Disease: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Addison-Wesley, pp. 589–608.Google Scholar
  16. Eriksson, L., Sager, M., Staland-Nyman, C. and Hensing, G. (2014a) Kunskap och bedömningar i sjukskrivning: En vetenskapsteoretisk studie av det försäkringsmedicinska beslutsstödet. Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 91 (4): 332–338.Google Scholar
  17. Eriksson, L., Sager, M., Staland-Nyman, C. and Hensing, G. (2014b) Expertis, sjukskrivning och mötet mellan normal och post-normal vetenskap. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift 21 (2): 70–84.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1973) Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1978) The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  20. Frank, A. (1995) The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness and Ethics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freidson, E. (1970) Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  22. Furedi, F. (2006) The end of professional dominance. Society 43 (6): 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  24. Hadler, N.M. (1996) If you have to prove you are ill, you can’t get well. The object lesson of fibromyalgia. Spine 21 (20): 2397–2400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P.A. (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hunter, K.M. (1991) Doctors’ Stories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jutel, A. (2009) Sociology of diagnosis: A preliminary review. Sociology of Health and Illness 31 (2): 278–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jutel, A. (2011) Putting a Name to It: Diagnosis in Contemporary Society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Leder, D. (1990) Clinical interpretation: The hermeneutics of medicine. Theoretical Medicine 11 (1): 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lillrank, A. (2003) Back pain and the resolution of of diagnostic uncertainty in illness narratives. Social Science and Medicine 57 (6): 1045–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGann, P. (2011) Troubling diagnoses. In: P. McGann and D.J. Hutson (eds.) Sociology of Diagnosis. Advances in Medical Sociology, Vol. 12. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 331–362.Google Scholar
  32. Malterud, K. (2001) Subjective symptoms without objective findings – A challenge for theory and practice of general medicine. Ugeskr Laeger 163 (48): 6729–6734.Google Scholar
  33. Malterud, K. (2005) Humiliation instead of care? Lancet 9488 (366): 785–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nettleton, S., OMalley, L., Watt, I. and Duffey, P. (2004) Enigmatic illness: Narratives of patients who live with medically unexplained symptoms. Social Theory & Health 2 (1): 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nettleton, S., Watt, I., O’Malley, L. and Duffey, P. (2005) Understanding the narratives of people who live with medically unexplained illness. Patient Education and Counselling 56 (2): 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nettleton, S. (2006) ‘I just want permission to be ill’: Towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms. Social Science and Medicine 62 (5): 1167–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Parsons, T. (1979) Definitions of health and illness in the light of American values and social structure. In: E. Jaco and E. Gartley (eds.) Patients, Physicians and Illness: A Source Book in Behavioural Scince and Health, 3rd edn. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Prop. (1994/95) 147 Rätten till förtidspension och sjukpenning samt folkpension för gift, http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Forslag/Propositioner-och-skrivelser/prop-199495147-Ratten-till-f_GI03147/, accessed 25 March 2014.
  40. Rose, N. and Miller, P. (2008) Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, S. (2006) Sociology of Health and Illness 28 (2): 133–153.Google Scholar
  42. Statens Offentliga Utredningar (Swedish government official reports). (1995) Försäkringsskydd vid Sjukdom. SOU 1995: 149. Socialdepartementet. ISBN: 91-38-20148-8.Google Scholar
  43. Svensk författningssamling Lag (1995) om ändring i lagen (1962:381) om allmän försäkring:508.Google Scholar
  44. Turner, B.S. (1992) Regulating Bodies: Essays in Medical Sociology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner, B.S. (1995) Medical Power and Social Knowledge, 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Vahlne Westerhäll, L. (ed.) (2008) Det sjukförsäkringsrättsliga arbetsoförmågebegreppet I lagstiftning och rättstillämpning. In: Arbets(o)förmåga – ur ett mångdisciplinärt perspektiv. Stockholm, Sweden: Santérus.Google Scholar
  47. Vahlne Westerhäll, L., Thorpenberg, S. and Jonasson, M.J. (2009) Läkarintyget i sjukskrivningsprocessen: Styrning, legitimitet och bevisning. Stockholm, Sweden: Santérus.Google Scholar
  48. Zavetoski, S., Brown, P., McCormick, S., Mayer, B., D’Ottawi, M. and Lucove, J.C. (2004) Patient activism and the struggle for diagnosis: Gulf war illnesses and other medically unexplained physical symptoms in the US. Social Science & Medicine 58 (1): 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lena Eriksson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyLinguistics and Theory of Science, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations