Social Theory & Health

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 159–178 | Cite as

Relative bodies of knowledge: Therapeutic dualism and maternal–foetal individuation

Original Article

Abstract

A strong body of knowledge attests to the fact that Australian women are using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) at increasing rates. However, use of CAM in the context of maternity care is variable and distinctive because of heightened sensitivity to risk and the complexities that arise in managing maternal and foetal well-being concurrently. Drawing on qualitative interviews with 40 women who had recently given birth residing in a major city in Australia, we trace their use of CAM and biomedicine through a sequence of important health-care events during their pregnancies and up until the point of labour. We show that these women’s engagement with CAM and biomedicine depicts a pattern whereby CAM is used to ensure the women’s well-being while biomedicine is used to ensure a safe and healthy baby. We employ the concept of therapeutic dualism to analyse how this form of medical pluralism reproduces contemporary forms of pregnant embodiment – specifically the ontological separation of mother and foetus. However, we also highlight how this dualism is inexact. That is, bodies of medical knowledge may be separated and combined at specific points during pregnancy, and so too can the foetal and maternal body.

Keywords

therapeutic pluralism embodiment pregnancy complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is based on research conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, the University of Newcastle and the University of Queensland. We are grateful to the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing for funding and to the women who provided the survey data. We thank the Australian Research Council (ARC) for funding the research via a discovery Project Grant (DP1094765) and for funding Associate Professor Alex Broom via a Future Fellowship (FT100100294). We also thank the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) for funding Professor Jon Adams via a Career Development Fellowship. Thanks to Mary-Anne Paton for her copy-editing and final preparation of the manuscript.

References

  1. Adams, J., Sibbritt, D., Easthope, G. and Young, A. (2003) The profile of women who consult alternative health practitioners in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia 179 (6): 297–300.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J., Sibbritt, D. and Lui, C.-W. (2011) The use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: A longitudinal study of Australian women. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care 38 (3): 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anspach, R. (1988) Notes on the sociology of medical discourse: The language of case presentation. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 29 (4): 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008) Complementary therapies. In: Australian Social Trends 2008. Cat. no. 4102.0 Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics, http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Chapter5202008, accessed 4 January 2014.
  5. Baarts, C. and Pedersen, I. (2009) Derivative benefits: Exploring the body through complementary and alternative medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness 31 (5): 719–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, P., Bloom, B. and Nahin, R. (2008) Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. National Health Statistics Reports. no. 12. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, F. and Yardley, L. (2004) Constructing agency in treatment decisions. Health 8 (4): 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bix, A. (2004) Engendering alternatives: Women’s health care choices and feminist medical rebellions. In: R. Johnston (ed.) The Politics of Healing: Histories of Alternative Medicine in Twentieth-Century North America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Broom, A. and Tovey, P. (2007) The dialectical tension between individuation and depersonalization in cancer patients’ mediation of complementary, alternative and biomedical cancer treatments. Sociology 41 (6): 1021–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Connor, L. (2004) Relief, risk and renewal: Mixed therapy regimens in an Australian suburb. Social Science and Medicine 59 (8): 1695–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coulter, I. and Willis, E. (2007) Explaining the growth of complementary and alternative medicine. Health Sociology Review 16 (3–4): 214–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doel, M. and Segrott, J. (2003) Self, health, and gender: Complementary and alternative medicine in the British mass media. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 10 (2): 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ezzy, D. (2002) Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. Australia, Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. Frawley, J., Adams, J., Sibbritt, D., Steele, A., Broom, A. and Gallois, C. (2013) Prevalence and determinants of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use during pregnancy: Results from a nationally representative sample of Australian pregnant women. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 53 (4): 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glover, D.D., Amonkar, M., Rybeck, B.F. and Tracy, T.S. (2003) Prescription, over-the-counter, and herbal medicine use in a rural, obstetric population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188 (4): 1039–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Golden, J. (2005) Message in a Bottle: The Making of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hanssen, B., Grimsgaard, S., Launsoslash, L., Foslashnneboslash, V., Falkenberg, T. and Rusmussen, N. (2005) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in the Scandinavian countries. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 23 (1): 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, G., Connor, L., Bisits, A. and Higginbotham, N. (2004) ‘Seeing the baby’: Pleasures and dilemmas of ultrasound technologies for primiparous Australian women. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 18 (1): 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hepner, D., Harnett, M., Segall, S., Camann, W., Bader, A. and Tsen, L. (2002) Herbal medicine use in parturients. Anesthesia & Analgesia 94 (3): 690–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, Z., McNally, L. and Sullivan, E. (2011) Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2009. Perinatal Statistics Series. Sydney, Australia: AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit.Google Scholar
  22. Locock, L., Alexander, J. and Rozmovits, L. (2008) Women’s responses to nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Midwifery 24 (2): 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luff, D. and Thomas, K. (2000) Getting somewhere, feeling cared for: Patient perspectives on complementary and alternative medicine. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 8 (4): 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lupton, D. (ed.) (1999) Risk and the ontology of pregnant embodiment. Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lupton, D. (2012) ‘Precious cargo’: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health 22 (3): 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lupton, D. and Schmied, V. (2013) Splitting bodies/selves: Women’s concepts of embodiment at the moment of birth. Sociology of Health and Illness 35 (6): 828–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maats, F. and Crowther, C. (2002) Patterns of vitamin, mineral and herbal supplement use prior to and during pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 42 (5): 494–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marteau, T. et al (1992) Psychological models in predicting uptake of prenatal screening. Psychology & Health 6 (1–2): 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mclean, S. (2005) ‘The illness is part of the person’: Discourses of blame, individual responsibility and individuation at a centre for spiritual healing in the north of England. Sociology of Health and Illness 27 (5): 628–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mellin, G. and Katzenstein, M. (1962) The saga of Thalidomide: Neuropathy to embryopathy, with case reports of congenital anomalies. The New England Journal of Medicine 267: 1184–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meurk, C., Broom, A., Adams, J. and Sibbritt, D. (2012) Bodies of knowledge: Nature, holism and women’s plural health practices. Health 17 (3): 300–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. (2011) What is complementary and alternative medicine? //nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam, accessed 1 November 2011.
  34. Potter, D. (2012) Drawing the line at drinking for two: Governmentality, biopolitics, and risk in state legislation on fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. In: J. Netherland (ed.) Critical Perspectives on Addiction. (Advances in Medical Sociology, Vol. 14) Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Re, W. (2003) Herbal healing in pregnancy: Women’s experiences. Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy 3 (4): 17–39.Google Scholar
  36. Ruzek, S. (1978) The Women’s Health Movement. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  37. Searle, J. (1996) Fearing the worst – Why do pregnant women feel ‘at risk’? Australia and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 36 (3): 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharma, U. (1992) Complementary Medicine Today. Practitioners and Patients. London: Tavistock/Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Sointu, E. (2006) Healing bodies, feeling bodies: Embodiment and alternative and complementary health practices. Social Theory and Health 4 (3): 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sointu, E. (2011) Detraditionalisation, gender, and alternative and complementary medicines. Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (3): 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Squier, S. (1996) Fetal subjects and maternal objects: Reproductive technology and the new fetal/maternal relation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (5): 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tovey, P. and Adams, J. (2001) Primary care as intersecting social worlds. Social Science and Medicine 52 (5): 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsui, B., Dennehy, C. and Tsourounis, C. (2001) A survey of dietary supplement use during pregnancy at an academic medical center. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185 (2): 433–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Upsdell, M. and Jaye, C. (2011) Engaging with complementary and alternative medicine in general practice. Journal of Primary Health Care 3 (1): 29–34.Google Scholar
  45. Zadoroznyj, M. (2001) Birth and the ‘reflexive consumer’: Trust, risk and medical dominance in obstetric encounters. Journal of Sociology 37 (2): 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of QueenslandHerstonAustralia
  2. 2.School of Social Science, The University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  3. 3.University of Technology SydneyUltimoAustralia

Personalised recommendations