Advertisement

Social Theory & Health

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 105–123 | Cite as

Freedom and pressure in self-disclosure

  • Venke Frederike Johansen
  • Therese Marie Andrews
  • Haldis Haukanes
  • Ulla-Britt Lilleaas
Original Article

Abstract

Today there is great openness about breast cancer, and the current ideology is that this is considered positive. This article draws upon sociological and philosophical theories to explore psychological practices. We ask: do women experience as much freedom to not talk about their illness as they do to talk about it? Do they experience that not being open is as favourably valued as openness is? The article is based on an ethnographic study in which women have given detailed accounts of how, to whom and in which situations they have been open or closed about their illness. It shows that breast cancer sufferers do not always experience a real choice between withholding and sharing information. As such, openness cannot be considered as the best practice for all breast cancer sufferers.

Keywords

breast cancer self-disclosure social sharing positive freedom negative freedom 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the women who took part in this study.

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berlin, I. (1958) Two Concepts of Liberty: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered Before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  3. Brinkmann, S. and Kvale, S. (2005) Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Contructivist Psychology 18 (2): 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dindia, K. (2000) Sex differences in self-disclosure, reciprocity of Self-disclosure, and self-disclosure and liking: Three meta-analysis reviewed. In: S. Petronio (ed.) Balancing the Secrets of Private Disclosures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
  5. Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concept of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards, E. (2009) Resilience: Reflections on the Burdens and Gifts of Facing Life’s Adversities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Elias, N. (1978) The Civilizing Process. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Featherstone, M. (1982) The body in consumer culture. Theory, Culture & Society 18 (1): 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Figueiredo, M.I., Fries, E. and Ingram, K.M. (2004) The role of disclosure patterns and unsupportive social interactions in the well-being of breast cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology 13 (2): 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1986) The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Frey, R.G. (2000) Privacy, control and talk of rights. In: E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller and D. Paul (eds.) The Right to Privacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–67.Google Scholar
  12. Henderson, B., Davidson, K., Pennebaker, J., Gatchel, R. and Baum, A. (2002) Disease disclosure patterns among breast cancer patients. Psychology & Health 17 (1): 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holst, C. (2002) Retten til privatliv. In: C. Holst (ed.) Kjønnsrettferdighet. Utfordringer for feministisk politikk. Gjøvik, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk, pp. 122–156.Google Scholar
  14. Johansen, V.F., Andrews, T.M. and Haukanes, H. (2009) Når det intime blir offentlig. kvinners erfaringer med åpenhet om egen sykdom. Nordisk tidsskrift for helseforskning 10 (2): 2–17.Google Scholar
  15. Johansen, V.F., Andrews, T.M., Haukanes, H. and Lilleaas, U.B. (2013) Symbols and meanings in breast cancer awareness campaigns. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 21 (2): 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jourard, S.M. (1971) Self-disclosure. An Experimental Analysis of the Transparent Self. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Kant, I. (1788/1997) Critique of Practical Reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Koopman, C., Hermanson, K., Diamond, S., Angell, K. and Spiegel, D. (1998) Social support, life stress, pain and emotional adjustment to advanced breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 7 (2): 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lilleaas, U.B. (2006) Det sterke kjønns sårbarhet. Sosiologisk tidsskrift 14 (4): 311–325.Google Scholar
  20. Olson, J.S. (2002) Bathsheba’s Breast: Women, Cancer and History. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Orgad, S. (2006) The cultural dimensions of online communication: a study of breast cancer patients’ internet spaces. New Media & Society 8 (6): 877–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pennebaker, J.W. (1997a) Opening Up: The Healing Power of Expressing Emotions. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pennebaker, J.W. (1997b) Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science 8 (3): 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pistrang, N. and Barker, C. (1992) Disclosure of concerns in breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 1 (3): 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pitts, V. (2004) Illness and internet empowerment: Writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace. Health: Interdisciplinary Journal of Health, Illness and Medicine 8 (1): 33–59.Google Scholar
  26. Rimé, B. (2007) The social sharing of emotion as an interface between individual and collective processes in the construction of emotional climates. Journal of Social Issues 63 (2): 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rimé, B. (2009) Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: theory and empirical review. Emotion Review 1 (1): 60–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryel, A.L. (2006) Menn ikke tause om kreft, Aftenposten, 7 April.Google Scholar
  29. Sennett, R. (1977) The Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  30. Sennett, R. (2003) Respect in a World of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  31. Simmel, G. (1964) Types of social relationships. In: K.H Wolff (ed.) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, D.E. (1988) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, D.E. (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Toronto, Canada: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  34. Solheim, J. (1998) Den åpne Kroppen. Om Kjønnssymbolikk i moderne Kultur. Oslo, Norway: Pax Forlag.Google Scholar
  35. Spradley, J.P. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (2007) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Positive and Negative Liberty. 8 October. http://plato.stanford.edu/search/searcher.py?query=Negative+liberty, accessed 10 November 2009.Google Scholar
  36. Stewart, D.E. Cheung et al. (2001) Long-term breast cancer survivors: Confidentiality, disclosure, effects on work and insurance. Psycho-Oncology 10 (3): 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weinreb, L.L. (2000) The right to privacy. In: E.F. Paul, F.D. Miller and J. Paul (eds.) The Right to Privacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
  38. Wiggen, I. (2007) Rosa bil. Oslo, Norway: Versal Forlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Venke Frederike Johansen
    • 1
  • Therese Marie Andrews
    • 2
  • Haldis Haukanes
    • 2
  • Ulla-Britt Lilleaas
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AgderKristiansandNorway
  2. 2.University of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations