Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 640–660 | Cite as

Cross-border crime patterns unveiled by exchange of DNA profiles in the European Union

  • Wim Bernasco
  • Marre Lammers
  • Kees van der Beek
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to make a head start with unveiling transnational spatial patterns in offending. To that end, data are used from DNA profile exchange between The Netherlands and 18 other EU member states that have implemented EU legislation on forensic cooperation. Information was collected on all DNA stains entered into the database, including the region in The Netherlands where the stain was secured, the type of crime and how many matching DNA profiles had been identified in each of the other 18 countries. The results suggest that currently the profiles of offenders who are active in other Prüm countries make up for about 4 per cent of all DNA stain profiles in the Dutch DNA database. The highest share of cross-border matches is found in the southeastern part of The Netherlands, where The Netherlands borders one of the most densely populated regions of Germany.

Keywords

cross-border crime offender mobility DNA European Union Prüm treaty 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The reported research was part of the project Prüm Implementation, Evaluation and Strengthening of Forensic DNA Data Exchange (PIES) that was supported by the Program Prevention of and Fight against Crime (ISEC) of the Department of Home Affairs of the European Commission (project number HOME/2011/ISEC/AG/PRUM/4000002150, grant agreement number: 30-CE-0498536/00-03). The sole responsibility for the findings reported and opinions expressed in this article lies with the authors. The Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. The authors thank the guest editors and reviewers for helpful comments on a previous draft of the text.

References

  1. Canter, D. and Larkin, P. (1993) The environmental range of serial rapists. Journal Of Environmental Psychology 13(1): 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Egger, S.A. (1984) A working definition of serial murder and the reduction of linkage blindness. Journal Of Police Science and Administration 12(3): 348–357.Google Scholar
  3. Geddes, A. (2003) The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Huet, M. and Leplingard, A. (2014) Operational and strategic perspectives on the French DNA database. The Prüm Implementation, Evaluation and Strengthening of Forensic Data Exchange. 25–26 June 2014, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, S. et al (2007) Space–Time patterns of risk: A cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23(3): 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kleemans, E.R. and De Poot, C.J. (2008) Criminal careers in organized crime and social opportunity structure. European Journal of Criminology 5(1): 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lammers, M. (2014) Are arrested and non-arrested serial offenders different? A test of spatial offending patterns using DNA found at crime scenes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 51(2): 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lammers, M. and Bernasco, W. (2013) Are mobile offenders less likely to be caught? The influence of the geographical dispersion of serial offenders’ crime locations on their probability of arrest. European Journal of Criminology 10(2): 168–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lammers, M., Bernasco, W. and Elffers, H. (2012) How long do offenders escape arrest? Using DNA traces to analyse when serial offenders are caught. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 9(1): 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leary, D. and Pease, K. (2003) DNA and the active criminal population. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 5(1): 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Levine, N. and Lee, P. (2013) Journey-to-crime by gender and age group in Manchester, England. In: M. Leitner (ed.) Crime Modeling and Mapping Using Geospatial Technologies. Houten, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, P.D., Schmitter, H. and Schneider, P.M. (2001) A brief history of the formation Of DNA databases in forensic science within Europe. Forensic Science International 119(2): 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Papatsiba, V. (2006) Making higher education more European through student mobility? Revisiting EU initiatives in the context of the Bologna process 1. Comparative Education 42(1): 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Passas, N. (2002) Cross-border crime and the interface between legal and illegal actors. In: P.C. Van Duyne, K. Von Lampe and N. Passas (eds.) Upperworld and Underworld in Cross-Border Crime. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Polišenská, V.A. (2008) A qualitative approach to the criminal mobility of burglars: Questioning the ‘near-home’ hypothesis. Crime Patterns and Analysis 1(1): 47–59.Google Scholar
  16. Porter, M. (1996) Tackling Cross Border Crime, Crime Detection and Prevention Series. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  17. Siegel, D. (2014) Mobile Banditry: East and Central European Itinerant Criminal Groups in The Netherlands. Meppel, The Netherlands: Boom-Lemma.Google Scholar
  18. Snook, B. (2004) Individual differences in distance traveled by serial burglars. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 1(1): 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Townsley, M.T., Smith, C. and Pease, K. (2006) First impressions count: Serious detections arising from criminal justice samples. Genomics, Society and Policy 2(1): 28–40.Google Scholar
  20. Van Daele, S. (2008) Organized property crimes in Belgium: The case of the ‘itinerant crime groups’. Global Crime 9(3): 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Daele, S. and Vander Beken, T. (2010) Journey to crime of ‘itinerant crime groups’. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 33(2): 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Daele, S., Vander Beken, T. and Bruinsma, G.J.N. (2012) Does the mobility of foreign offenders fit the general pattern of mobility? European Journal of Criminology 9(3): 290–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vandeviver, C. (2013) Distance matters: A look at crime trip distances in flanders. In: A. Crawford, J. De Maillard, J. Shapland, A. Verhage and P. Ponsaers (eds.) Crime, Violence, Justice and Social Order: Monitoring Contemporary Security Issues. Ghent, Belgium: Maklu.Google Scholar
  24. Wiles, P. and Costello, A. (2000) The ‘Road to Nowhere’: The Evidence for Traveling Criminals. London: Home Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wim Bernasco
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marre Lammers
    • 1
  • Kees van der Beek
    • 3
  1. 1.Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Spatial EconomicsAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI)The HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations