Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 107–121 | Cite as

The Fraud Triangle revisited

  • Alexander Schuchter
  • Michael Levi
Original Article

Abstract

This article revisits the Fraud Triangle, an explanatory framework for financial fraud, originally developed by the American criminologist Donald Cressey from his interviews with embezzlers. First of all, we describe several developmental cornerstones of the Fraud Triangle. Its recent theoretical and practical application is reconsidered. In accordance with the three elements – motivation, opportunity, rationalization – and on the basis of our empirical study of 13 company fraudsters in Austria and Switzerland, we illustrate some within-company measures, which may contribute to a low fraud risk corporate culture. Although opportunity is necessary but not a sufficient condition for ‘upperworld’ criminal offences, our respondents regard the perceived pressures they experienced as salient. Rather than rationalizations, there is a ‘fraud-inhibiting inner voice’ before the crime, which normally deters an individual from fraudulent behaviour. This inner voice becomes quieter over time until the fraud occurs; at least in their cases. Our interviewees argue that all Fraud Triangle elements – including the inner voice – are highly influenced by the corporate culture in their companies.

Keywords

Fraud Triangle Fraud Diamond white-collar crime motivation fraudulent opportunity pressure rationalization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of 13 convicted Swiss and Austrian fraudsters, the support of judicial agency staff in Switzerland and Austria, forensic experts through several conversations as well as the ACFE Switzerland Chapter. As usual, all matters of fact and interpretation remain the responsibility of the Authors. This research was funded through a 1-year grant of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF), which did not influence the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data; nor the writing of the report or the decision to submit the article for publication. In any event, they are an apolitical scientific body.

References

  1. Albrecht, W.S. and Albrecht, C.O. (2004) Fraud Examination and Prevention. Mason: South-Western Educational.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J.L. (1961) Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Babiak, P. and Hare, R.D. (2007) Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  4. Benson, M.L., Madensen, T.D. and Eck, J.E. (2009) White-collar crime from an opportunity perspective. In: S.S. Simpson and D. Weisburd (eds.) The Criminology of White-collar Crime. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blickle, G., Schlegel, A., Fassbender, P. and Klein, U. (2006) Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology: An International Review 55 (2): 220–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bussmann, K.-D. and Werle, M. (2006) Addressing crime in companies: First findings from a global survey of economic crime. British Journal of Criminology 46 (6): 1128–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coates, J. (2012) The Hour Between Dog and Wolf: Risk-Taking, Gut Feelings and the Biology of Boom and Bust. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J.W. (1987) Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology 93 (2): 406–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, J.W. (1989) The Criminal Elite: The Sociology of White-collar Crime, 2nd edn. New York: St. Martin.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, J.W. (1992) Crime and money: Motivation and opportunity in a monetarized economy. The American Behavioral Scientist 35 (6): 827–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, J.W. (2001) The causes of white-collar crime and the validity of explanation in the social sciences. In: S.-A. Lindgren (ed.) White-collar Crime Research: Old Views and Future Potentials. Stockholm: National Council for Crime Prevention, pp. 55–68.Google Scholar
  12. Cressey, D.R. (1950) The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review 15 (6): 738–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cressey, D.R. (1953) Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cressey, R.D. (1952) Application and verification of the differential association theory. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 43 (1): 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cressey, R.D. (1954) The differential association theory and compulsive crimes. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 45 (1): 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Croall, H. (2001) Understanding White Collar Crime. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dhami, M.K. (2007) White-collar prisoners’ perceptions of audience reaction. Deviant Behavior 28 (1): 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donegan, J.J. and Ganon, M.W. (2008) Strain, differential association, and coercion: Insights from the criminology literature on causes of accountant's misconduct. Accounting and the Public Interest 8 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dorminey, J.W., Fleming, A.S., Kranacher, M.-J. and Riley, R.A. (2010) Beyond the fraud triangle: Enhancing deterrence of economic crimes. The CPA Journal 80 (7): 17–24.Google Scholar
  20. Farber, D. (2005) Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review 80 (2): 539–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gill, M. (2011a) Fraud and recessions: Views from fraudsters and fraud managers. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 39 (3): 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gill, M. (2011b) Learning from fraudsters’ accounts of their offending. Prison Service Journal 194: 27–32.Google Scholar
  23. Golden, T.W., Skalak, S.L. and Clayton, M.M. (2006) A Guide to Forensic Accounting Investigation. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Goldstraw-White, J. (2012) White-collar Crime: Accounts of Offending Behaviour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heath, J. (2008) Business ethics and moral motivation: A criminological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4): 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howe, M.A. and Malgwi, C.A. (2006) Playing the ponies: A $5 million embezzlement case. Journal of Education for Business 82 (1): 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klenowski, P.M., Heith, C. and Mullins, C.W. (2010) Gender, identity, and accounts: How white collar offenders do gender when making sense of their crimes. Justice Quarterly 28 (1): 46–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LaSalle, R.E. (2007) Effects of the fraud triangle on students’ risk assessments. Journal of Accounting Education 25 (1/2): 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levi, M. (2002) Suite justice or sweet charity? Some explorations of shaming and incapacitating business fraudsters. Punishment & Society 4 (2): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levi, M. (2008) The Phantom Capitalists: The Organization and Control of Long-firm Fraud, 2nd edn. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. Levi, M. (2010a) Individual differences and white-collar crime. In: P. Wilcox and F.T. Cullen (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Criminological Theory. London: Sage Publications, pp. 469–473.Google Scholar
  32. Levi, M. (2010b) Serious tax fraud and non-compliance: A review of evidence on the differential impact of criminal and noncriminal proceedings. Criminology & Public Policy 9 (3): 493–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levi, M. and Burrows, J. (2008) Measuring the impact of fraud in the UK: A conceptual and empirical journey. British Journal of Criminology 48 (3): 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loebbecke, J.K., Eining, M.M. and Willingham, J.J. (1989) Auditors’ experience with material irregularities: Frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 9 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar
  35. Lou, Y.I. and Wang, M.L. (2009) Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research 7 (2): 61–78.Google Scholar
  36. Marden, R. and Edwards, R. (2005) Internal controls for the small business: Skimming and the fraud triangle. Internal Auditing 20 (1): 3–10.Google Scholar
  37. Mills, C.W. (1940) Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review 5 (6): 904–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nettler, G. (1974) Embezzlement without problems. British Journal of Criminology 14 (1): 70–77.Google Scholar
  39. Ones, D. and Viswesvaran, C. (2001) Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9 (1/2): 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piquero, N.L. (2012) The only thing we have to fear is fear itself: Investigating the relationship between fear of falling and white-collar crime. Crime & Delinquency 58 (3): 362–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Punch, M. (1996) Dirty Business: Exploring Corporate Misconduct. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Punch, M. (2000) Suite violence: Why managers murder and corporations kill. Crime, Law and Social Change 33 (3): 243–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Riemer, S.H. (1941) Embezzlement: Pathological basis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 32 (4): 411–423.Google Scholar
  44. Romney, M.B., Albrecht, W.S. and Cherrington, D.J. (1980) Auditors and the detection of fraud: The authors provide a unique fraud-risk-evaluation questionnaire. The Journal of Accountancy 149 (5): 63–69.Google Scholar
  45. Sakurai, Y. and Smith, R.G. (2003) Gambling as a motivation for the commission of financial crime. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 256: 1–6.Google Scholar
  46. Schnatterly, K. (2003) Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime. Strategic Management Journal 24 (7): 587–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shover, N. and Hochstetler, A. (2006) Choosing White-collar Crime. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Slapper, G. and Tombs, S. (1999) Corporate Crime. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  49. Spencer, J.C. (1959) A study of incarcerated white-collar offenders. In: G. Geis (ed.) White-collar Criminal: The Offender in Business and the Professions. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 335–346.Google Scholar
  50. Stotland, E. (1977) White collar criminals. Journal of Social Issues 33 (4): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sutherland, E.H. (1940) White-collar criminality. American Sociological Review 5 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sutherland, E.H. (1941) Crime and business. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 217 (1): 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sutherland, E.H. and Cressey, D.R. (1960) Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  54. Sykes, G.M. and Matza, D. (1957) Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review 22 (6): 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weisburd, D. and Waring, E. (2001) White-collar Crime and Criminal Careers. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wheeler, S. (1992) The problem of white-collar crime motivation. In: K. Schlegel and D. Weisburd (eds.) White-collar Crime Reconsidered. Boston: Northeastern University Press, pp. 108–123.Google Scholar
  57. Willott, S., Griffin, C. and Torrance, M. (2001) Snakes and ladders: Upper-middle class male offenders talk about economic crime. Criminology 39 (2): 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Witzel, A. (2000) The problem-centered interview. Qualitative Social Research 1 (1), Article 22.Google Scholar
  59. Wolfe, D.T. and Hermanson, D.R. (2004) The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal 74 (12): 38–42.Google Scholar
  60. Zietz, D. (1981) Women Who Embezzle or Defraud: A Study of Convicted Felons. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management, University of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  2. 2.School of Social Sciences, Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations