Security Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 399–420 | Cite as

Gender-based perceptions of the 2001 anthrax attacks: Implications for outreach and preparedness

Original Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Extensive research dealing with gender-based perceptions of fear of crime has generally found that women express greater levels of fear compared to men. Further, studies have found that women engage in more self-protective behaviors in response to fear of crime, as well as have different levels of confidence in government efficacy relative to men. The majority of these studies have focused on violent and property crime; little research has focused on gender-based perceptions of the threat of bioterrorism. Using data from a national survey conducted by ABC News/Washington Post, this study contrasted perceptions of safety and fear in response to anthrax attacks among male and female respondents. Results indicated some gender differences in perceptions and responses to possible anthrax exposure, although not all achieved statistical significance. Results are discussed in relation to their implications for criminological theory, security and bioterrorism preparedness.

Keywords

gender bioterrorism fear of crime anthrax terrorism 

Notes

References

  1. ABC News/The Washington Post. (2001) ABC News/Washington Post Anthrax Poll #2, October 2001 (Computer File). ICPSR version. Horsham, PA: Taylor Nelson Sofres Intersearch [producer] 2001. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributer], 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, K. (1997) Gender and public opinion. In: B. Norrander and C. Wilcox (eds.) Understanding Public Opinion. Wahsington DC: GC Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, M.S. (1954) A note on multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society 16 (Series B): 296–298.Google Scholar
  4. Bouri, N. and Franco, C. (2010) Environmental decontamination following a large-scale bioterrorism attack: Federal progress and remaining gaps. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 8 (2): 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casadevall, A. and Pirofski, L.A. (2004) The weapon potential of a microbe. Trends in Microbiology 12 (6): 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Covington, J. and Taylor, R.B. (1991) Fear of crime in urban residential neighborhoods: Implications of between- and within-neighborhood sources for current models. Sociological Quarterly 32 (2): 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cronbach, L.J. (1970) Essentials of Psychological Testing, 3rd edn. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Ferraro, H.F. (1995) Fear of Crime: Interpreting Victimization Risk. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ferraro, H.F. (1996) Women's fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault? Social Forces 75 (2): 667–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher, B.S. and Sloan, J.J. (2003) Unraveling the fear of victimization among college women: Is the ‘shadow of sexual assault hypothesis’ supported? Justice Quarterly 20 (3): 633–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. The Gallup Organization. (2005) Gallup brain search: ‘terrorism’ (Database of survey items), http://brain.gallup.com/search/results.aspx?SearchTypeAll=TerrorismSearchConType=1Advanced=0Place=H.
  12. Gilchrist, E., Bannister, J., Ditton, J. and Farrall, S. (1998) Women and the ‘fear of crime’: Challenging the accepted stereotype. British Journal of Criminology 38 (2): 238–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordon, M. and Riger, S. (1989) The Social Cost of Rape. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gorman, B.J., DeSena, S. and Burch, M. (2011) Anthrax: The threat, treatments, response, and controversy. In: B.J. Gorman (ed.) Biosecurity Commons Review, Annual Edition, 5–11, http://www.towson.edu/sociology/3%20-%20Faculty%20Information/faculty/documents/Biosecurity_Commons_Review_May_2011.pdf.
  15. Graham, B. et al (2008) World at Risk: The Report of the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism. New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
  16. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Capelos, T. and Provost, C. (2002) The consequences of terrorism: Disentangling the effects of personal and national threat. Political Psychology 23 (3): 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jernigan, D. et al (2002) Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: Epidemiologic findings. Emerging Infectious Diseases, October 2002, at 1019, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2730292/pdf/02-353_FinalR.pdf.
  18. Jones, J. (2000) Americans Less Concerned about Terrorist Attacks Five Years after Oklahoma City. Washington DC: The Gallup Organization.Google Scholar
  19. Junger, M. (1987) Women's experiences of sexual harassment. British Journal of Criminology 27 (4): 358–383.Google Scholar
  20. Kaiser, H. (1974) An index of factoral simplicity. Psychometrika 39 (1): 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaminski, R.J., Koons-Witts, B.A., Stewart Thompson, N. and Weiss, D. (2010) The impacts of Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois University shootings on fear of crime on campus. Journal of Criminal Justice 38 (1): 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laub, J.H. and Sampson, R.J. (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Madriz, E. (1997) Images of criminals and victims – A study on women's fear and social control. Gender and Society 11 (3): 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maxfield, M.G. and Babbie, E. (1995) Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology. Albany, NY: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  25. Nellis, A.M. (2009) Gender differences in fear of terrorism. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 25 (3): 322–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Parsons, T. (1954) Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Penn, E.B., Higgins, G.E., Gabbidon, S.L. and Jordan, K.L. (2009) Government efforts on homeland security and crime: Public views and opinions. American Journal of Criminal Justice 34 (1–2): 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pittman, E. (2010) Letter carriers add bioterror response to postal service. Emergency Management,http://www.emergencymgmt.com/health/Letter-Carriers-Add-Bioterror-Response-to-the-Postal-Service.html, accessed 20 March 2011.
  30. Ready Campaign. (2003) Ready campaign [Fact sheet], http://www.ready.gov/about-us, accessed 14 March 2012.
  31. Saad, L. (2004) Three Years after 9/11, Most Americans Carrying on Normally. Washington DC: the Gallup Organization.Google Scholar
  32. Sacco, V.F. (1990) Gender, fear, and victimization: A preliminary application of power-control theory. Sociological Spectrum 10 (4): 485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schafer, J.A., Huebner, B.M. and Bynum, T.S. (2006) Fear of crime and criminal victimization: Gender-based contrasts. Journal of Criminal Justice 34 (3): 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schlesinger, M. and Heldman, C. (2001) Gender gap or gender gaps: New perspectives for support on government actions and policies. The Journal of Politics 63 (1): 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skogan, W. and Maxfield, M. (1981) Coping with Crime. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, S.J. (1989) Social relations, neighborhood structure and the fear of crime in Britain. In: D. Evans and D. Herbert (eds.) The Geography of Crime. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, W.R. and Torstensson, M. (1997) Gender differences in risk perception and neutralizing fear of crime: Towards resolving the paradoxes. British Journal of Criminology 37 (4): 608–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snedker, K.A. (2006) Altruistic and vicarious fear of crime: Fear for others and gendered social roles. Sociological Forum 21 (2): 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stanko, E.A. (1990) Everyday Violence: How Men and Women Experience Sexual and Physical Danger. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
  40. Sullivan, E. (2008, December 26) Homeland security: Expect bioterrorism within 5 years. Chronicle, http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/6182176.html.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson, T. (2011) Tommy Thompson: Anthrax attacks could happen again, 10 years later, http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/09/tommy-thompson-anthrax-attacks-could-happen-again-10-years-later/.
  42. Thorndike, R.L. (ed.) (1971) Educational Measurement, 2nd edn. Washington DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  43. United States Government Accountability Office. (2010) Emergency Preparedness: FEMA Faces Challenges Integrating Community Preparedness Programs into its Strategic Approach GAO-10-19. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  44. Warr, M. (1984) Fear of victimization: Why are women and the elderly more afraid? Social Science Quarterly 65 (3): 681–702.Google Scholar
  45. Warr, M. (1994) Public perceptions and reactions to violent offending victimization. In: A.J. Reiss Jr and J.A. Roth (eds.) Understanding and Preventing Violent: Consequences and Control, Vol. 4. Washington DC: National Research Council, pp. 1–66.Google Scholar
  46. Warr, M. (2000) Fear of Crime in the United States: Avenues for Research and Policy. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  47. Warr, M. and Ellison, C.G. (2000) Rethinking social reactions to crime: Personal and altruistic fear in family households. American Journal of Sociology 106 (3): 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Welsh, W.N. (2001) Effects of student and school factors on five measures of school disorder. Justice Quarterly 18 (4): 911–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilcox, P., Ozer, M.M., Gunbeyi, M. and Gundogdu, T. (2009) Gender and fear of terrorism in Turkey. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 25 (3): 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams-Reid, L. and Konrad, M. (2004) The gender gap and fear: Assessing the interactive effects of gender and perceived risk of fear of crime. Sociological Spectrum 24 (4): 399–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yavuz, N. and Welsh, E.W. (2010) Addressing fear of crime in public space: Gender differences in reaction to safety measures in train transit. Urban Studies 47 (12): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Justice StudiesMontclair State UniversityMontclairUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyTowson University, Anthropology, and Criminal JusticeTowsonUSA

Personalised recommendations