Security Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 149–156 | Cite as

The role of territoriality in crime prevention: A field experiment

  • Richard Wortley
  • Matthew McFarlane
Original Article

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in a university library to assess the effect of symbolic territorial cues on preventing the theft of a photocopy card which was left on a library desk. Territoriality was conceived as comprising two dimensions – ownership and guardianship. In a 2 × 2 design, ownership was operationized by signing or not signing the card, and guardianship was operationized by leaving the card next to library books or on its own. Both territorial cues were successful in reducing theft levels. It was argued that the crime prevention role of territorial cues needs to be conceived of in terms that are broader than alerting potential offenders to increased levels of surveillance.

Keywords

territoriality situational crime prevention defensible space library theft field experiment 

References

  1. Altman, I. (1975) The Environment and Social Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  2. Ardrey, R. (1966) The Territorial Imperative. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, F. (1973) Study of spatial markers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 26: 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, B.B. (1987) Territoriality. In: D. Stokols and I. Altman (eds.) Handbook of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 1, New York: Wiley-Interscience, pp. 505–531.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, B.B. and Altman, I. (1981) Territoriality and residential crime: A conceptual framework. In: P.J. Brantingham and P.L. Brantingham (eds.) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, B.B. and Altman, I. (1983) Territoriality, defensible space and residential burglary: An environmental analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3: 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, B.B. and Bentley, D.L. (1993) Residential burglars judge risk: The role of territoriality. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, B., Perkins, D. and Brown, G. (2003) Place attachment in a revitalizing neighbourhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunson, L., Kuo, F. and Sullivan, W.C. (2001) Resident appropriation of defensible space in public housing: Implications for safety and community. Environment and Behavior 33: 626–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, R.V. and Homel, R. (1997) A revised classification of situational crime prevention techniques. In: S.P. Lab (ed.) Crime Prevention at the Crossroads. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson, pp. 21–35.Google Scholar
  11. Edney, J.J. (1974) Human territoriality. Psychological Bulletin 81: 959–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edney, J.J. (1975) Territoriality and control: A field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31: 1108–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, P.B. and Brown, B.B. (1996) The home and identity display: Interpreting resident territoriality from home exteriors. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hediger, H. (1950) Wild Animals in Captivity. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  15. Lorenz, K. (1966) On Aggression. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  16. Newman, O. (1972) Defensible Space. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  17. Perkins, D., Wandersman, A., Rich, R. and Taylor, R. (1993) The physical environment of street crime: Defensible space, territoriality and incivilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13: 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schwartz, B. and Barsky, S.P. (1977) The home advantage. Social Forces 55: 641–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, H.W. (1981) Territorial spacing on a beach revisited: A cross-national exploration. Social Psychology Quarterly 44: 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sykes, G. and Matza, D. (1957) Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Journal of Sociology 22: 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor, R.B. and Lanni, J.C. (1981) Territorial dominance: The influence of the resident advantage in triadic decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41: 909–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Taylor, R., Gottfredson, S. and Brower, S. (1984) Block crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 21: 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Wortley
    • 1
  • Matthew McFarlane
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations