Advertisement

Before BISA: the British Coordinating Committee for International Studies, S.H. Bailey, and the Bailey Conferences

  • Barry BuzanEmail author
Original Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

The story of how International Relations in Britain was organised before the setting up of BISA in 1975 has been largely forgotten. This paper recovers that history and shows that it links directly back to the interwar years, when the British Coordinating Committee for International Studies was set up as part of the League of Nations-linked International Studies Conferences. S.H. Bailey, a long-forgotten junior scholar at the LSE, almost single-handedly pioneered what was after 1945 to become the norm of national academic associations and conferences for IR.

Keywords

S.H. Bailey British Coordinating Committee for International Studies British International Studies Association International Studies Conference Susan Strange 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For various help with finding and interpreting the facts, contributing their memories and understandings, and commenting on drafts, I would like to thank David Armstrong, Michael Banks, Chris Brown, Tim Dunne, Nat Dyer, John Groom, Barry Jones, Alan James, George Lawson, David Long, Cornelia Navari, Michael Riemens, John Simpson, Nicholas Sims, Jack Spence, Trevor Taylor, Brunello Vigezzi, and Peter Wilson. Particular thanks to Mick Cox both for comments, and for sharing his expertise on, and access to, the LSE archives. For excellent help with finding and using the relevant archives, I would also like to thank David Bates and his colleagues at Chatham House, and Anna Towlson and her colleagues at the LSE Archives.

References

  1. Acharya, A., and B. Buzan. 2019. The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashworth, L.M. 2014. A History of International Thought: From the Origins of the Modern State to Academic International Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, S.H. 1932. The Framework of International Society. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, S.H. 1933. International Studies in Great Britain. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, S.H. 1938. International Studies in Modern Education. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, S.H. LSE Archives, Bailey/8 (Various Documents Relating to the ISC, IPR).Google Scholar
  7. British Coordinating Committee for International Studies (BCCIS) (1928–49). Royal Institute of International Affairs archives, BCCIS 10/1a-z and 9/5b. (Agendas, Minutes and Documents of the BCCIS Meetings, and Some Documents from the International Studies Conference, Covering 1928–49).Google Scholar
  8. British Coordinating Committee for International Studies (BCCIS) (1957–70). LSE Archives, BISA/1 (Agendas and Minutes of the BCCIS Meetings, and Agendas and Participant Lists of the Bailey Conferences, Covering 1957–70).Google Scholar
  9. British Coordinating Committee for International Studies (BCCIS) (1957–70). LSE Archives, BISA/11 (Agendas and Minutes of the BCCIS Meetings, and Agendas and Participant Lists of the Bailey Conferences, Covering 1971).Google Scholar
  10. British International Studies Association (BISA). LSE Archives, BISA/3 (Agendas and Minutes and Other Papers Around The Founding of BISA).Google Scholar
  11. British International Studies Association (BISA). LSE Archives, BISA/7 (Papers and Correspondence Around the Founding of BISA).Google Scholar
  12. British International Studies Association (BISA). LSE Archives, BISA/8 (Correspondence Around the Transition from BCCIS to BISA).Google Scholar
  13. British International Studies Association (BISA). LSE Archives, BISA/14 (BISA Newsletters).Google Scholar
  14. Brown, C. 1973. International Political Economy: Some Problems of an Inter-Disciplinary Enterprise. International Affairs 49(1): 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bull, H. 1966. International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach. World Politics 18(3): 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buzan, B. 2014. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cochran, M. 2009. Charting the Ethics of the English School: What “Good” is There in a Middle-Ground Ethics? International Studies Quarterly 53(1): 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, B. 2008. International Political Economy: An Intellectual History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cox, M. 2001. Introduction’ to E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years. Crisis, Basingstoke: Palgrave, ix-lviii.Google Scholar
  20. Dunne, T. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Epp, R. (2010) ‘The British Committee on the Theory of International Politics and Central Figures in the English School’. In International Studies Encyclopedia, ED. Robert A. Denemark, Blackwell Publishing for ISA, English School section editor Daniel M. Green.Google Scholar
  22. Heater, D. 1976. International Studies at the School Level: The Findings of Recent British Research. British Journal of International Studies 2(1): 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hooper, P.F. 1988. The Institute of Pacific Relations and the Origins of Asian and Pacific Studies. Pacific Affairs 61(1): 98–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. International Institute for Intellectual Cooperation. 1937. The International Studies Conference: Origins, Functions, Organisation. Paris: IIIC.Google Scholar
  25. Kristensen, P.M. (2019) “Nihil humani alienum a nobis putamus”: Early International Relations and the Problem of the International’, Paper for the ISA Conference, Toronto, 27–30 March 2019, 21 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Kuru, D. 2017. Who F(o)unded IR: American Philanthropists and the Discipline of International Relations in Europe. International Relations 31(1): 42–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Long, D. 2006. Who Killed the International Studies Conference? Review of International Studies 32(4): 603–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LSE/Staff Files/Bailey Stanley Hartnell, LSE Archives, (Various Documents Relating to Bailey’s Employment at the LSE and Arrangements Made After His Death).Google Scholar
  29. Manning, C.A.W. 1962. Out to Grass—And a Lingering Look Behind. International Relations 2(6): 347–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Northedge, F.S. 2003. The Department of International Relations at LSE: A Brief History. In International Relations at the LSE: A History of 75 Years, ed. H. Bauer and E. Brighi, 7–27. London: Millennium Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  31. Olson, W., and A.J.R. Groom. 1991. International Relations Then and Now: Origins and Trends in Interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Porter, B. (ed.). 1972. The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919–1969. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Porter, B., Personal Papers, held by Peter Wilson at the LSE.Google Scholar
  34. Richardson, N.R. 1989. The Study of International Relations in the United States. In The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art, ed. H.C. Dyer and L. Mangasarian, 281–295. London: The Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Riemens, M. (2008) The scientific study of international affairs in the inter-war years: The International Studies Conference and the Netherlands Co-ordinating Committee for International Studies. In eds. Nienke de Deugd, N., Drent, M., Volten P. (eds.), Conference Proceedings: Towards an Autonomous European IR ApproachRelevance and Strategy. 20-Year Anniversary Conference of the Department of International Relations/International Organization of the University of Groningen, 45 October 2007, Groningen: Groningen University Press, 203–216.Google Scholar
  36. Riemens, M. 2011. International Academic Cooperation on International Relations in the Interwar Period: the International Studies Conference. Review of International Studies 37(2): 911–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts, P. 2018. The Institute of Pacific Relations: pan-Pacific and pan-Asian visions of international order. International Politics 55(6): 836–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidt, B.C. 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  39. Strange, S. 1972. International Economic Relations I: The Need for an Interdisciplinary Approach. In The Study of International Affairs: Essays in Honour of Kenneth Younger, ed. R. Morgan, 63–84. London: RIIA/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Strange, S. 1989. I Never Meant to be an Academic. In Journeys through World Politics: Autobiographical Reflections of Thirty-four Academic Travelers, ed. J. Kruzel and J.N. Rosenau, 429–443. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  41. Strange, S. 1995. 1995 Presidential Address: ISA as a Microcosm. International Studies Quarterly 39(3): 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Suganami, H. 2003. British Institutionalists, or the English School, 20 Years On. International Relations 17(3): 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vigezzi, B. 2005. The British Committee on the Theory of International Politics 1954–1985: The Rediscovery of History. Milan: Edizzioni Unicopli.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations