Advertisement

Reckless ambition: Moscow’s policy toward the United States, 2016/17

  • Kimberly MartenEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Russia’s attempt to interfere in the 2016 US presidential election succeeded in introducing an element of chaos into US politics, but neither Russia nor its leader Vladimir Putin gained much from it. Instead, US sanctions against Russia increased, and Russia’s 2017 attempt to introduce a new “reset” policy to the administration of Donald Trump fell flat as conflict between the two countries escalated. This article describes what we know about Russian actions and delves into the Russian foreign policy decision-making process, proposing four alternative explanations for Russia’s 2016/17 policies toward the US: Putin’s psychological mindset; the limited rationality inherent in all similarly autocratic regimes; competing economic interests among Russia’s elite patron–client system; and the loss of centralized control over the actions of officers in Russia’s intelligence agencies. While there is insufficient evidence to choose among these explanations, the exercise is useful because it encourages analysts to think both beyond standard realist explanations and beyond the role of Putin as an individual.

Keywords

Russia USA Election meddling Decision-making Patron–client relations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Parts of this article draw on Kimberly Marten, “Explaining Russia’s Schizophrenic Policy toward the United States,” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 501 (Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Jan. 2018), http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policy-memos-pdf/Pepm501_Marten_Jan2018.pdf. A draft of that memo was presented at the PONARS-Eurasia Policy Conference, “U.S.–Russian Relations One Year After The U.S. Election,” cosponsored by the Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of Russia at New York University in November 2017. I am grateful both for those earlier opportunities and for the comments received as a result of them. I also thank Neil MacFarlane and Elias Götz for organizing this special issue and inviting me to participate, and an anonymous reviewer and Elias Götz for detailed comments on this manuscript.

References

  1. Allison, G.T. 1969. Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. American Political Science Review 63(3): 689–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, G.T., and M.H. Halperin. 1972. Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications. World Politics 24(Supplement): 40–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, P. 2013. Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Bar-Joseph, U. 1995. Intelligence Intervention in the Politics of Democratic States: The United States, Israel, and Britain. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bensinger, K., M. Elder, and Schoofs, M. 2017. These Reports Allege Trump Has Deep Ties To Russia. Buzzfeed, 10 January. https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbensinger/these-reports-allege-trump-has-deep-ties-to-russia. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  6. Bueno de Mesquita, B., and A. Smith. 2011. The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior Is Almost Always Good Politics. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  7. Bueno de Mesquita, B., A. Smith, R.M. Siverson, and J.D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clunan, A. 2009. The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  9. Connolly, R., and C. Sendstad 2017. Russia’s Role as an Arms Exporter: The Strategic and Economic Importance of Arms Exports for Russia. London: Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/publications/research/2017-03-20-russia-arms-exporter-connolly-sendstad.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  10. Dawisha, K. 2015. Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia?. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Entous, A., C. Timber, and E. Dwoskin. 2017. Russian Operations Used Facebook Ads to Exploit America’s Racial and Religious Divisions. Washington Post, 25 September.Google Scholar
  12. Fishman, M., and D. Litvinova. 2016. Why Putin Fired His Chief of Staff and Longtime Ally. The Moscow Times, 12 August. https://themoscowtimes.com/articles/why-putin-replaced-head-of-presidential-administration-54978. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  13. Forsberg, T., and C. Pursiainen. 2017. The Psychological Dimension of Russian Foreign Policy: Putin and the Annexation of Crimea. Global Society 31(2): 220–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabuev, A. 2016. Friends With Benefits? RussianChinese Relations After the Ukraine Crisis. Paper, Carnegie Moscow Center, Moscow. http://carnegie.ru/2016/06/29/friends-with-benefits-russian-chinese-relations-after-ukraine-crisis-pub-63953. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  15. Galeotti, M. 2012. Putin: Tactician or Strategist? In Moscow’s Shadows (blog), 19 October. https://inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/putin-tactician-or-strategist/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  16. Galeotti, M. 2016. Free Sergei Lavrov! ForeignPolicy.com, 17 February. http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/02/17/free-sergei-lavrov-putin-russia-syria/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  17. Galeotti, M. 2017. The Spies Who Love Putin. TheAtlantic.com, 17 January. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/01/fsb-kgb-putin/513272. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  18. Garthoff, R.L. 2015. Soviet Leaders and Intelligence: Assessing the American Adversary During the Cold War. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gel’man, V.G. 2012. Subversive Institutions, Informal Governance, and Contemporary Russian Politics. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45: 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gel’man, V. 2015. Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing Post-Soviet Regime Changes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. George, A.L. 1967. The “Operational Code”: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM5427.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  22. Götz, E. 2017. Putin, the State, and War: The Causes of Russia’s Near Abroad Assertion Revisited. International Studies Review 19(2): 228–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenberg, A. 2017. Everything We Know about Russia’s Election Hacking Playbook. Wired, 19 June. https://www.wired.com/story/russia-election-hacking-playbook/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  24. Hale, H.E. 2014. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall, T.H. 2011. We will not Swallow This Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger. Security Studies 20(4): 521–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanson, P. 2011. Networks, Cronies, and Business Plans. In Russia As a Network State, ed. V. Kononenko, and A. Moshes, 113–138. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill, F., and C.G. Gaddy. 2013. Mr. Putin: Operative in the Kremlin. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  28. Huddy, L., D.O. Sears, and J.S. Levy. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hudson, J. 2017. Russia Sought A Broad Reset With Trump, Secret Document Shows. Buzzfeed, 12 September. https://www.buzzfeed.com/johnhudson/russia-sought-a-broad-reset-with-trump-secret-document-shows. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  30. Ioffe, J. 2018. The Myth of Vladimir Putin the Puppet Master. The Atlantic (Jan./Feb.). https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/01/putins-game/546548/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  31. Kalugin, O. 2009. Spymaster: My Thirty-Two Years in Intelligence and Espionage against the West. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Knight, A.W. 1988. The KGB: Police and Politics in the Soviet Union. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  33. Knight, A. 2017. Orders to Kill: The Putin Regime and Political Murder. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  34. Koshkin, P. 2016. Why Even the Best Russian Think Tanks Struggle to Influence Foreign Policy. Russia Direct, 9 January. http://www.russia-direct.org/analysis/why-even-best-russian-think-tanks-struggle-influence-foreign-policy. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  35. Kramer, A.E. 2017. Fancy Sausages and a $2 Million Bribe: A Trial Uncovers Kremlin Infighting. New York Times, 15 December.Google Scholar
  36. LaFraniere, S., M. Mazzetti, and M. Apuzzo. 2017. How the Russia Inquiry Began: A Campaign Aide, Drinks and Talk of Political Dirt. New York Times, 30 December.Google Scholar
  37. Larson, D.W., and A. Shevchenko. 2010. Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy. International Security 34(4): 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larson, D.W., and A. Shevchenko. 2014. Russia Says No: Power, Status, and Emotions in Foreign Policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 11(3–4): 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levine, S. 2009. Putin’s Labyrinth: Spies, Murder, and the Dark Heart of the New Russia. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  40. Löwenheim, O., and G. Heimann. 2008. Revenge in International Politics. Security Studies 17(4): 685–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malloy, D. 2017. Who Will Succeed Vladimir Putin? You Decide. Ozy Magazine, 17 June. http://www.ozy.com/wildcard/who-will-succeed-vladimir-putin-you-decide/79149. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  42. Marten, K. 2015a. Informal Political Networks and Putin’s Foreign Policy: The Examples of Iran and Syria. Problems of Post-Communism 62(2): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marten, K. 2015b. Putin’s Choices: Explaining Russian Foreign Policy and Intervention in Ukraine. The Washington Quarterly 38(2): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marten, K. 2017a. Essay, in Policy Roundtable 1–7: Russia and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. H-Diplo International Security Studies Forum, 27 March. https://issforum.org/roundtables/policy/1-7-russia#Essay_by_Kimberly_Marten_Barnard_College_Columbia_University. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  45. Marten, K. 2017b. The ‘KGB State’ and Russian Political and Foreign Policy. Journal of Slavic Military Studies 30(2): 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McFaul, M.A. 2015. The Myth of Putin’s Strategic Genius. New York Times, 23 October.Google Scholar
  47. Mearsheimer, J. 2014. Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. Foreign Affairs 93(5): 5–49.Google Scholar
  48. Mercer, J. 2010. Emotional Beliefs. International Organization 64(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Minchenko, Y. (2017) Пoлитбюpo 2.0: peнoвaция вмecтo дeмoнтaжa. Minchenko Consulting, Moscow. http://www.minchenko.ru/analitika/analitika_74.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  50. Myers, S.L. 2015. The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Vladimir Putin. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  51. Nemtsova, A. 2006. A Chill in the Moscow Air. Newsweek, 5 February. http://www.newsweek.com/chill-moscow-air-113415. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  52. Noack, R. 2018. The Dutch Were a Secret U.S. Ally in War against Russian Hackers, Local Media Reveal. Washington Post, 6 January.Google Scholar
  53. Nossiter, A., D.E. Sanger, and N. Perlroth. 2017. Hackers Came, but the French Were Prepared. New York Times, 9 May.Google Scholar
  54. Panov, P., and C. Ross. 2013. Patterns of Electoral Contestation in Russian Regional Assemblies: Between ‘Competitive’ and ‘Hegemonic’ Authoritarianism. Demokratizatsiya 21(3): 369–399.Google Scholar
  55. Putin, V. 2000. First Person: An Astonishingly Frank Self-Portrait by Russia’s President. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  56. Putin, V. 2012. Interview to Russia Today TV Channel, 6 September. http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/4367. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  57. Putin, V. 2015. ‘We Did What We Had to Do’: Putin Opens up on Crimea Reunification Plan. RT, 10 March. https://www.rt.com/news/239197-putin-crimea-referendum-decision/. Accessed 10 February 2018.
  58. Reuter, O.J., and G.B. Robertson. 2012. Subnational Appointments in Authoritarian Regimes: Evidence from Russian Gubernatorial Appointments. Journal of Politics 74(4): 1023–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reuter, O.J., N. Buckley, A. Shubenkova, and G. Garifullina. 2016. Local Elections in Authoritarian Regimes: An Elite-Based Theory with Evidence from Russian Mayoral Elections. Comparative Political Studies 49(5): 662–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sasley, B. 2013. Emotions in International Relations. E-International Relations, 12 June. http://www.e-ir.info/2013/06/12/emotions-in-international-relations/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  61. Saurette, P. 2006. You Dissin Me? Humiliation and Post 9/11 Global Politics. Review of International Studies 32(3): 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sil, R., and P.J. Katzenstein. 2010. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York, NY: Macmillan International Higher Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sipher, J. 2017. The Steele Report, Revisited. Slate, 11 September. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/09/a_lot_of_the_steele_dossier_has_since_been_corroborated.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  64. Smyth, R. 2014. The Putin Factor: Personalism, Protest, and Regime Stability in Russia. Politics and Policy 42(2): 567–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 2017. SIPRI Arms Transfers Database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/armstransfers. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  66. The Steele Dossier. 2016. Company Intelligence Report 2016/80. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984/Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  67. Treisman, D. 2016. Why Putin Took Crimea: The Gambler in the Kremlin. Foreign Affairs 95(3): 47–54.Google Scholar
  68. Tsypkin, M. 2007. Terrorism’s Threat to New Democracies: The Case of Russia. In Reforming Intelligence: Obstacles to Democratic Control and Effectiveness, ed. T.C. Bruneau, and S.C. Boraz, 269–300. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  69. Tucker, P. 2016. Russia Wanted to be Caught, Says Company Waging War on the DNC Hackers. Defense One, 28 July. http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2016/07/Russia-wanted-to-be-caught/130312/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  70. Vitkovskaya, J., S. Granados, and J. Muyskens. 2017. The Post’s new findings in Russia’s bold campaign to influence the U.S. election. Washington Post, 11 July.Google Scholar
  71. Volkov, V. 2002. Violent Entrepreneurs: The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Walker, S.G. 1990. The Evolution of Operational Code Analysis. Political Psychology 11(2): 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weeks, J.L. 2014. Dictators at War and Peace. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wolhforth, W.C., and V.M. Zubok. 2017. An Abiding Antagonism: Realism, Idealism and the Mirage of Western-Russian Partnership after the Cold War. International Politics 54(4): 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Woods, K., J. Lacey, and W. Murray. 2006. Saddam’s Delusions: The View from the Inside. Foreign Affairs 85(3): 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yasmann, V. 2006. Russia: Corruption Scandal Could Shake Kremlin. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 26 September. https://www.rferl.org/a/1071621.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  77. Zimmerman, W. 2014. Ruling Russia: Authoritarianism from the Revolution to Putin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zygar, M. 2016. All the Kremlin’s Men: Inside the Court of Vladimir Putin. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science, Barnard CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations