Advertisement

International Politics

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 411–425 | Cite as

Institutional innovation of EU’s foreign and security policy: Big leap for EU’s strategic actorness or much ADO about nothing?

  • Monika SusEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The analysis takes stock of the recent institutional developments within European Union’s foreign and security policy and examines to what extent the Union has managed to overcome some of the substantial hinders in the way for its evolvement into a strategic actor. The paper scrutinizes the impact of the recent dynamics within EU’s foreign and security policy on Union’s strategic actorness within three benchmarks: (1) the capacity to extract resources from various EU’s foreign and security stakeholders, (2) the ability to relate these resources to EU’s objectives and to express them within a general strategic narrative, and (3) the implementation of the strategy in the light of changes in the global arena. The article shows that these three benchmarks have been advanced and now it is up to the Member States to engage with it and to make the leap towards a strategic actor possible.

Keywords

Strategic actorness European Union global strategy Strategic autonomy High representative 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I wish to acknowledge the financial support of the National Research Council (along the project decision: DEC-2013/09/B/HS5/01356).

References

  1. Aggestam, L. 2008. Introduction: Ethical power Europe? International Affairs 84: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, D., and M. Smith. 1990. Western Europe’s presence in the contemporary international arena. Review of International Studies 16: 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, D., and M. Smith. 2010. Strategic diplomacy in the European Union: Exploring relations with the BRIC countries, paper presented at the ECPR standing group on the European Union conference, Porto, 24–26 June 2010.Google Scholar
  4. Bendiek, A., and H. Kramer. 2010. The EU as a ‘strategic’ international actor: Substantial and analytical ambiguities. European Foreign Affairs Review 4: 453–474.Google Scholar
  5. Biscop, S. 2016 The EU global strategy: Realpolitik with European characteristics. Brussels: EGMONT Royal Institute for International Relations. Security Policy Brief no. 75.Google Scholar
  6. Biscop, S. 2009. The value of power, the power of values: A call for an EU grand strategy. Brussels, Egmont. Egmont Paper no. 33. Edited volume.Google Scholar
  7. Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 2006. The European Union as a global actor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 2013. A global actor past its peak? International Relations 27(3): 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosgrove-Sacks, C., and K. Twitchett. 1970. New international actors: United Nations and the European economic community. London: Maximilian.Google Scholar
  10. Council of the European Union. 2016. Implementation plan on security and defence, 14 November. https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eugs_implementation_plan_st14392.en16_0.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2017.
  11. Cross, M.D. 2011. Europe, a smart power? International Politics 48(6): 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijskra, H. 2016. Introduction: One-and-a-half cheers for the EU global strategy. Contemporary Security Policy 37(3): 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drieskens, E. 2017. Golden or gilded jubilee? A research agenda for actorness. Journal of European Public Policy 24(10): 1534–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EEAS. 2015. The European Union in a changing global environment. A more connected, contested and complex world. EU global strategy, 25 June. https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/strategic-review-european-union-changing-global-environment. Accessed 8 Oct 2017.
  15. EEAS. 2016. Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union’s foreign And security policy. Brussels, June.Google Scholar
  16. EEAS. 2017a. From shared vision to common action: Implementing the EU global strategy. Year 1. https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/sites/globalstrategy/files/full_brochure_year_1.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2017.
  17. EEAS. 2017b. Permanent structured cooperation—PESCO. Deepening defence cooperation among EU member states. Brussels: 19 October.Google Scholar
  18. Engelbrekt, K., and J. Hallenberg. 2007. The European Union: A Strategic Actor under Permanent Construction? Paper prepared for the ECPR Standing Group Conference, Turin, 12–15 September.Google Scholar
  19. EUISS. 2016. Towards an EU global strategy—Consulting the experts. Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. 2016. European defence action plan. Brussels, 30 November.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. 2017a. White paper of the future of Europe. Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/white_paper_on_the_future_of_europe_en.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct.
  22. European Commission. 2017b. Reflection paper on the future of European defence. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/reflection-paper-defence_en.pdf. Accessed 21 October.
  23. European Commission. 2017c. Press release. A European defence fund: €5.5 billion per year to boost Europe’s defence capabilities, 7 June. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-1508_en.htm. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.
  24. European Commission Public Opinion. 2017. Public opinion and a common defence and security policy among Member States. http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Chart/getChart/chartType/lineChart/themeKy/29/groupKy/181/savFile/195. Accessed 25 Oct.
  25. European Council. 2013. European council meeting—Conclusions. Brussels, 19–20 December.Google Scholar
  26. European Council. 2015. European council meeting—Conclusions, Brussels, 26 June.Google Scholar
  27. European Council. 2017. European council meeting—Conclusions, Brussels, 19 October.Google Scholar
  28. Falkner, R. 2017. Rethinking Europe’s external relations in an age of global turmoil: An introduction. International Politics 54(4): 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill, Ch. 1993. The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(3): 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoffmann, S. 2000. Towards a common foreign and security policy? Journal of International Affairs 38(2): 189–199.Google Scholar
  31. Howorth, J. 2009. ESDP: Implementing a Grand Strategy. In What ambitions for European defence in 2020?, ed. A. De Vasconcelos. Paris: EUISS.Google Scholar
  32. Howorth, J. 2010. The EU as a global actor: Grand strategy for a global grand bargain? Journal of Common Market Studies 48(3): 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howorth, J. 2016. EU global strategy in a changing world: Brussels’ approach to the emerging powers. Contemporary Security Policy 37(3): 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hyde-Price, A. 2004. European security, strategic culture, and the use of force. European Security 13(4): 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hyde-Price, A. 2006. Normative’ power Europe: A realist critique. Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Juncker, J.C. 2016. State of the Union 2016, 14 September 2016.Google Scholar
  37. Juncker, J.C. 2017. State of the Union 2017, 13 September 2017.Google Scholar
  38. Junker, J.C. 2014. A new start for Europe: My agenda for jobs, growth, fairness and democratic change political guidelines for the next European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/juncker-political-guidelines-speech_en.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov.
  39. Jupille, J., and J.A. Caporaso. 1998. States, agency, and rules: the European Union in global environmental politics. In The European Union in the World Community, ed. C. Rhodes, 213–229. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  40. Keating, D. 2015. Juncker calls for an EU army. European Voice, 3. September.Google Scholar
  41. Koenig, N., and Hass, J. 2017. The EU as 3-D power: should Europe spend more on diplomacy, development and defence. Berlin: Jacque Delores Institute, Policy Paper no. 206.Google Scholar
  42. Manners, I. 2002. Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marrone, A., Pirozzi, N., and Sartori, P. 2017. PESCO: An Ace in the hand for European Defence. Rome: IAI, 21 March.Google Scholar
  44. Merlingen, M. 2012. The EU security policy. What it is, how it works, why it matters. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  45. Mogherini, F. 2014. Answers to the European Parliament. Questionnaire to the commissioner-designate federica Mogherini high representative of the Union for foreign affairs and security policy vice-president of the commission. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/hearings-2014/resources/questions-answers/Hearings2014_Mogherini_Questionnaire_en.pdf. Accessed 4 October.
  46. Mogherini, F. 2015. Preface. In Towards an EU global strategy—Background, process, references, ed. A. Missiroli. Paris: EUISS.Google Scholar
  47. Moravcisk, A. 1999. A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation. International Organization 53(2): 267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Niemann, A., and C. Bretherton. 2013. EU external policy at the crossroads: The challenge of actorness and effectiveness. International Relations 27 (3): 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Novotna, T. 2017. The EU as a global actor: United we stand, divided we fall. Journal of Common Market Studies 55: 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Orbie, J. 2006. Civilian power Europe: Review of the original and current debates. Cooperation and Conflict 41(1): 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pomorska, K., and S. Vanhoonacker. 2016. Europe as a global actor: Searching for a new strategic approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 54: 204–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poushter, J., and D. Manevich. 2017. Globally, people point to ISIS and climate change as leading security threats. Concern about cyberattacks, world economy also widespread. Washington: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  53. Sjöstedt, G. 1977. The external role of the European community. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, M.E. 2011. A liberal grand strategy in a realist world? Power purpose and the EU’s changing global role. Journal of European Public Polic 18(2): 144–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, K. 2017. A European Union global strategy for a changing world? International Politics 54(4): 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, M., and H. Xie. 2010. The European Union and China: The logics of “strategic partnership”. Journal of Contemporary European Research 6(4): 432–448.Google Scholar
  57. Sus, M. 2016. Member states as strategy-maker or strategy-taker? Analyzing polish involvement in the development of the EU global strategy. Polish Political Science Yearbook 45: 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tocci, N. 2016. Interview with Nathalie Tocci on the global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. The International Spectator 51(3): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tocci, N. 2017. From the European security strategy to the EU global strategy: Explaining the journey. International Politics 54(4): 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Toje, A. 2008. The European Union as a small power, or conceptualizing Europe’s strategic actorness. Journal of European Integration 30(2): 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Von der Leyen, U. 2017. An ever closer military Union. Handelsblatt, 17 October. https://global.handelsblatt.com/opinion/an-ever-closer-military-union-eu-defense-european-union-germany-france-cooperation-von-der-leyen-nato-841045. Accessed 1 November.

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hertie School of GovernanceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations