What European army? Alliance, security community or postnational federation

Original Article
First Online:
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Jean-Claude Juncker’s proposal to create a ‘European army’ stood at the beginning of a process of revitalising the CSDP. Although it is too early to establish empirically based understanding of this development, theoretical thinking should be able to offer an interpretation of what the possible and desirable objectives of this development are. The concepts of alliance and security community provide such an interpretation. However, this article argues that their views on the state and defence integration did not adequately reflect the current project of the European Defence Union (EDU). Instead, Habermas’s conception of postnational federation is proposed as a better framework for understanding and critical assessment of the European military and defence integration in general, and the EDU in particular.

Keywords

European defence integration Common Security and Defence Policy Alliance Security community Postnational federation European Defence Union 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Czech Science Foundation under the standard research Grant No. GA 16-02288S.

References

  1. Adler, E. 1997. Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations. Millennium Journal of International Studies 26(2): 249–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, E., and M.N. Barnett. 1998. Security communities. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altfeld, M.F. 1984. The Decision to Ally: A Theory and Test. The Western Political Quarterly 37(4): 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayrault, J.-M., and F.-W. Steinmeier 2016. A strong Europe in a world of uncertainties. 28 June.Google Scholar
  5. Bickerton, C.J. 2011. Towards a Social Theory of EU Foreign and Security Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(1): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickerton, C.J., B. Irondelle, and A. Menon. 2011. Security Co-operation beyond the Nation-State: The EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blockmans, S., and G. Faleg. 2015. More union in European defence. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Bremberg, N. 2015. The European Union as Security Community-Building Institution: Venues, Networks and Co-operative Security Practices. Journal of Common Market Studies 53(3): 674–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castiglione, D. 2009. Political Identity in a Community of Strangers. In European Identity, ed. J.T. Checkel and P.J. Katzenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. CDU, CSU und FDP. 2009. Wachstum. Bildung. Zusammenhalt.: Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und FDP.Google Scholar
  11. CDU, CSU und SPD. 2013. Koalitionsvereinbarung CDU, CSU und SPD: AG Auswärtiges, Verteidigung, Entwicklungspolitik und Menschenrechte.Google Scholar
  12. Davis Cross, M.K. 2013. The Military Dimension of European Security: An Epistemic Community Approach. Millennium Journal of International Studies 42(1): 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deudney, D., and G.J. Ikenberry. 1993. The Logic of the West. World Policy Journal 10(4): 17–25.Google Scholar
  14. Deutsch, K.W. 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area; international organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ditrych, O. 2014. Security community: A future for a troubled concept? International Relations 28(3): 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DW. 2015. Juncker calls for collective EU army. 8 March.Google Scholar
  17. Dyson, T. 2013. Balancing Threat, not Capabilities: European Defence Cooperation as Reformed Bandwagoning. Contemporary Security Policy 34(2): 387–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dyson, T., and T. Konstadinides. 2013. European defence cooperation in EU law and IR theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EPSC. 2015. In Defence of Europe: Defence Integration as a Response to Europe’s Strategic Moment (No. Issue 4). European Political Strategy Centre.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. 2017. European Defence Fund: €5.5 billion per year to boost Europe’s defence capabilities (Press Reliease No. IP/17/1508). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  21. European Parliament. 2016a. Tuesday, 12 April 2016—Main aspects and basic choices of the common foreign and security policy and the common security and defence policy (Article 36 TEU) (Debate). Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  22. European Parliament. 2016b. Tuesday, 22 November 2016—Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (Debate). Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  23. European Parliament. 2016c. European Parliament resolution on the European Defence Union (No. P8_TA(2016)0435).Google Scholar
  24. Haas, E.B. 1961. International Integration: The European and the Universal Process. International Organization 15(3): 366–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Habermas, J. 1998. The European Nation-State: On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship. Public Culture 10(2): 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Habermas, J. 2001. The postnational constellation: Political essays. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Habermas, J. 2004. Why Europe needs a constitution. In Developing a Constitution for Europe, ed. E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum, and A. Menéndez. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Habermas, J. 2012. The crisis of the European Union: a response. (Cronin, C., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffmann, S. 1966. Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe. Daedalus 95(3): 862–915.Google Scholar
  30. Howorth, J. 2007. Security and defence policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howorth, J. 2010. The Political and Security Committee: A Case Study in “Supranational InterGovernmentalism”. Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po. (01/2010).Google Scholar
  32. HRVP/Head of EDA 2016. Implementation Plan on Security and Defence (No. 14392/16). Brussels: Council of the European Union.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, J.C. 2015. The cost of security Foreign policy concessions and military alliances. Journal of Peace Research 52(5): 665–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, S.G. 2007. The Rise of European Security Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kann, R.A. 1976. Alliances Versus Ententes. World Politics 28(4): 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kern, S. 2016. European Leaders Discuss Plan for European Army. New York: Gatestone Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Kim, T. 2011. Why Alliances Entangle But Seldom Entrap States. Security Studies 20(3): 350–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kurowska, X., and F. Breuer (eds.). 2012. Explaining the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy theory in action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Leeds, B.A., and S. Anac. 2005. Alliance Institutionalization and Alliance Performance. International Interactions 31(3): 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liska, G. 1962. Nations in alliance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mahony, H. 2015. EU commission chief makes case for European army. EUobserver, 9 March.Google Scholar
  42. Mandelbaum, M. 1981. The nuclear revolution: international politics before and after Hiroshima. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matlary, J.H., and Ø. Østerud (eds.). 2007. Denationalisation of defence convergence and diversity. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. McCormick, J.P. 2007. Weber, Habermas, and transformations of the European state: constitutional, social, and supranational democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mérand, F., S.C. Hofmann, and B. Irondelle. 2011. Governance and State Power: A Network Analysis of European Security. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(1): 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meyer, C.O. 2006. The quest for a European strategic culture: Changing norms on security and defence in the European Union. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morrow, J.D. 1991. Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. American Journal of Political Science 35(4): 904–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norheim-Martinsen, P.M. 2010. Beyond Intergovernmentalism: European Security and Defence Policy and the Governance Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 48(5): 1351–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ojanen, H. 2002. Theories at a Loss?: EU-NATO Fusion and the “low-politicisation” of Security and Defence in European Integration. Presented at the 43rd Annual ISA Convention New Orleans: Finnish Inst. of Internat. Affairs.Google Scholar
  50. Ojanen, H. 2006. The EU and Nato: Two Competing Models for a Common Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(1): 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paul, T.V. 2005. Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy. International Security 30(1): 46–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Posen, B.R. 2006. European Union Security and Defense Policy: Response to Unipolarity? Security Studies 15(2): 149–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Risse-Kappen, T. 1996. Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO. In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. P.J. Katzenstein. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rosamond, B. 2000. Theories of European integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  55. Schoen, H. 2008. Identity, Instrumental Self-Interest and Institutional Evaluations: Explaining Public Opinion on Common European Policies in Foreign Affairs and Defence. European Union Politics 9(1): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Selden, Z. 2010. Power is Always in Fashion: State-Centric Realism and the European Security and Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 48(2): 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singer, J.D., and M. Small. 1966. Formal Alliances, 1815-1939: A Quantitative Description. Journal of Peace Research 3(1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Snyder, G.H. 1984. The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics. World Politics 36(4): 461–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Snyder, G.H. 1990. Alliance theory: A neorealist first cut. Journal of International Affairs 44(1): 103–123.Google Scholar
  60. SPD. 2010. Transformation der Bundeswehr—Mehr Effizienz mit Augenmaß. Arbeitsgruppe Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik der SPD-Bundestagsfraktion.Google Scholar
  61. Telegraph. 2013. David Cameron fights off EU army plan. 19 December.Google Scholar
  62. UK Parliament. 2014. House of Commons Debate (7 Jan 2014). London: European Council.Google Scholar
  63. UK Parliament. 2016. European Committee B Debate (1 Feb 2016). London: Common Foreign and Security Policy.Google Scholar
  64. Walt, S.M. 1986. The origins of alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Walt, S.M. 1997. Why alliances endure or collapse. Survival 39(1): 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Welt. 2014a. Juncker fordert Aufbau einer europäischen Armee. 22 March.Google Scholar
  67. Welt. 2014b. Deutschland treibt das Projekt Europaarmee voran. 7 August.Google Scholar
  68. Welt. 2015a. Kommissionschef Juncker fordert eine EU-Armee. 8 March.Google Scholar
  69. Welt. 2015b. Jean-Claude Juncker: “Halten Sie sich an Frau Merkel!”. 3 August.Google Scholar
  70. Wendt, A. 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. The American Political Science Review 88(2): 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Williams, M.C., and I.B. Neumann. 2000. From alliance to security community: NATO, Russia, and the power of identity. Millennium Journal of International Studies 29(2): 357–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Political StudiesCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations