Advertisement

International Politics

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 272–287 | Cite as

Between soft power, neo-Westphalianism and transnationalism: the European Union, (trans)national interests and the politics of strategy

  • Neil WinnEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Can we speak of a joined up European Union (EU) Grand Strategy in the world? Strategy-based policy-making in the EU is a shared enterprise between the EU and its member state governments. The EU and its member states focus in the EUGS (Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe: a Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy, Brussels, http://www.eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf, 2016) on the EU homeland as a priority and not the Neighbourhood or the global level of diplomacy as was the case previously in the ESS (A secure Europe in a better world, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf, 2003). This is partly as a result of changing EU foreign policy priorities and partly as a result of the reassertion of national interests into the EU’s transnational foreign policy. EU Grand Strategy has shifted focus from the global to the regional level reflecting the new pragmatic turn in EU foreign policy. The new strategy is more regional, more pragmatic, and less ambitious in furthering the EU as a global actor as a result.

Keywords

European Union Grand strategy Security culture Transnationalism Sovereignty 

Notes

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this article was presented at the workshop “Geopolitics and strategic thinking in EU foreign policy” at the 3rd European Workshops in International Studies, 6–8 April 2016, University of Tübingen. I would like to thank the workshop organisers Cristian Nitoiu and Monika Sus for their thorough feedback and would also like to thank the workshop participants for their valuable comments. Thanks are also due to the International Politics anonymous reviewers and editors for their comprehensive and constructive comments.

References

  1. Al-Rodhan, N.R.F. 2009. Neo-statecraft and meta-geopolitics: Reconciliation of power, interests and justice in the 21st century. Berlin: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Altafin, C., C. Haász, and K. Podstawa. 2017. The new Global Strategy for the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy at a time of human rights crises. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 35 (2): 122–143.Google Scholar
  3. Baylis, J., J.J. Wirtz, and C.S. Gray (eds.). 2016. Strategy in the contemporary world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bickerton, C.J. 2011. Towards a social theory of EU Foreign and Security Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 171–190.Google Scholar
  5. Bickerton, C.J., B. Irondelle, and A. Menon. 2011. Security co-operation beyond the nation-state: The EU’s common security and defence policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
  6. Biscop, S. 2016. All or nothing? The EU global strategy and defence policy after Brexit. Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 431–445.Google Scholar
  7. Biscop, S., and J. Coelmont. 2011. Europe, strategy and armed forces—The making of a distinctive power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bull, H. 1977. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carrapico, H., and A. Barrinha. 2017. The EU as a coherent (cyber)security actor? Journal of Common Market Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12575.Google Scholar
  10. Ceccorulli, M., and S. Lucarelli. 2017. Migration and the EU global strategy: Narratives and Dilemmas. International Spectator 53 (2): 83–102.Google Scholar
  11. Charles, R., and P. Dauvergne. 2016. The rise of transnational governance as a field of study. International Studies Review 18: 415–437.Google Scholar
  12. Chappell, L. 2012. Germany, Poland and the common security and defence policy. Converging security and defence perspectives in an enlarged EU. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  13. Colemont, J. 2016. The EUGS: Realistic, but not too modest. Please, The International Spectator 51 (3): 9–11.Google Scholar
  14. Conley, H.A. 2016. The birth of a global strategy amid deep crisis. The International Spectator 51 (3): 12–14.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, R. 2000. The post-modern state and the world order. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, R. 2003. The breaking of nations: Order and Chaos in the twenty-first century. London: Atlantic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, R. 2016. The EU’s global strategy: Three quotations, LSE ideas policy brief: Dahrendorf Forum. http://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/EU-Global-Strategy-Robert-Cooper.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 17.
  18. Council of the European Union, European Security Strategy (ESS). 2003. A secure Europe in a better world. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 17.
  19. Dahl, R.A. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–215.Google Scholar
  20. Dassù, M., and R. Menotti. 2016. A post-Brexit global strategy. The International Spectator 51 (3): 15–16.Google Scholar
  21. Davis-Cross, M.K. 2016. The EU global strategy and diplomacy. Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 402–413.Google Scholar
  22. Davis-Cross, M.K. 2017. Counter-terrorism in the EU’s external relations. Journal of European Integration. 39 (5): 609–624.Google Scholar
  23. Dombrowski, P., and S. Reich. 2017. Does Donald Trump have a grand strategy? International Affairs 93 (5): 1013–1037.Google Scholar
  24. Drent, M. 2017. A shift in European security interests since the EU Global Strategy?. Clingendael Paper: Netherlands Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  25. European Council. 2016. Implementation plan on security and defence. Brussels: 12 Nov 2016. https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eugs_implementation_plan_st14392.en16_0.pdf. Accessed 17 July 17.
  26. European Union. 2016. Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe: A global strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Brussels. http://www.eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2017.
  27. European Union. 2017. From shared vision to common action: Implementing the EU Global strategy year 1. https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/sites/globalstrategy/files/full_brochure_year_1.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 17.
  28. Filho, M.T.F. 2007. Westphalia: A paradigm? A dialogue between law, art and philosophy of science. German Law Journal 8 (10): 955–975.Google Scholar
  29. Gaddis, J.L. (2009). What is grand strategy? In Keynote address to the conference ‘American Grand Strategy after War’, 26–28 February.Google Scholar
  30. Gaub, F., and N. Popescu (eds.). 2017. After the EU Global Strategy: Building resilience. Paris: EUISS.Google Scholar
  31. Grand, C. 2016. The EUGS: Good ambitions and harsh realities. The International Spectator 51 (3): 19–21.Google Scholar
  32. Hadfield, A. 2007. The EU and strategic culture: Virtual identity vs uploaded preferences. Journal of Contemporary European Research 1 (1): 59–72.Google Scholar
  33. Haglund, D.G. 2011. Let’s call the whole thing off? Security culture as strategic culture. Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 494–516.Google Scholar
  34. Haine, J.Y. 2011. The failure of a European strategic culture—EUFOR CHAD: The last of its kind? Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 582–603.Google Scholar
  35. Heinikoski, S. 2017. “Pool it or lose it?”—A contrastive analysis of discourses concerning EU military integration and demilitarisation in the Baltic Sea. Journal on Baltic Security 3 (1): 32–47.Google Scholar
  36. Hill, C. 1993. The capability–expectations gap or conceptualising Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (3): 305–328.Google Scholar
  37. Hill, C. 2003. The changing politics of foreign policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Hill, C. 2016. Foreign policy in the twenty-first century. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Hofmann, S. 2011. Why institutional overlap matters: CSDP in the European security architecture. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 101–120.Google Scholar
  40. Holsinger, B. 2007. Neomedievalism, neoconservatism, and the war on terror. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  41. Howorth, J. 2007. Security and defence policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  42. Howorth, J. 2010. The EU as a global actor: Grand Strategy for a global grand bargain? Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (3): 455–474.Google Scholar
  43. Howorth, J. 2016. EU global strategy in a changing world: Brussels’ approach to the emerging powers. Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 389–401.Google Scholar
  44. Hyde-Price, A. 2006. ‘Normative’ power Europe: A realist critique. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 217–234.Google Scholar
  45. Joseph, J. 2016. Governing through failure and Denial: The new resilience agenda. Millennium 44 (3): 370–390.Google Scholar
  46. Juncos, A. 2017. Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm. European Security 26 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
  47. Kaldor, M. 2000. Europe at the millennium. Politics 20 (2): 55–62.Google Scholar
  48. Kammel, A.H. 2011. Putting ideas into action: EU civilian crisis management in the Western Balkans. Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 625–643.Google Scholar
  49. Kempin, S., and J. Mawdsley. 2013. The common security and defence policy as an act of American hegemony. European Security Policy 22 (1): 55–73.Google Scholar
  50. Keohane, R.O., and J. Nye. 1972. Transnational relations and world politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Krasner, S.D. 2005. The case for shared sovereignty. Journal of Democracy 16 (1): 69–83.Google Scholar
  52. Kreutz, J. 2015. Human rights, geostrategy, and EU Foreign Policy, 1989–2008. International Organization 69 (1): 195–217.Google Scholar
  53. Lantis, J.S., and D. Howlett. 2016. Strategic culture. In Strategy in the contemporary world, ed. J. Baylis, J.J. Wirtz, and C.S. Gray, 84–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Malksoo, M. 2016. From ESS to the EU global strategy: External policy, internal purpose. Contemporary Security Policy. 37 (3): 374–388.Google Scholar
  55. Mamadu, H., and D.T. Studlar. 2009. Multilevel governance and shared sovereignty: European union, member states and the FTTC. Governance 22 (1): 73–97.Google Scholar
  56. Manners, I. 2002. Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.Google Scholar
  57. Mattelaer, A. 2013. The politico-military dynamics of European crisis response operations: Planning, friction, strategy. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Maull, H. 2016. Sadly, the EUGS reads more like a symptom of the problem than part of a solution for Europe’s deep crisis. The International Spectator 51 (3): 34–36.Google Scholar
  59. Mearsheimer, J. 1990. Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the cold war. International Security 15 (1): 5–56.Google Scholar
  60. Menon, A. 2008. The state of the union. London: Atlantic.Google Scholar
  61. Menon, A. 2009. Empowering paradise? The ESDP at ten. International Affairs 85 (2): 227–246.Google Scholar
  62. Menon, A. 2010. Defence. In The Oxford handbook of the European Union, ed. E. Jones, A. Menon, and S. Weatherill. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Menon, A. 2011a. Power, institutions and the CSDP: The promise of institutionalist theory. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 83–100.Google Scholar
  64. Menon, A. 2011b. European defence policy from Lisbon to Libya. Survival 53 (3): 75–90.Google Scholar
  65. Merand, F., S. Hoffmann, and B. Irondelle. 2011. Governance and state power: A network analysis of European security. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 121–147.Google Scholar
  66. Merlingen, M. 2011. From governance to governmentality in CSDP: Towards a foucauldian research agenda. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 149–169.Google Scholar
  67. Meyer, C. 2005. Convergence towards a European strategic culture? A constructivist framework for explaining changing norms. European Journal of International Relations 11 (4): 523–549.Google Scholar
  68. Meyer, C. 2006. The quest for a European strategic culture: Changing norms on security and defence in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  69. Meyer, C., and E. Strickmann. 2011. Solidifying constructivism: How material and ideational factors interact in European defence. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 61–81.Google Scholar
  70. Novotná, T. 2017. The EU as a global actor: United we stand, divided we fall. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (Special issue): 177–191.Google Scholar
  71. Norheim-Martinsen, P.M. 2011. EU strategic culture: When the means becomes the end. Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 517–534.Google Scholar
  72. Pentland, C.C. 2011. From words to deeds: Strategic culture and the European Union’s Balkan Military Missions. Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 551–566.Google Scholar
  73. Peters, I. 2011. Strategic culture and multilateralism: The interplay of the EU and the UN in conflict and crisis management. Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 644–666.Google Scholar
  74. Pischikova, K., and E. Piras. 2017. The European Union global strategy: What kind of foreign policy identity? International Spectator 57 (3): 103–120.Google Scholar
  75. Pomorska, K., and S. Vanhoonacker. 2016. Europe as a global actor: Searching for a new strategic approach. Journal of Common Market Studies Annual Review of the European Union in 2015 54 (1): 204–217.Google Scholar
  76. Pomorska, K., and G. Noutcheva. 2017. Europe as a regional actor: Waning influence in an unstable and authoritarian neighbourhood. Journal of Common Market Studies Annual Review of the European Union in 2016 2016 (55): 165–176.Google Scholar
  77. Priban, J. 2015. The semantics of constitutional sovereignty in post-sovereign “new” Europe: A case study of the Czech Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence. International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (1): 180–199.Google Scholar
  78. Rogers, J.M. 2009. From ‘Civilian Power’ to ‘Global Power’: Explicating the European Union’s ‘Grand Strategy’ through the articulation of discourse theory. Journal of Common Market Studies 47 (4): 831–862.Google Scholar
  79. Rynning, S. 2011a. Strategic culture and the common security and defence policy—A classical realist assessment and critique. Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 535–550.Google Scholar
  80. Rynning, S. 2011b. Realism and the common security and defence policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 23–42.Google Scholar
  81. Schmidt, P. 2011. The EU’s military involvement in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Security culture, interests and games. Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 567–581.Google Scholar
  82. Schmidt, P., and B. Zyla. 2011. European security policy: Strategic culture in operation? Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 484–493.Google Scholar
  83. Schmidt, P., and B. Zyla. 2013. European Security Policy: Strategic culture in operation? In European Security Policy and strategic culture, ed. P. Schmidt, and B. Zyla, 1–10. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Sicurelli, D. 2016. The European union’s Africa policies: Norms, interests and impact. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Simon, L. 2012. CSDP, strategy and crisis management: Out of area or out of business. The International Spectator 47 (3): 100–115.Google Scholar
  86. Smith, K.E. 2017. A European Union Global strategy for a changing world. International Politics 54: 503–518.Google Scholar
  87. Smith, M.E. 2011. Liberal Grand Strategy in a realist world? Power, purpose and the EU’s changing global role. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 144–163.Google Scholar
  88. Smith, M.E. 2016. Implementing the global strategy where it matters most: The EU’s credibility deficit and the European neighbourhood. Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 446–460.Google Scholar
  89. Snyder, J. 1977. The Soviet strategic culture: Implications for nuclear operations. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
  90. Speakman, E.M., M. McKee, and R. Coker. 2017. If not now, when? Time for the European Union to define a global health strategy. The Lancet Global Health 5 (4): 392–393.Google Scholar
  91. Tilly, C. 1990. Coercion, capital and European States: AD 990-1990. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  92. Tocci, N. 2016. The making of the EU global strategy. Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 461–472.Google Scholar
  93. Tocci, N. 2017a. From the European security strategy to the EU global strategy: Explaining the journey. International Politics 54 (4): 487–502.Google Scholar
  94. Tocci, N. 2017b. Framing the EU’s global strategy: A stronger Europe in a Fragile world. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  95. Toje, A. 2011. The European Union as a small power. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 43–60.Google Scholar
  96. Verdun, A. 2013. Decision-making before and after Lisbon: The impact of changes in decision-making rules. West European Politics 36 (6): 1128–1142.Google Scholar
  97. Wagner, W., and R. Anholt. 2016. Resilience as the EU global strategy’s Leitmotif: Pragmatic, problematic or promising? Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 414–430.Google Scholar
  98. Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  99. Webber, D. 2014. Declining power Europe? The evolution of the EU’s power in world power in the early 21st century. Working Paper 14/1: Monash European and EU Centre.Google Scholar
  100. Winn, N. (ed.). 2004. Neo-medievalism and civil war. London: Cass.Google Scholar
  101. Winn, N. 2013. European Union Grand Strategy and defense: Strategy, sovereignty, and political union. International Affairs Forum 4 (2): 174–179.Google Scholar
  102. Winn, N. and S. Gänzle. 2017. Die Globale Strategie für die Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik der Europäischen Union – Zentralasien und der Südkaukasus: vom normativen Ansatz zum ,,prinzipiengeleiteten Pragmatismus“. Integration 12 (4): 308–318.Google Scholar
  103. Zyla, B. 2011. Overlap or opposition? EU and NATO’s strategic (sub-) culture. Contemporary Security Policy 32 (3): 667–687.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics and International StudiesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations