International Politics

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 338–355 | Cite as

US elite power and the rise of ‘statist’ Chinese elites in global markets

Original Article

Abstract

The rise of Chinese ‘state capitalism’ such as expressed by the global expansion of Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) has been met with substantial suspicion on the part of the Western corporate and political establishment—including among Washington’s policy-making elite. The underpinning claim that the rise of SOEs would impair market mechanisms, we argue, is, however, theoretically problematic and empirically incorrect. Taking the example of the global oil and gas sector, the article illustrates that at firm level major corporations from rising powers, such as China, increasingly cooperate with Western firms, including with American oil majors. In that sense, Chinese firms participate in capitalist competition just as any Western firm. The roots of the assumed threat posed by China’s rise, we argue, must rather be situated in the distinctive nature of the state-capital nexus in the USA and China, respectively, and the configuration of elite networks underpinning this nexus. We will illustrate this by analysing the social networks in which directors of major Chinese and US oil firms are embedded, including the networks of corporate ties, affiliations with (transnational) policy planning bodies and state-business ties.

Keywords

Corporate elite networks China’s rise State-capital nexus Social network analysis Oil companies State-owned enterprises (SOEs) 

References

  1. Andrews-Speed, Philip, and Ronald Dannreuther. 2011. China, oil and global politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bijian, Zheng. 2005. China’s peaceful rise to great-power status. Foreign Affairs 84 (5): 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bremmer, Ian. 2008. The return of state capitalism. Survival 50 (3): 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bremmer, Ian. 2009. State capitalism comes of age. The end of the free market? Foreign Affairs 88 (3): 40–56.Google Scholar
  5. Breslin, Shaun. 2013. China and the global order: Signalling threat or friendship? International Affairs 89 (3): 615–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton V. Freeman. 2002. Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, William K. 2010. The making of a transnational capitalist class: Corporate power in the 21st century. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, William K., and Meindert Fennema. 2002. Is there a transnational business community? International Sociology 17 (3): 393–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, William K., and Colin Carson. 2003. The network of global corporations and elite policy groups: A structure for transnational capitalist class formation? Global Networks 3 (1): 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Graaff, Nana. 2011. A global energy network? The expansion and integration of non-triad national oil companies. Global Networks 11 (2): 262–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Graaff, Nana. 2013. Towards a hybrid global energy order. State-owned oil companies, corporate elite networks and governance. unpublished manuscript, PhD diss., Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. De Graaff, Nana. 2014. Global networks and the two faces of Chinese national oil companies. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 13 (5–6): 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Domhoff, William G. 1967. Who rules America?. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Domhoff, William G. 2009. Who rules America? Challenges to corporate and class dominance. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Downs, Erica. 2007a. The fact and fiction of Sino–African energy relations. China Security 3 (2): 42–69.Google Scholar
  16. Downs, Erica. 2007b. China’s quest for overseas oil. Far Eastern Economic Review 170 (7): 52–56.Google Scholar
  17. Downs, Erica. 2008. Business interest groups in Chinese politics: The case of the oil companies. In China’s changing political landscape. Prospects for democracy, ed. L. Cheng, 121–141. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  18. Energy Intelligence Group. 2013. Petroleum intelligence weekly, PIW Top 50. November 2013, p. 2.Google Scholar
  19. Heemskerk, Eelke M. 2013. The rise of the European corporate elite: Evidence from the network of interlocking directorates in 2005 and 2010. Economy and Society 42 (1): 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holslag, Jonathan. 2006. China’s new mercantilism in central Africa. African and Asian Studies 5 (2): 133–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ikenberry, G.John. 2008. The rise of China: Power, institutions and the western order. In China’s ascent: Power, security, and the future of international politics, ed. Robert S. Ross, and Zhu Feng. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kagan, Robert. 2006. League of dictators? The Washington Post, April 30.Google Scholar
  23. Kahler, Miles. 2013. Rising powers and global governance: Negotiating change in a resilient status quo. International Affairs 89 (3): 711–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kong, Bo. 2010. China’s international petroleum policy. Santa Barbara: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  25. Mearsheimer, John. 2010. The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3: 381–396. doi: 10.1093/cjip/poq016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McNally, Christopher A. 2012. Sino-capitalism. China’s re-emergence and the international political economy. World Politics 64: 741–766. doi: 10.1017/S0043887112000202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nölke, Andreas, Tobias ten Brink, Simone Claar, and Christian May. 2015. Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies. European Journal of International Relations 21 (3): 538–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rachman, Gideon. 2008. Illiberal capitalism: Russia and China chart their own course. Financial Times, January 8.Google Scholar
  29. Rachman, Gideon. 2012. The end of the win–win world. Why China’s rise is bad for the US—and other dark forces. Foreign Policy. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/24/the_end_of_the_win_win_world.
  30. Scott, John, and Peter J. Carrington (eds.). 2011. The Sage handbook of social network analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Shambaugh, David. 2013. China goes global. The Partial Power. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stephens, Philip. 2013. China has thrown down a gauntlet to America. Financial Times, Comment, November 28.Google Scholar
  33. Stephen, Matthew D. 2014. Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge. European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 912–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ten Brink, Tobias. 2013. Paradoxes of prosperity in China’s new capitalism. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 42 (3): 17–44.Google Scholar
  35. The Economist. 2012a. New masters of the universe. How state enterprise is spreading. Special Report: State Capitalism.Google Scholar
  36. The Economist. 2012b. The visible hand. Special Report: State Capitalism.Google Scholar
  37. Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan. 2002. Transnational capitalism and the struggle over European integration. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan, Naná de Graaff, and Henk Overbeek. 2012. The Reconfiguration of the global state-capital Nexus. Globalizations 9 (4): 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan, and Nana De Graaff. 2014. Corporate elite networks and US post-cold war grand strategy from Clinton to Obama. European Journal of International Relations 20 (1): 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan, and Naná de Graaff. 2016. American grand strategy and corporate elite networks. The open door and its variations since the end of the cold war. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Yong, Wang, and Louis Pauly. 2013. Chinese IPE debates on (American) hegemony. Review of International Political Economy 20 (6): 1165–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zweig, David, and Bi Jianhai. 2005. China’s global hunt for energy. Foreign Affairs 84 (5): 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Faculty of Social SciencesVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations