When do refugees matter? The importance of issue salience for digital advocacy organizations
Digital advocacy organizations are permanent institutions which can rapidly mobilize people online and offline. Scholars are beginning to examine these organizations’ distinctive mode of advocacy within national contexts. However, we know relatively little about how these organizations select their campaigns, and when they successfully mobilize the public on international issues. This is important as most advocacy targets national decision-makers, rather than international institutions. This article asks: how do digital advocacy organizations select the issues they campaign on? It examines refugee campaigns across seven organizations in seven different countries (Australia, Austria, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA) between late 2015 and 2017. It draws on extensive primary research, including a dozen interviews with digital activists, journalists, and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). It finds that digital advocacy organizations choose campaigns based on issuesalience, whereas traditional NGOs are driven by issue-expertise. Professional staff select campaigns in NGOs, whereas in digital advocacy organizations campaign decision-making is member-driven. Overall, this paper calls for International Relations (IR) and interest group scholars to examine campaign selection and decision-making in all advocacy organizations.
KeywordsDigital advocacy Mobilizing Advocacy organizations NGOs Refugees
The author would like to thank the participants of the Stockholm workshop on Advocacy Groups in Global Governance: Global and Domestic Opportunity Structures, in particular Kirsten Lucas, Elizabeth Bloodgood, and Lisa Dellmuth. A special thanks to Rebecca John for her excellent research assistance and feedback on this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Australian Associated Press. 2017. Australia’s Top 20 Power-Brokers News.Com.Au. http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/australias-top-20-powerbrokers/news-story/1befd0a99d89672707750b56a81c7c.
- Bourke, Latikia. 2015. Change of Heart: Abbott Government Agrees to Accept 12,000 Syrian Refugees. Sydney Morning Herald. 09 Sept 2015.Google Scholar
- Brady, Sarah. 2016. Irish “Pledge a Bed” for Refugees Campaign is Overwhelmed with Offers. Independent.ie, 03 Sept 2016.Google Scholar
- Colmar Brunton. 2016. Community Perceptions of Migrants and Immigration. Report for Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). Wellington: MBIE. December 2016.Google Scholar
- Connor, Philip. 2016. Number of Refugees to Europe Surges to Record 1.3 Million in 2015. Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project. Google Scholar
- Dellmuth, Lisa M., and Elizabeth A. Bloodgood. (this issue). Advocacy Group Effects in Global Governance: Populations, Strategies, and Political Opportunity Structures. Interest Groups and Advocacy.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2018. Public Opinion in the European Union (No. Standard Eurobarometer 89). Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Hall, Nina. 2017a. Innovations in Activism in the Digital Era: Campaigning for Refugee Rights in 2015—2016. In The Governance Report 2017, Democracy, Innovations, Participation, Legitimacy, Indicators, ed. Helmut Anheier, 143–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hall, Nina. 2017b. People Power, Populism and the Internet. In Global Policy Online, 11 July 2017.Google Scholar
- Hall, Nina and Phil Ireland. 2016. Transforming Activism: Digital Era Advocacy Organizations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6 July 2016. http://ssir.org/articles/entry/transforming_activism_digital_era_advocacy_organizations.
- Henry, Laura A., Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom, Carla Winston, and Priya Bala-Miller. (this issue). NGO Participation in Global Governance Institutions: International and Domestic Drivers of Engagement. Interest Groups and Advocacy.Google Scholar
- Jordan, Grant, and William A. Maloney. 1998. Manipulating Membership: Supply-Side Influences on Group Size. British Journal of Political Science 28: 389–409.Google Scholar
- Karpf, David. 2016. Analytic Activism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Kelly, Joe. 2018. GetUp! Makes Adani’s Demise Its Major Goal for 2018. The Australian. 1 April 2018.Google Scholar
- Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Lake, David G. and Wendy Wong. 2009. The Politics of Networks: Interests, Power, and Human Rights Norms. In Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance, ed. Miles Kahler. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/?GCOI=80140100115180.Google Scholar
- Markus, Andrew. 2017. Mapping Social Cohesion: The Scanlon Foundation Surveys 2017. Caulfield East: Monash.Google Scholar
- Markus, Andrew. 2011. Immigration and Public Opinion. In A “Sustainable” Population?—Key Policy Issues. Canberra: Australian Government—Productivity Commission. https://www.pc.gov.au/research/supporting/sustainable-population/01-population-preliminaries.pdf. https://www.pc.gov.au/research/supporting/sustainable-population.
- McDonnell, Mary. 2015. Over 6,000 Irish People Pledge to Home Refugees, newstalk.com. 4 September 2015. http://www.newstalk.com/reader/47.301/54585/0/. Accessed 7 Sept 16.
- Murphy, Katherine. 2016. Turnbull Government Launches Sweeping Inquiry into Donations. The Guardian, 14 Sept 2018.Google Scholar
- Nathan, Matt. 2015. Aylan Kurdi: David Cameron Says He Felt “Deeply Moved” by Images of Dead Syrian Boy But Gives No Details of Plans to Take in More Refugees. The Independent. 3 Sept 2015.Google Scholar
- Newport, Frank. 2018. Immigration Surges to Top of Most Important Problem List [WWW Document]. Gallup.com. https://news.gallup.com/poll/237389/immigration-surges-top-important-problem-list.aspx. Accessed 24 July 2018.
- Princen, Thomas. 1995. Ivory, Conservation, and Environmental Transnational Coalitions. In Bringing Transnational Relations Back, ed. Thomas Risse-Kappen, 227–254. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/bringing-transnational-relations-back-in/46897C34ACC7D3A341D52CD73AD692D3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sikkink, Kathryn. 2005. Patterns of Dynamic Multilevel Governance. In Transnational Protest and Global Activism, ed. Donatella Della Porta and Sidney G. Tarrow. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Silberman, Michael. 2017. Five Years of Building People Power at Greenpeace. Mobilisation Lab. https://mobilisationlab.org/burning-platform-building-people-power/. Accessed 20 April 18.
- Stroup, Sarah, and Wendy Wong. 2017. The Authority Trap: Strategic Choices of International NGOs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Yanacopulos, Helen. 2009. Cutting the Diamond: Networking Economic Justice. In Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance, ed. Miles Kahler, 67–78. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar