Advertisement

Interest Groups & Advocacy

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 91–119 | Cite as

Interest group coalitions: how the intensity of cooperation affects the choice of lobbying strategies

  • Florian WeilerEmail author
  • Jonas Reißmann
Original Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

How does the intensity of cooperating in lobbying coalitions affect the choice of lobbying strategies of interest groups? This question is analysed in this paper using data from 1117 Swiss and German interest organisations. We find, on the one hand, that the intensity of coalition building affects both directly targeting politicians (insider lobbying) but also indirect efforts of exerting influence via the media and citizens (outsider lobbying). In other words, the more intensely lobby groups cooperate, the more they make use of both insider and outsider lobbying tactics. However, we also find that the increase in these two types of lobbying efforts is not equal when cooperation intensifies. Due to the specific advantages of pooling expertise, insider lobbying benefits disproportionately when groups work more closely together.

Keywords

Lobbying coalitions Lobbying cooperation Lobbying strategies Insider lobbying Outsider lobbying 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ainsworth, Scott H. 2002. Analyzing Interest Groups: Group Influence on People and Policies. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Austen-Smith, David. 1993. Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 799–833.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 2001. Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics. The Journal of Politics 63(4): 1191–1213.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, Jeffrey M. 1977. Lobbying for the People. The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beyers, Jan. 2004. Voice and Access: Political Practices of European Interest Associations. European Union Politics 5(2): 211–240.Google Scholar
  9. Beyers, Jan, and Caelesta Braun. 2014. Ties that Count: Explaining Interest Group Access to Policymakers. Journal of Public Policy 34(1): 93–121.Google Scholar
  10. Beyers, Jan, and Iskander De Bruycker. 2018. Lobbying Makes (Strange) Bedfellows: Explaining the Formation and Composition of Lobbying Coalitions in EU Legislative Politics. Political Studies 66(4): 959–984.Google Scholar
  11. Binderkrantz, Anne. 2008. Different Groups, Different Strategies: How Interest Groups Pursue Their Political Ambitions. Scandinavian Political Studies 31(2): 173–200.Google Scholar
  12. Binderkrantz, Anne, and Simon Krøyer. 2012. Customizing Strategy: Policy Goals and Interest Group Strategies. Interest Groups & Advocacy 1(1): 115–138.Google Scholar
  13. Broscheid, Andreas, and David Coen. 2007. Lobbying Activity and Fora Creation in the EU: Empirically Exploring the Nature of the Policy Good. Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 346–365.Google Scholar
  14. Browne, William P. 1990. Organized Interests and Their Issue Niches: A Search for Pluralism in a Policy Domain. The Journal of Politics 52(2): 477–509.Google Scholar
  15. Carpenter, Daniel P., Kevin M. Esterling, and David M.J. Lazer. 1998. The Strength of Weak Ties in Lobbying Networks. Evidence from Health-Care Politics in the United States. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10(4): 417–444.Google Scholar
  16. Chalmers, Adam William. 2013. Trading Information for Access: Informational Lobbying Strategies and Interest Group Access to the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 20(1): 39–58.Google Scholar
  17. Cranmer, Skyler J., and Bruce A. Desmarais. 2011. Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models. Political Analysis 19(1): 66–86.Google Scholar
  18. Cranmer, Skyler J., Philip Leifeld, Scott D. McClurg, and Meredith Rolfe. 2017. Navigating the Range of Statistical Tools for Inferential Network Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 237–251.Google Scholar
  19. Crombez, Christophe. 2002. Information, Lobbying and the Legislative Process in the European Union. European Union Politics 3(1): 7–32.Google Scholar
  20. De Bruycker, Iskander. 2016. Pressure and Expertise: Explaining the Information Supply of Interest Groups in EU Legislative Lobbying. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54(3): 599–616.Google Scholar
  21. Dür, Andreas, and Dirk De Bièvre. 2007. Inclusion without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy. Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 79–101.Google Scholar
  22. Dür, Andreas, and Gemma Mateo. 2012. ‘Who Lobbies the European Union? National Interest Groups in a Multilevel Polity. Journal of European Public Policy 19(7): 969–987.Google Scholar
  23. Dür, Andreas, and Gemma Mateo. 2013. ‘Gaining Access or Going Public? Interest Group Strategies in Five European Countries. European Journal of Political Research 52(5): 660–686.Google Scholar
  24. Eising, Rainer. 2007. Institutional Context, Organizational Resources and Strategic Choices: Explaining Interest Group Access in the European Union. European Union Politics 8(3): 329–362.Google Scholar
  25. Fischer, Manuel, and Pascal Sciarini. 2016. Drivers of Collaboration in Political Decision Making: A Cross-Sector Perspective. The Journal of Politics 78(1): 63–74.Google Scholar
  26. Gais, Thomas L., and Jack L. Walker. 1991. Pathways to Influence in American Politics. In Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements, ed. Jack L. Walker, 103–121. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  27. Godwin, Ken, Scott H. Ainsworth, and Erik Godwin. 2013. Lobbying and Policymaking: The Public Pursuit of Private Interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1998. To Lobby Alone or in a Flock. Foraging Behavior Among Organized Interests. American Politics Quarterly 26(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
  29. Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, Richard L., and Alan V. Deardorff. 2006. Lobbying As Legislative Subsidy. American Political Science Review 100(1): 69–84.Google Scholar
  31. Hanegraaff, Marcel, Jan Beyers, and Iskander De Bruycker. 2016. Balancing Inside and Outside Lobbying: The Political Strategies of Lobbyists at Global Diplomatic Conferences. European Journal of Political Research 55: 568–588.Google Scholar
  32. Heaney, Michael T. 2006. Brokering Health Policy: Coalitions, Parties, and Interest Group Influence. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 31(5): 887–944.Google Scholar
  33. Heaney, Michael T., and Philip Leifeld. 2018. Contributions by Interest Groups to Lobbying Coalitions. The Journal of Politics 80(2): 494–509.Google Scholar
  34. Heaney, Michael T., and Geoffrey M. Lorenz. 2013. Coalition Portfolios and Interest Group Influence over the Policy Process. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2(3): 251–277.Google Scholar
  35. Hojnacki, Marie. 1997. Interest Groups’ Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone. American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 61–87.Google Scholar
  36. Hojnacki, Marie. 1998. Organized Interests’ Advocacy Behavior in Alliances. Political Research Quarterly 51(2): 437–459.Google Scholar
  37. Hojnacki, Marie, and David C. Kimball. 1998. Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress. The American Political Science Review 92(4): 775–790.Google Scholar
  38. Holyoke, Thomas T. 2009. Interest Group Competition and Coalition Formation. American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 360–375.Google Scholar
  39. Hula, Kevin W. 1999. Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Keeter, Scott, Courtney Kennedy, Michael Dimock, Jonathan Best, and Peyton Craighill. 2006. Gauging the Impact of Growing Nonresponse on Estimates from a National RDD Telephone Survey. The Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 759–779.Google Scholar
  41. Kerwin, Cornelius, Scott Furlong, and William West. 2010. Interest Groups, Rulemaking, and American Bureaucracy. In The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy, ed. Robert F. Durant, 590–611. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Klüver, Heike. 2011. The Contextual Nature of Lobbying: Explaining Lobbying Success in the European Union. European Union Politics 12(4): 483–506.Google Scholar
  43. Klüver, Heike. 2012. Biasing politics? Interest Group Participation in EU Policy-Making’. West European Politics 35(5): 1114–1133.Google Scholar
  44. Klüver, Heike. 2013. Lobbying in the European Union. Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions, and Policy Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Anke Tresch, and Margit Jochum. 2007. Going Public in the European Union: Action Repertoires of Western European Collective Political Actors. Comparative Political Studies 40(1): 48–73.Google Scholar
  46. Leech, Beth L., Frank R. Baumgartner, Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, and David C. Kimball. 2002. Organized Interests and Issue Definition in Policy Debates. In Interest Group Politics, ed. Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  47. Leifeld, Philip, and Volker Schneider. 2012. Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 731–744.Google Scholar
  48. Lubell, Mark, Mark Schneider, John T. Scholz, and Mihriye Mete. 2002. Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 148–163.Google Scholar
  49. Mahoney, Christine. 2007a. Lobbying Success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 35–56.Google Scholar
  50. Mahoney, Christine. 2007b. Networking vs. Allying: The Decision of Interest Groups to Join Coalitions in the US and the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 366–383.Google Scholar
  51. Mahoney, Christine. 2008. Brussels Versus the Beltway. Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mahoney, Christine, and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2015. Partners in Advocacy: Lobbyists and Government Officials in Washington. The Journal of Politics 77(1): 202–215.Google Scholar
  53. Nelson, David, and Susan Webb Yackee. 2012. Lobbying Coalitions and Government Policy Change: An Analysis of Federal Agency Rulemaking. The Journal of Politics 74(2): 339–353.Google Scholar
  54. Oeckl, Albert. 2010. Taschenbuch des öffentlichen Lebens: Deutschland 2010. Bonn: Festland Verlag.Google Scholar
  55. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Ornstein, Norman J., and Shirley Elder. 1978. Interest Groups, Lobbying and Policymaking. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pijnenburg, Bert. 1998. EU Lobbying by Ad Hoc Coalitions: An Exploratory Case Study. Journal of European Public Policy 5(2): 303–321.Google Scholar
  58. Potters, Jan, and Frans Van Winden. 1992. Lobbying and Asymmetric Information. Public Choice 74: 269–292.Google Scholar
  59. Richards, John, and Jack Heard. 2005. European Environmental NGOs: Issues, Resources and Strategies in Marine Campaigns. Environmental Politics 14(1): 23–41.Google Scholar
  60. Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science 13(1): 1–32.Google Scholar
  61. Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and John T. Tierney. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  62. Schwabe. 2009. Publicus 2010. Schweizer Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Lebens. Basel: Schwabe Basel.Google Scholar
  63. Sciarini, Pascal. 2014. Eppure Si Muove: The Changing Nature of the Swiss Consensus Democracy. Journal of European Public Policy 21(1): 116–132.Google Scholar
  64. Sorurbakhsh, Laila. 2016. Interest Group Coalitions and Lobbying Environments: Toward a New Theoretical Perspective. Interest Groups & Advocacy 5(3): 200–223.Google Scholar
  65. Thrall, A.Trevor. 2006. The Myth of the Outside Strategy: Mass Media News Coverage of Interest Groups. Political Communication 23: 407–420.Google Scholar
  66. Van Buuren, Stef, and Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn. 2011. MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software 45(3): 1–67.Google Scholar
  67. Weiler, Florian. 2016. Lobbygruppen im politischen Wettbewerb: Die Auswirkungen des Konkurrenzkampfes unter Interessengruppen auf deren Lobbyverhalten. Swiss Political Science Review 22(2): 321–352.Google Scholar
  68. Weiler, Florian, and Matthias Brändli. 2015. Inside Versus Outside Lobbying: How the Institutional Framework Shapes the Lobbying Behavior of Interest Groups. European Journal of Political Research 54(4): 745–766.Google Scholar
  69. Whitford, Andrew B. 2003. The Structures of Interest Coalitions: Evidence from Environmental Litigation. Business and Politics 5(1): 45–64.Google Scholar
  70. Wilson, James Q. 1973. Political Organizations. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  71. Wolpe, Bruce C. 1990. Lobbying Congress. How the System Works. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.Google Scholar
  72. Wonka, Arndt, Frank R. Baumgartner, Christine Mahoney, and Joost Berkhout. 2010. Measuring the Size and Scope of the EU Interest Group Population. European Union Politics 11(3): 463–476.Google Scholar
  73. Yackee, Jason, and Susan Yackee. 2006. A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy. The Journal of Politics 68(1): 128–139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of BambergBambergGermany

Personalised recommendations