Advertisement

The Economics and Politics of Revoking NAFTA

  • Raphael A. Auer
  • Barthélémy Bonadio
  • Andrei A. LevchenkoEmail author
RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

We provide a quantitative assessment of both the aggregate and the distributional effects of revoking NAFTA using a multi-country, multi-sector, multi-factor model of world production and trade with global input–output linkages. Revoking NAFTA would reduce US welfare by about 0.2%, and Canadian and Mexican welfare by about 2%. The distributional impacts of revoking NAFTA across workers in different sectors are an order of magnitude larger in all three countries, ranging from − 2.7 to 2.23% in the USA. We combine the quantitative results with information on the geographic distribution of sectoral employment, and compute average real wage changes in each US congressional district, Mexican state, and Canadian province. We then examine the political correlates of the economic effects. Congressional district-level real wage changes are negatively correlated with the Trump vote share in 2016: districts that voted more for Trump would on average experience greater real wage reductions if NAFTA is revoked.

JEL Classification

F11 F13 F16 F62 J62 R13 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to our discussant Kei-Mu Yi, Stijn Claessens and workshop participants at the BIS, the IMF ARC, University of Bayreuth and the Standing Field Committee in International Economics at the Verein für Socialpolitik for helpful comments, and to Julieta Contreras for excellent research assistance. The views expressed in this study do not necessarily reflect those of the Bank for International Settlements.

References

  1. Artuç, Erhan, Shubham Chaudhuri, and John McLaren. 2010. Trade Shocks and Labor Adjustment: A Structural Empirical Approach. American Economic Review 100(3):1008–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson. 2013. The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review 103(6):2121–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caliendo, Lorenzo, and Fernando Parro. 2015. Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA. Review of Economic Studies 82(1):1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costinot, Arnaud, and Andrés Rodríguez-Clare. 2014. Trade Theory with Numbers: Quantifying the Consequences of Globalization, Chapter 4. In Handbook of International Economics, 4, ed. Gita Gopinath, Elhanan Helpman, and Kenneth Rogoff, 197–261. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. de Gortari, Alonso. 2019. Disentangling Global Value Chains. Dartmouth: Mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deardorff, Alan V., and Robert M. Stern. 1990. Computational Analysis of Global Trading Arrangements. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dekle, Robert, Jonathan Eaton, and Samuel Kortum. 2008. Global Rebalancing with Gravity: Measuring the Burden of Adjustment. IMF Staff Papers 55(3):511–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhingra, Swati, Hanwei Huang, Gianmarco Ottaviano, João Paulo Pessoa, Thomas Sampson, and John Van Reenen. 2017. The Costs and Benefits of Leaving the EU: Trade Effects. Economic Policy 32(92):651–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dix-Carneiro, Raphael. 2014. Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics. Econometrica 83(3):825–885.Google Scholar
  10. Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel S. Kortum. 2002. Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica 70(5):1741–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Felbermayr, Gabriel, Marina Steininger, Erdal Yalcin, et al. 2017. Global Impact of a Protectionist US Trade Policy. Munich: ifo Forschungsberichte.Google Scholar
  12. Galle, Simon, Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, and Moises Yi. 2017. Slicing the Pie: Quantifying the Aggregate and Distributional Effects of Trade. New York: Mimeo, BI Norwegian Business School, UC Berkeley, and US Census Bureau.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, Glenn W., Thomas F. Rutherford, and David G. Tarr. 1997. Quantifying the Uruguay Round. The Economic Journal 107(444):1405–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hertel, Thomas W. (ed.). 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, Ronald. 1971. A Three-Factor Model in Theory, Trade, and History. In Trade, Balance of Payments, and Growth: Papers in International Economics in Honor of Charles P, ed. Jagdish Bhagwati. Kindleberger. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  16. Levchenko, Andrei A., and Jing Zhang. 2013. The Global Labor Market Impact of Emerging Giants: A Quantitative Assessment. IMF Economic Review 61(3):479–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levchenko, Andrei A., and Jing Zhang. 2016. The Evolution of Comparative Advantage: Measurement and Welfare Implications. Journal of Monetary Economics 78:96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mussa, Michael. 1974. Tariffs and the Distribution of Income: The Importance of Factor Specificity, Substitutability, an Intensity in the Short and Long Run. Journal of Political Economy 82:1191–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Timmer, Marcel P., Erik Dietzenbacher, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, and Gaaitzen J. de Vries. 2015. An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production. Review of International Economics 23(3):575–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Monetary Fund 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raphael A. Auer
    • 1
  • Barthélémy Bonadio
    • 2
  • Andrei A. Levchenko
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Bank for International Settlements and CEPRBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.University of Michigan NBER and CEPRAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations