Does Austerity Go Along with Internal Devaluations?

  • Luisa Lambertini
  • Christian ProebstingEmail author
Research Article


We empirically show that the austerity packages implemented in some euro area countries during 2010–2014 were only partially successful in generating internal devaluations. Countries that cut spending indeed experienced a decline in nominal wages, a real exchange rate depreciation, a fall in the relative price of non-tradables and a shift of consumption toward non-tradables, whereas we find no such evidence for countries raising consumption taxes. We show that this asymmetric response is in line with a small open economy model with GHH preferences. Moreover, the output costs of correcting current accounts were higher than anticipated because neither policy was successful in raising exports through lower prices. Instead, current account improvements were solely driven by lower imports stemming from faltering domestic demand. We provide evidence that exporters absorbed lower wages through higher markups, and show in a model with pricing to market that, had firms kept their markups constant, output costs of correcting current account imbalances would have been cut by almost one half.


E62 F41 F45 



Lambertini gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 100018_182257.

Supplementary material

41308_2019_86_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 2118 KB)


  1. Amiti, Mary, Oleg Itskhoki, and Jozef Konings. 2016. International shocks and domestic prices: How large are strategic complementarities? NBER Working Paper.Google Scholar
  2. Atkeson, Andrew, and Ariel Burstein. 2008. Pricing-to-market, trade costs, and international relative prices. American Economic Review 98(5): 1998–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auerbach, Alan J., and Yuriy Gorodnichenko. 2012. Fiscal multipliers in recession and expansion. In Fiscal policy after the financial crisis, ed. Alberto Alesina and Francesco Giavazzi, 63–98. University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
  4. Backus, David K., Patrick J. Kehoe, and Finn E. Kydland. 1994. Dynamics of the trade balance and the terms of trade: The J-curve? American Economic Review 84(1): 84–103.Google Scholar
  5. Beetsma, Roel, Massimo Giuliodori, and Franc Klaassen. 2008. The effects of public spending shocks on trade balances and budget deficits in the European Union. Journal of the European Economic Association 6(2–3): 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berka, Martin, Michael B. Devereux, and Charles Engel. 2018. Real exchange rates and sectoral productivity in the eurozone. American Economic Review 108(6): 1543–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernanke, Ben S., Mark Gertler, and Simon Gilchrist. 1999. The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In Handbook of macroeconomics, vol. 1, ed. John B. Taylor and Michael Woodford, 1341–1393. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchard, Oliver, and David Leigh. 2013. Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 103(3): 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchard, Olivier, and Roberto Perotti. 2002. An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4): 1329–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Born, Benjamin, Falko Juessen, and Gernot J. Müller. 2013. Exchange rate regimes and fiscal multipliers. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37(2): 446–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burstein, Ariel, and Gita Gopinath. 2014. International prices and exchange rates. In Handbook of International economics, Vol. 4, ed. Gita Gopinath, Elhanan Helpman, Kenneth Rogoff. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Canova, Fabio, and Evi Pappa. 2007. Price differentials in monetary unions: The role of fiscal shocks. Economic Journal 117(520): 713–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coenen, Günter, Roland Straub, and Mathias Trabandt. 2013. Gauging the effects of fiscal stimulus packages in the euro area. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37(2): 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Égert, Balázs. 2011. Catching-up and inflation in Europe: Balassa–Samuelson, Engel’s Law and other culprits. Economic Systems 35(2): 208–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eichengreen, Barry. 2012. Implications of the Euros crisis for international monetary reform. Journal of Policy Modeling 34(4): 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission. 2010. The economic adjustment programme for Greece, 2010. Occasional Papers 61.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. 2011. The economic adjustment programme for Portugal, 2011. Occasional Papers 79.Google Scholar
  18. Eurostat and European Commission. 2014. Taxation trends in the European Union—Data for the EU member states, Iceland and Norway. Technical Report.Google Scholar
  19. Farhi, Emmanuel, Gita Gopinath, and Oleg Itskhoki. 2013. Fiscal devaluations. Review of Economic Studies 81(2): 725–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galí, Jordi, and Tommaso Monacelli. 2005. Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy. Review of Economic Studies 72(3): 707–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldberg, Linda S, and José Manuel Campa. 2010. The sensitivity of the CPI to exchange rates: Distribution margins, imported inputs, and trade exposure. Review of Economics and Statistics 92(2): 392–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenwood, Jeremy, Zvi Hercowitz, and Gregory W. Huffman. 1988. Investment, capacity utilization, and the real business cycle. American Economic Review 78: 402–417.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, Robert E. 2009. By how much does GDP rise if the government buys more output?. Brookings papers on economic activity, Fall: 183–236.Google Scholar
  24. Heathcote, Jonathan, and Fabrizio Perri. 2002. Financial autarky and international real business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics 49(3): 601–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. House, Christopher L., Christian Proebsting, and Linda L. Tesar. 2019. Austerity in the aftermath of the Great Recession. Journal of Monetary Economics. Scholar
  26. Ilzetzki, Ethan, Enrique G. Mendoza, and Carlos A. Végh. 2013. How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics 60(2): 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kimball, Miles S. 1995. The quantitative analytics of the basic neomonetarist model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27(4): 1241–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klenow, Peter J., and Jonathan L. Willis. 2016. Real rigidities and nominal price changes. Economica 83(331): 443–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lambertini, Luisa, and Christian Proebsting. 2019. Fiscal policy, inflation and trade linkages. Working paper.Google Scholar
  30. Mendoza, Enrique G, Assaf Razin, and Linda L Tesar. 1994. Effective tax rates in macroeconomics: Cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 34(3): 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Monacelli, Tommaso, and Roberto Perotti. 2010. Fiscal policy, the real exchange rate and traded goods. The Economic Journal 120(544): 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakamura, Emi, and Jon Steinsson. 2014. Fiscal stimulus in a monetary union: Evidence from US regions. American Economic Review 104(3): 753–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perotti, Roberto. 2004. Estimating the effects of fiscal policy in OECD countries. Working paper.Google Scholar
  34. Ravn, Morten O., Stephanie Schmitt-Grohé, and Martin Uribe. 2007. Explaining the effects of government spending shocks on consumption and the real exchange rate. NBER working paper.Google Scholar
  35. Rogoff, Kenneth. 1996. The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 34(2): 647–668.Google Scholar
  36. Semmler, Willi. 2013. The macroeconomics of austerity in the European Union. Social Research 80(3): 883–914.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Monetary Fund 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations