Advertisement

Channels of Risk Sharing in the Eurozone: What Can Banking and Capital Market Union Achieve?

  • Mathias HoffmannEmail author
  • Egor Maslov
  • Bent E. Sørensen
  • Iryna Stewen
Research Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

We study channels of risk sharing in the EMU before and after 2008, when the Great Recession started. Empirically, higher cross-border equity holdings and more direct bank-to-nonbank lending are associated with more risk sharing while interbank integration is not. Equity market integration in the EMU remains limited while banking integration is dominated by interbank integration. Further, interbank integration proved to be highly procyclical, which contributed to a freeze in risk sharing after 2008. Based on this evidence, and results from simulations of a stylized DSGE model, we discuss implications for banking union. Our results show that direct banking integration and capital market integration are complements and that robust risk sharing in the EMU requires integration on both fronts.

JEL

E21 E32 E44 F30 F36 F40 F45 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We could like to thank the editors Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan, Philippe Martin, and Linda Tesar and our discussants Marcel Fratzscher and Rosen Valchev as well as two anonymous referees for many useful suggestions and comments. We are also grateful to conference and seminar participants in Dublin, at the Bank of Finland, the University of Zurich, and the ASSA meetings 2019 for comments.

References

  1. Artis, Michael J., and Mathias Hoffmann. 2011. The home bias, capital income flows and improved long-term consumption risk sharing between industrialized countries. International Finance 14(3): 481–505.Google Scholar
  2. Asdrubali, Pierfederico, Bent E. Sørensen, and Oved Yosha. 1996. Channels of interstate risk sharing: United States 1963–1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(4): 1081–1110.Google Scholar
  3. Backus, David K., and Gregor W. Smith. 1993. Consumption and real exchange rates in dynamic economies with non-traded goods. Journal of International Economics 35(3–4): 297–316.Google Scholar
  4. Backus, David K., Patrick J. Kehoe, and Finn E. Kydland. 1992. International real business cycles. Journal of Political Economy 100(4): 745–775.Google Scholar
  5. Baxter, Marianne, and Mario J. Crucini. 1995. Business cycles and the asset structure of foreign trade. International Economic Review 36(4): 821–854.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, Sascha O., and Mathias Hoffmann. 2006. Intra- and international risk-sharing in the short run and the long run. European Economic Review 50(3): 777–806.Google Scholar
  7. Blanchard, Olivier, and Jordi Galí. 2007. Real wage rigidities and the new Keynesian model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39: 35–65.Google Scholar
  8. Bruno, Valentina, and Hyun Song Shin. 2015. Cross-border banking and global liquidity. Review of Economic Studies 82(2): 535–564.Google Scholar
  9. Canova, Fabio, and Morten O. Ravn. 1996. International consumption risk sharing. International Economic Review 37(3): 573–601.Google Scholar
  10. Cochrane, John H. 1991. A simple test of consumption insurance. Journal of Political Economy 99(5): 957–76.Google Scholar
  11. Coeurdacier, Nicolas, Hélène Rey, and Pablo Winant. 2015. “Financial Integration and Growth in a Risky World,” CEPR Discussion Papers 11009, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
  12. Corsetti, Giancarlo, Luca Dedola, and Sylvain Leduc. 2008. International risk sharing and the transmission of productivity shocks. Review of Economic Studies 75(2): 443–473.Google Scholar
  13. Demyanyk, Yuliya, Charlotte Ostergaard, and Bent E. Sørensen. 2007. U.S. banking deregulation, small businesses, and interstate insurance of personal income. Journal of Finance LXII(6): 2763–2801.Google Scholar
  14. Gerali, Andrea, Stefano Neri, Luca Sessa, and Federico M. Signoretti. 2010. Credit and banking in a DSGE model of the Euro area. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 42: 107–141.Google Scholar
  15. Hale, Galina, and Maurice Obstfeld. 2014. “The euro and the geography of international debt flows,” Working Paper Series 2014-10, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.Google Scholar
  16. Heathcote, Jonathan, and Fabrizio Perri. 2004. Financial globalization and real regionalization. Journal of Economic Theory 119(1): 207–243.Google Scholar
  17. Heathcote, Jonathan, and Fabrizio Perri. 2013. The international diversification puzzle is not as bad as you think. Journal of Political Economy 121(6): 1108–1159.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffmann, Mathias, and Iryna Shcherbakova-Stewen. 2011. Consumption risk sharing over the business cycle: The role of small firms’ access to credit markets. The Review of Economics and Statistics 93(4): 1403–1416. 06.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmann, Mathias, Egor Maslov, and Bent E. Sørensen. 2017. “Small firms and domestic bank dependence in Europe’s great recession,” Technical Report, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  20. Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem, Bent E. Sørensen, and Oved Yosha. 2005. “Asymmetric shocks and risk sharing in a monetary union: Updated evidence and policy implications for Europe.”Google Scholar
  21. Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem, Elias Papaioannou, and Fabrizio Perri. 2013. Global banks and crisis transmission. Journal of International Economics 89(2): 495–510.Google Scholar
  22. Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem, Elias Papaioannou, and José-Luis Peydro. 2010. What lies beneath the Euro’s effect on financial integration? Currency risk, legal harmonization, or trade? Journal of International Economics 81(1): 75–88.Google Scholar
  23. Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem, Emiliano Luttini, and Bent E. Sørensen. 2014. Debt crises and risk-sharing: The role of markets versus sovereigns. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 116(1): 253–276.Google Scholar
  24. Kollmann, Robert. 1995. Consumption, real exchange rates and the structure of international asset markets. Journal of International Money and Finance 14(2): 191–211.Google Scholar
  25. Lane, Philip R. 2012. The European sovereign debt crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer 26(3): 49–68.Google Scholar
  26. Lane, Philip R, and Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti. 2007. The external wealth of nations mark II: Revised and extended estimates of foreign assets and liabilities, 1970–2004. Journal of International Economics 73(2): 223–250.Google Scholar
  27. Lewis, Karen K. 1996. What can explain the apparent lack of international consumption risk sharing? Journal of Political Economy 104(2): 267–297.Google Scholar
  28. Mace, Barbara. 1991. Full insurance in the presence of aggregate uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy 99(5): 928–56.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, Philippe, and Thomas Philippon. 2017. Inspecting the mechanism: Leverage and the great recession in the Eurozone. American Economic Review 107(7): 1904–1937.Google Scholar
  30. Morgan, Donald P., Bertrand Rime, and Philip E. Strahan. 2004. Bank integration and state business cycles. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(4): 1555–85.Google Scholar
  31. Neumeyer, Pablo A., and Fabrizio Perri. 2005. Business cycles in emerging economies: The role of interest rates. Journal of Monetary Economics 52(2): 345–380.Google Scholar
  32. Obstfeld, Maurice. 1993. “Are industrial-country consumption risks globally diversified?,” NBER Working Papers 4308, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Petersen, Mitchell A., and Raghuram G. Rajan. 1994. The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance 49(1): 3–37.Google Scholar
  34. Schmitt-Grohé, Stephanie, and Martín Uribe. 2003. Closing small open economy models. Journal of International Economics 61(1): 163–185.Google Scholar
  35. Sharpe, Steven A. 1990. Asymmetric information, bank lending and implicit contracts: A stylized model of customer relationships. The Journal of Finance 45(4): 1069–1087.Google Scholar
  36. Sørensen, Bent E., and Oved Yosha. 1998. International risk sharing and European monetary unification. Journal of International Economics 45(2): 211–238.Google Scholar
  37. Sørensen, Bent E., Yi-Tsu Wu, Oved Yosha, and Yu Zhu. 2007. Home bias and international risk sharing: Twin puzzles separated at birth. Journal of International Money and Finance 26: 587–605.Google Scholar
  38. Townsend, Robert M. 1994. Risk and insurance in village India. Econometrica 62: 539–91.Google Scholar
  39. Whelan, Karl. 2014. TARGET2 and central bank balance sheets. Economic Policy 29(77): 79–137.Google Scholar
  40. Whelan, Karl. 2017. “Should we be concerned about TARGET balances?,” Technical Report, European Parliament.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Monetary Fund 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathias Hoffmann
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Egor Maslov
    • 2
    • 5
    • 6
  • Bent E. Sørensen
    • 7
    • 8
  • Iryna Stewen
    • 2
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of Economics, International Trade and Finance GroupUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of Zurich’s Research Priority Program in Financial Market Regulation (URPP FinReg)ZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.The CESifo MunichMunichGermany
  4. 4.The Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis (CAMA)The Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  5. 5.Department of Banking and FinanceThe University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  6. 6.The Swiss Finance Institute (SFI)ZurichSwitzerland
  7. 7.The Department of EconomicsUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  8. 8.The Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)LondonUK
  9. 9.Gutenberg School of Management and EconomicsJohannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations