Balancing the Moods: Quality Managers’ Perceptions and Actions Against Resistance
- 95 Downloads
Quality management (QM) in teaching and learning is a result but also a cause of organizational change in higher education institutions. Hence, quality managers are confronted with different responses from academia (e.g., resistance) to institutional processes caused by QM in teaching and learning. The following article investigates how and with which actions quality managers respond to academics’ resistance. For this purpose, we use a theoretical framework suggested by Oliver (Acad Manag Rev 16(1):145–179, 1991), who distinguishes between different strategies and tactics. Our research focuses particularly on the strategy of compromising, which seems to be dominant and constitutive for quality managers as members of an emerging higher education profession. Our empirical results show that quality managers take different actions that are related to tactics like balancing, pacifying and bargaining.
Keywordshigher education quality management institutional processes resistance balancing
We are grateful to Isabell Steinhardt and Christian Schneijderberg for their comments on an earlier version of this article. Furthermore, we want to thank our two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
This work originates from the research project WiQu—impact research on quality assurance of teaching and learning—procedural, structural and personnel causes of quality assurance departments’ impact. It was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung) [Grant Number 49 01PY13003A/B].
- Kelle, U. (2006) ‘Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(4): 293–311.Google Scholar
- Mendel, P. (2006) ‘The making and expansion of international management standards: The global diffusion of ISO 9000 quality management certificates’, in G.S. Drori, J.W. Meyer and H. Hwang (eds.) Globalization and Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–166.Google Scholar
- Saldana, J. (2009) An Introduction to Codes and Coding, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Schneijderberg, C. (2017a) ‘Bureaucratization process in higher education’, in J.C. Shin and P.N. Teixeira (eds.) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
- Schneijderberg, C. (2017b) ‘Higher education professionals: a growing profession’, in, J.C. Shin and P.N. Teixeira (eds.) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
- Seyfried, M. and Ansmann, M. (2017) ‘Unfreezing higher education institutions? Understanding the introduction of quality management in teaching and learning in Germany’, Higher Education 75(8): 1–16.Google Scholar
- Stensaker, B. (2007) ‘Quality as fashion: exploring the translation of a management idea into higher education’, in D.F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker and M.J. Rose (eds.) Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (2003) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wolter, A. (2004) ‘From state control to competition: German higher education transformed’, Canadian Journal of Higher Education 34(3): 73–104.Google Scholar