Sustainability Governance at Universities: Using a Governance Equalizer as a Research Heuristic
- 393 Downloads
Universities play a crucial role in promoting sustainable development. Accordingly, the project “Sustainability at Higher Education Institutions: develop — network — report (HOCHN)” (2016–2018) aims to facilitate sustainable development at universities in Germany. One of the project’s research focuses is sustainability governance. It investigates the variety of different protagonists and structures that are involved in the processes of developing and managing sustainability. To this end, a heuristic technique referred to as the “governance equalizer” is applied. It covers five dimensions that have been adapted for this research: politics, profession, organisation, knowledge and visibility. This paper introduces the concept of the governance equalizer and locates it in the context of sustainability in higher education institutions. Against this backdrop, it presents and discusses findings from preparatory expert interviews on sustainability governance, with the aim of validating the governance equalizer and identifying focal points for subsequent stakeholder interviews in German universities.
Keywordssustainable universities sustainability governance governance heuristics interviews literature research
The authors would like to thank the editors and reviewers for their constructive comments, feedback and recommendations relating to an earlier draft of the article. Furthermore, the authors would like to acknowledge the active participation of all the partners in the HOCHN project.
The HOCHN project is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) from 11/2016 to 10/2018 under No. FKZ13NKE007A and is linked to existing results from the BMBF-framework FONA (research for sustainable development) and the BMBF-initiative “sustainability in science” (SISI).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
- Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) (ed.) (2016) Sustainable Campus Index. 2016 Top Performers & Highlights, Philadelphia, USA, http://www.aashe.org/files/sci-2016-final.pdf, accessed 12 April 2017.
- Braun, D. and Merrien, F.-X. (1999) ‘Governance of universities and modernisation of the state: Analytical aspects’, in D. Braun and F.-X. Merrien (eds.) Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities? A Comparative View, London: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 9–33.Google Scholar
- de Boer, H., Enders, J. and Schimank, U. (2007) ‘On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany’, in D. Jansen (ed.) New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations — Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration, Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V., pp. 137–152.Google Scholar
- Enders, J. (2002) Governing the Academic Commons: About Blurring Boundaries, Blistering Organisations, and Growing Demands, Enschede, The CHEPS inaugural lectures 2002.Google Scholar
- Ferrer-Balas, D., Buckland, H. and de Mingo, M. (2009) ‘Explorations on the University’s role in society for sustainable development through a systems transition approach. Case-study of the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC)’, Journal of Cleaner Production 17(12): 1075–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gerhards, J. and Neidhardt, F. (1990) Strukturen und Funktionen moderner Öffentlichkeit. Fragestellungen und Ansätze, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Leal Filho, W. (ed.) (2012) Sustainable Development at Universities, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Leal Filho, W., Pallant, E., Enete, A., Richter, B. and Brandli, L.L. (2018) ‘Planning and implementing sustainability in higher education institutions: an overview of the difficulties and potentials’, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology. Published online 10 April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1461707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luhmann, N. (2000) Die Politik der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Martens, W. and Ortmann, G. (2006) ‘Organisationen in Luhmanns Systemtheorie‘, in A. Kieser and M. Ebers (eds.) Organisationstheorien, 6th Edition, Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, pp. 427–461.Google Scholar
- Michelsen, G. (2016) ‘Policy, politics and polity in higher education for sustainable development’, in M. Barth, G. Michelsen, I. Thomas and M. Rieckmann (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Higher Education for Sustainable Development, London: Routledge, pp. 40–55.Google Scholar
- Parto, S. (2005) “Good” Governance and Policy Analysis: What of Institutions? Maastricht: MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology. MERIT Research Memoranda No. 001.Google Scholar
- Rammel, C., Velásquez, L. and Mader, C. (2016) ‘sustainability assessment in higher education institutions. What and how?‘, in M. Barth, G. Michelsen, I. Thomas and M. Rieckmann (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Higher Education for Sustainable Development, London: Routledge, pp. 331–346.Google Scholar
- Saretzki, T. (2007) ‘Argumentieren, Verhandeln und Strategie. Theoretische Referenzen, begriffliche Unterscheidungen und empirische Studien zu arguing und bargaining in der internationalen Politik’, in P. Niesen and B. Herborth (eds.) Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. pp. 111–146.Google Scholar
- Schimank, U., Kehm, B. and Enders, J. (1999) ‘Institutional mechanisms of problem processing of the German university system: Status quo and new developments’, in D. Braun and F.-X. Merrien (eds.) Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities? A Comparative View, London: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 179–194.Google Scholar
- Scott, G., Tilbury, D., Sharp, L. and Deane, E. (2012) Turnaround Leadership for Sustainability in Higher Education. Executive Summary, Sydney: University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
- Shiel, C. and Williams, A. (2015) ‘Working together, driven apart: reflecting on a joint endeavour to address sustainable development within a university’, in W. Leal Filho, L. Brandli, O. Kuznetsova, and A.M. Finisterra do Paço (eds.) Integrative Approaches to Sustainable Development at University Level, Cham: Springer International Publishing (World Sustainability Series), pp. 425–447.Google Scholar
- Shriberg, M.P. (2002) ‘Sustainability in U.S. higher education: organizational factors influencing campus environmental performance and leadership’, PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Spira, F., Tappeser, V. and Meyer, A. (2013) ‘Perspectives on sustainability governance from universities in the USA, UK, and Germany: how do change agents employ different tools to alter organizational cultures and structures?’ in S. Caeiro, W. Leal Filho, C. Jabbour, and U. M. Azeiteiro (eds.) Sustainability Assessment Tools in Higher Education Institutions. Mapping Trends and Good Practices around the World, Cham: Springer, pp. 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Straßheim, H. (2009) ‘Governance als reflexive Koordination’, in S. Botzem, J. Hofmann, S. Quack, G.F. Schuppert and H. Straßheim (eds.) Governance als Prozess. Koordinationsformen im Wandel, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 461–477.Google Scholar
- Wals, A.E.J., Tassone, V.C., Hampson, G.P. and Reams, J. (2016) ‘Learning for walking the change: eco-social innovation through sustainability-oriented higher education’, in M. Barth, G. Michelsen, I. Thomas, and M. Rieckmann (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Higher Education for Sustainable Development, London: Routledge, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar