Academic Freedom and World-Class Universities: A Virtuous Circle?

  • Terence Karran
  • Lucy Mallinson
Original Article


Using empirical data from over 1500 respondents (drawn from across the UK) to a survey on academic freedom, and the Times Higher’s World University Rankings, this paper is a comparative assessment of the relationship between professed levels of de facto protection for academic freedom by teaching and research staff in individual UK universities, and their institution’s excellence, as evinced by world university rankings. The study reveals that normative protection for academic freedom is strongest in Russell Group universities and weakest in post-1992 institutions. Additionally, the professed level of protection for academic freedom reported by respondents to the survey is shown to have a positive relationship with the World Rankings’ positions of their institutions. Furthermore, the study considers whether academic freedom may be a prerequisite for, or defining characteristic of, a world-class university. Finally, the paper assesses the possible policy implications of this research for universities and their leaders, and higher educational policy makers, within the UK and beyond, seeking to improve the Times Higher’s World Ranking positions of their institutions.


academic freedom world class university rankings 


  1. Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I. and Elander, C. (2009) ‘Brave New World: Higher Education Reform in Finland’, Higher Education Management and Policy 21(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Åkerlind, G. and Kayrooz, C. (2003) ‘Understanding academic freedom: the views of social scientists’, Higher Research and Development 22(3): 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altbach, P. (1999) ‘The logic of mass higher education’, Tertiary Education and Management 5(2): 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altbach, P. (2001) ‘Academic freedom: International realities and challenges’,  Higher Education 41(1/2): 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altbach, P. (2011) ‘The Past, Present, and Future of the Research University’, in P. Altbach and J. Salmi (eds) The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of World-Class Research Universities, Washington: The World Bank, pp. 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amsler, S. and Bolsmann, C. (2012) ‘University ranking as social exclusion’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 33(2): 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, R. (1988) ‘Limits to Academic Freedom: Imposed-Upon or Self-Imposed?’, in M. Tight (ed.) Academic Freedom and Responsibility, Buckingham: SRHE/OU Press, pp. 88–103.Google Scholar
  8. Barron, G. (2017) ‘The Berlin Principles on Ranking Higher Education Institutions: Limitations, legitimacy, and value conflict’, Higher Education 73(2): 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baty, P. (2014) ‘The Times Higher Education World University Rankings, 2004–2012’, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 13(1): 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birnbaum, R. (2000) ‘The Life Cycle of Academic Management Fads’, The Journal of Higher Education 71(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowden, R. (2000) ‘Fantasy Higher Education: University and college league tables’, Quality in Higher Education 6(1): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brewster, K. (1972) ‘On Tenure’, Academe 58(4): 381–383.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, R. (2001) ‘The governance of the new universities: Do we need to think again?’ Perspectives 5(1): 42–47.Google Scholar
  14. Cowles, M., and Davis, C. (1982) ‘On the origins of the .05 level of statistical significance’, American Psychologist 37(5): 553–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Department for Business, Innovations and Skills (2015) Fulfilling our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice (Cm 9141), London: Department of Business, Innovations and Skills: Open Government License (OGL).Google Scholar
  16. Frankham, J. (2017) ‘Employability and higher education: the follies of the “Productivity Challenge” in the Teaching Excellence Framework’, Journal of Education Policy 32(5): 628–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gall, M., Gall, J. and Borg, W. (2007) Educational research: An introduction, Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  18. Harvey, L. (2008) ‘Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Review’, Quality in Higher Education 14(3): 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harwell, M., Rubinstein, E., Hayes, W., and Olds, C. (1992) ‘Summarising Monte Carlo results in methodological research: the One and Two factor fixed effects ANOVA cases’, Journal of Education Statistics 17(4): 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. House of Commons Education and Skills Committee (2005) UK e-University: Third Report of Session 200405 (HC489), London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  21. Karran, T. (2009) ‘Academic Freedom in Europe: Time for a Magna Charta?’, Higher Education Policy 22(2): 163–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Latif, M. (2014) ‘Academic freedom: problems in conceptualization and research’, Higher Education Research and Development 33(2): 399–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leeds Beckett University (undated) accessed from: [accessed 20th July 2017]
  24. Manan, W. (2000) ‘Academic freedom: Ethical implications and civic responsibilities’, in G. Neave (ed.) The universities’ responsibilities to society: International perspectives, Kidlington: Elsevier Science, pp. 253–270.Google Scholar
  25. Marginson, S. (2007) ‘Rankings: Marketing Mana or Menace? The Big Picture’. Paper presented at the 16th Annual New Zealand International Education Conference; 8–10 August, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  26. Moed, H. (2017) ‘A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings’, Scientometrics 110(2): 967–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murphy, T., and Sage, D. (2015) ‘Perceptions of the UK’s Research Excellence Framework 2014’, Australian Universities Review 57(2): 31–36.Google Scholar
  28. Nolan, M., Ingleton, C., and Hayter, M. (2008) ‘The Research Excellence Framework (REF): A major impediment to free and informed debate?’, International Journal of Nursing Studies 45: 487–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Onchiri, S. (2013) ‘Conceptual Model on Application of Chi Square Test on Education and Social Sciences’, Educational Research and Reviews 8(15): 1231–1241.Google Scholar
  30. Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A. (2013) ‘Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science?’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A.,176(3): 609–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pusser, B., Marginson, S. (2013) ‘University Rankings in Critical Perspective’, The Journal of Higher Education 84(4): 544-568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rabban, D. (2001) “Academic Freedom, Individual or Institutional?”, Academe 87(6): 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rauhvargers, A. (2013) Global University Rankings And Their ImpactReport II, Brussels: EUA.Google Scholar
  34. Rosovsky, H. (2014) ‘Researh universities: American Exceptionalism?’, Carnegie Reporter: Special Issue 7(3): 57–61.Google Scholar
  35. Salkind, N. (2004) ‘Two groups too many? Try analysis of variance’, in L. Shaw, M. Crouppen, D. Axelsen, and L. Lech (eds.) Statistics for people who think they hate statistics, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., pp. 193–211.Google Scholar
  36. Salmi, J., and Saroyan, A. (2007) ‘League Tables as Policy Instruments: Uses and Misuses’, Higher Education Management and Policy 19(2): 31–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shattock, M. (1999) ‘Governance and management in universities: The way we live now’, Journal of Education Policy 14(3): 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shattock, M. (2002) ‘Re-balancing modern concepts of university governance’, Higher Education Quarterly 56(3): 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shin, J., and Toutkoushian, R. (2011) ‘The Past, Present, and Future of University Rankings’, in J. Shin, R. Toutkoushian and U. Teichler (eds.) University Rankings: Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, S., Ward, V. and House, A. (2011) ‘“Impact” in the proposals for the UK’s Research Excellence Framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy’, Research Policy 40(10): 1369–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soh, K. (2015) ‘Multicolinearity and Indicator Redundancy Problem in World University Rankings: An Example Using Times Higher Education World University Ranking 2013–2014 Data’, Higher Education Quarterly 69(2):158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. University of Durham (Undated) accessed from: [Accessed: 20th July 2017]
  43. University of Harvard (1970) University-Wide Statement on Rights and Responsibilities, accessed from: [Accessed 20th July 2017]
  44. University of Oxford (2013) Strategic Plan 2013 to 2018, accessed from [Accessed 20th July 2017]
  45. Watermeyer, R. (2016) ‘Impact in the REF: issues and obstacles’, Studies in Higher Education 41(2): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wood, M. and Su, F. (2017) ‘What makes an excellent lecturer? Academics’ perspectives on the discourse of “teaching excellence” in higher education’, Teaching In Higher Education 22(4): 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolff, K. (2000) “Academic Freedom and University Autonomy”, in G. Neave (ed.) The Universities’ Responsibilities to Society: International Perspectives, Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 196–205.Google Scholar
  48. Wright, S. (2014) ‘Knowledge that counts: points systems and the governance of Danish universities’, in D. Smith and A. Griffith (eds.) Under New Public Management: Institutional Ethnographies Of Changing Front-Line Work, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 294–338.Google Scholar
  49. Zhang, H., Patton, D., Kenney, M. (2013) ‘Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project’, Research Policy 42: 765–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of LincolnLincolnUK
  2. 2.Higher Education Research InstituteUniversity of LincolnLincolnUK

Personalised recommendations