Higher Education Policy

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 141–160 | Cite as

Success and Impact in Widening Participation Policy: What Works and How Do We Know?

Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Efforts to widen the participation in higher education for disadvantaged and under-represented groups are common to many countries. In England, higher education institutions are required by government to invest in ‘outreach’ activities designed to encourage such groups. There is increasing policy and research interest around the effectiveness of these activities and how this might be evaluated. This paper reports the results of a project designed to explore concepts of ‘success’ and ‘impact’ with two generations of practitioner-managers working in this field, including extended telephone interviews with ten active in the mid-2000s, and online questionnaires from 57 engaged in the mid-2010s. The paper concludes that the drive to ‘measure the measurable’ may be undermining successful activities, while unhelpful inter-institution competition has replaced the co-operative ethos and wider social justice aims that dominated ten years ago.

Keywords

participation access England partnerships aspirations attainment targeting 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the kind support of the Society for Research into Higher Education who funded the AIMS project through their annual research awards programme (December 2013).

References

  1. Boliver, V. (2013) ‘How fair is access to more prestigious UK universities?’, British Journal of Sociology 64(2): 344–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chowdry, H., Crawford, C., Dearden, L., Goodman, A. and Vignoles, A. (2013) ‘Widening participation in higher education: analysis using linked administrative data’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176(2): 431–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman, R. and Bekhradnia, B. (2011) Higher Education Supply and Demand to 2020, Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Crawford, C. (2014) The Link Between Secondary School Characteristics and University Participation and Outcomes, London: DFE.Google Scholar
  5. Croxford, L. and Raffe, D. (2015) ‘The iron law of hierarchy? Institutional differentiation in UK higher education’, Studies in Higher Education 40(9): 1625–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills [BIS]. (2014) National strategy for access and student success in higher education, London: BIS.Google Scholar
  7. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills [BIS]. (2015) Widening participation in higher education: July 2015, London: BIS.Google Scholar
  8. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills [BIS]. (2016) Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice, London: BIS.Google Scholar
  9. Department for Education [DFE]. (2016) Widening Participation in Higher Education: 2016, London: DFE.Google Scholar
  10. Department for Education and Employment [DFEE]. (2000) The Excellence Challenge, London: DFEE.Google Scholar
  11. Department for Education and Skills [DfES]. (2003a) The Future of Higher Education, Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
  12. Department for Education and Skills [DfES]. (2003b) Widening Participation in Higher Education, London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  13. Doyle, M. and Griffin, M. (2012) ‘Raised Aspirations and Attainment? A Review of the Impact of Aimhigher (2004–2011) on Widening Participation in Higher Education in England’, London Review of Education 10(1): 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorard, S., Adnett, N., May, H., Slack, K., Smith, E. and Thomas, L. (2006) Overcoming the Barriers to Higher Education, Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.Google Scholar
  15. Gorard, S. and See, B.H. (2013) Overcoming Disadvantage in Education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Harrison, N. (2011) ‘Have the changes introduced by the 2004 Higher Education Act made higher education admissions in England wider and fairer?’, Journal of Education Policy 26(3): 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison, N. (2012) ‘The mismeasure of participation: how choosing the ‘wrong’ statistic helped seal the fate of Aimhigher’, Higher Education Review 45(1): 30–61.Google Scholar
  18. Harrison, N. (Forthcoming) ‘Exploring social trends in higher education participation: 2000–2015’, in R. Waller, N. Ingram and M. Ward (eds.) Higher Education and Social Inequalities: Getting in, Getting on and Getting out, Abingdon: Routledge/BSAGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrison, N. and McCaig, C. (2015) ‘An ecological fallacy in higher education policy: the use, overuse and misuse of “low participation neighbourhoods”’, Journal of Further and Higher Education 39(6): 793–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrison, N. and Waller, R. (2015) The Evaluation of Widening Participation Activities in Higher Education: A Survey of Institutional Leaders in England, Bristol: UWE.Google Scholar
  21. Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE]. (2004) Aimhigher: Guidance Notes for Integration, Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  22. Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE]. (2005) Young Participation in Higher Education (Report 2005/03), Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  23. Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE]. (2007) Higher Education Outreach: Targeting Disadvantaged Learners (Report 2007/12), Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  24. Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE]. (2010) Trends in Young Participation in Higher Education: Core Results for England (Report 2010/03), Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  25. Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE]. (2012) POLAR3: Young Participation in Higher Education (Report 2012/26), Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  26. Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE]. (2014) Guidance for National Networks for Collaborative Outreach, Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  27. Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE]. (2016) National Collaborative Outreach Programme: Invitation to Submit Proposals for Funding, Bristol: HEFCE.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, S. (2012) The Personal Statement: A Fair Way to Assess University Applicants?, London: Sutton Trust.Google Scholar
  29. Mangan, J., Hughes, A., Davies, P. and Slack, K. (2010) ‘Fair access, achievement and geography: explaining the association between social class and choice of university’, Studies in Higher Education 15(3): 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCaig, C. (2015) ‘Marketisation and widening participation in English higher education: a critical discourse analysis of institutional access policy documents’, Higher Education Review 48(1): 6–24.Google Scholar
  31. Milburn, A. (2012) University Challenge: How Higher Education can Advance Social Mobility, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  32. Moore, J. and Dunworth, F. (2011) Review of Evidence from Aimhigher Area Partnerships of the Impact of Aimhigher, Bristol: Aimhigher/HEFCE.Google Scholar
  33. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education [NCIHE]. (1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society (known as the Dearing Report), Norwich: HMSOGoogle Scholar
  34. Office for Fair Access [OFFA]. (2015) Outcomes of Access Agreement Monitoring for 2013–14, Bristol: OFFAGoogle Scholar
  35. Passy, R. and Morris, M. (2010) Evaluation of Aimhigher: Learner Attainment and Progression, Slough: NfER.Google Scholar
  36. Reay, D., Crozier, G. and Clayton, J. (2009) ‘“Strangers in paradise”? Working-class students in elite universities’, Sociology 43(6): 1103–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomas, L. (2001) ‘Power, assumptions and prescriptions: a critique of widening participation policy-making’, Higher Education Policy 14(4): 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Universities and Colleges Admissions Service [UCAS]. (2015) End of Cycle Report 2015, Cheltenham: UCAS.Google Scholar
  39. Waller, R., Harrison, N. and Last, K. (2015a) Building a Culture of Participation: Interviews with the Former Directors of the National Aimhigher Programme, Bristol: UWE.Google Scholar
  40. Waller, R., Holford, J., Jarvis, P., Milana, M. and Webb, S. (2015b) ‘Neo-liberalism and the shifting discourse of “educational fairness”’, International Journal of Lifelong Education 34(6): 619–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitty, G., Hayton, A. and Tang, S. (2015) ‘Who you know, what you know and knowing the ropes: a review of evidence about access to higher education institutions in England’, Review of Education 3(1): 27–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations