Shaping Perceptions of a Policy Instrument: The Political–Administrative Formation of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education in Norway and England
- 285 Downloads
One of the most significant European higher education reform initiatives of the last decade is the introduction of a European Qualification Framework (EQF) emphasizing Learning Outcomes (LOs) in higher education. The EQF is offered as a reform to contribute to increased transparency and mobility, and also implies a certain degree of standardization and comparability as to how these initiatives are implemented in European countries. The current article considers these changes in light of institutional perspectives that highlight how common HE reforms, in practice, often vary considerably. It investigates how factors of national policy-making contexts, reform traditions and broader reform agendas contribute to variations in contemporary interpretations and applications of LOs, here in the cases of Norwegian and English HE. It argues that (1) the characteristics of English and Norwegian higher education provided contexts where the perceptions of LOs evolved in very different ways, (2) the different political–administrative structures in the two countries were linked to different governance logics at the national level and institutional levels, and (3) despite these variations, some common mechanisms driving reform can be identified, in the role of intermediary and quality assurance bodies.
Keywordslearning outcomes higher education policy instrument political–administrative regimes and traditions
- Adam, S. (2004) ‘Using learning outcomes: a consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing “learning outcomes” at the local, national and international levels. Presented at the United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland’. Retrieved from http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Seminars/040620LEARNING_OUTCOMES-Adams.pdf.
- Adam, S. (2008) ‘Learning outcomes current development s in Europe: update on the issues and applications of learning outcomes associated with the Bologna process’. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Seminars/Edinburgh_Feb08_Adams.pdf.
- Adelman, C. (2009) ‘The Bologna Process for U.S. Eyes: Re-learning Higher Education in the Age of Convergence, Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy’. www.ihep.org/Research/GlobalPerformance.cfm.
- Bagchus, R. (1998) ‘The trade-off between appropriateness and fit of policy’, in P.B. Guy and F. Van Nispen (eds.) Public Policy Instruments. Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration, Edward Elgar: Cheltenhan, pp. 46–66.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. and Tang, C. (2011) ‘Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does’, Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Bjørnåvold, J. and Coles, M. (2008) ‘Governing education and training; the case of qualifications frameworks’, European journal of vocational training, 42/43(1): 203–235.Google Scholar
- Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Lepori, B. and Musselin, C. (2011) ‘New Public Management, Network Governance and the university as a changing professional organization’, in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds.) Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp.161–176.Google Scholar
- Bleiklie, I. and Frølich, N. (2014) ‘Styring, organisering og ledelse i høyere utdanningspolitikk’, in N. Frølich, E. Hovdhaugen, and L. Terum, L. (eds.) Kvalitet, kapasitet og relevans. Utviklingstrekk i norsk høyere utdanning. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk, pp. 40–57.Google Scholar
- Brunsson, N., and Olsen, J.P. (1993) The reforming organization, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
- Chou, M-H. and Gornitzka, Å. (eds.) (2014) ‘Building the Knowledge Economy in Europe’, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2011) ‘Beyond NPM? Some Development Features’, T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds.) New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 391–404.Google Scholar
- de Bruin, H.A. and Hufen, H.A.M. (1998) ‘The Tradition Approach to Policy Instruments’, in B. Guy Peters and F.K.M. van Nispen (eds.) Public Policy Instruments. Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
- European Union (2011) Using learning outcomes, European Qualifications Framework Series: Note 4. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelonglearning-policy/doc/eqf/note4_en.pdf.
- Foss Hansen, H (2011) ‘NPM in Scandinavia’, in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds.) New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 113–129.Google Scholar
- Frølich, N. and Stensaker, B. (2012) ‘University Strategizing: The Role of Evaluation as a Sensemaking Tool’, in B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa and C.S. Sarrico (eds.) Managing Reform in Universities. The Dynamics of Culture, Identity and Organizational Change, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
- Frølich N, Hovdhaugen E. and Terum, L. (2014) Kvalitet, kapasitet og relevans. Utviklingstrekk i norsk høyere utdanning, Oslo: Cappelen Damm AkademiskGoogle Scholar
- Gellert, C. (1993) ‘Structures and Functional Differentiation-Remarks on Changing paradigms of Tertiary Education in Europe’ in C. Gellert (ed.). Higher Education in Europe. Jessica Kingsley: London, pp. 234–246.Google Scholar
- Gornitzka, Å., and Olsen, J.P. (2006) ‘Europeiske endringsprosesser og høyere utdanningsinstitusjoner’, Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 2: 259–274.Google Scholar
- Hovdhaugen, E. (2012) Leaving early: Individual, institutional and system perspectives on why Norwegian students leave their higher education institution before degree completion. PhD-dissertation, Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar
- Kickert, W.J. (2011) ‘Public Management Reform in Continental Europe: National Distinctiveness’. T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds.). New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 97–112.Google Scholar
- Kogan, M., Bauer, M., Bleiklie, I. and Henkel, M. (eds.) (2006) Transforming Higher Education: A Comparative Study, (2nd ed.) Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kvilhaugsvik, H. (2015) ‘Pedagogikk, politikk og styring. ‘Eit komparativt casestudium av læringsutbytte i norsk høgare utdanning. Master thesis Department of administration and organization theory, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
- Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
- NOKUT (2015) Kartlegging av læringsutbyttebeskrivelser. Evaluering av læringsutbytte-beskrivelser i statsvitenskap, Oslo: NOKUT.Google Scholar
- Nusche, D. (2008) ‘Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: a comparative review of selected practices’, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 15, Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/244257272573
- Peters, B.G. and van Nispen, F.K.M. (1998) Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Pliska, A.M. and McQuaide, J. (1994) ‘Pennsylvania’s battle for student learning outcomes’, Educational Leadership 51(1): 66–69.Google Scholar
- Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis, (2nd edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Proli, D. and Dondi, C. (2011) Analysis of learning outcomes approach implementation in European higher education, Retrieved from http://empleo.ugr.es/unilo/documentos/UNILO_ANALYSIS_OF_LOs_IMPLEMENTATION_with_annex.pdf.
- QAA (2012) UK quality code for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Assuring StandardsAnd Quality/quality-code/Pages/default.aspx
- Stensaker, B. and Sweetman, R. (2014) ‘Impact of Assessment Initiatives on Quality Assurance’, in Coates, H. (ed.) Higher education learning outcomes assessment. International perspectives, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 237–259.Google Scholar
- Thelen, K. (2014) Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity, Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Vedung, E. (1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation, Transaction Publishers: London.Google Scholar
- Wolf, A. (2003) Does education matter? Myths about education and economic growth, New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar