feminist disability studies as methodology: life-writing and the abled/disabled binary
What does feminist disability studies contribute to feminist methods? Feminist disability scholars interweave life-writing about their experiences of disability or caring for a disabled person to challenge ableist stereotypes. As such, they foreground their own vulnerability to build disability identity and community. This style of life-writing, while essential, tends to calcify the dichotomy between the disabled and abled—a binary that the field of feminist disability studies aims to destabilise. Building on new work in feminist disability studies, I show how some scholars use life-writing to cultivate an estranging sensitivity. This new sensitivity builds on prior feminist disability studies scholarship to estrange us from 1) the idea that disability is a cohesive identity and community, 2) that disability is always a socially desirable position, and 3) that allegiance to disability rights insulates us from ableist anxiety. By embracing the tension between solidifying and destabilising the meaning of disability, feminist disability scholars can leverage life-writing as a tool of resistance and thereby lessen the threat of conformity that life narratives tend to produce.
keywordsfeminist disability studies methodology autoethnography life-writing
- Ackerly, B., 2001. Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Aiden H. and McCarthy A., 2014. Current Attitudes Towards Disabled People. London: Scope.Google Scholar
- Anderson, L. and Glass-Coffin, B., 2013. I learn by going: autoethnographic modes of inquiry. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams and C. Ellis, eds. Handbook of Autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, pp. 57–83.Google Scholar
- Crow, L., 1996. Including all of our lives: renewing the social model of disability. In C. Barnes and G. Mercer, eds. Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability. Leeds: The Disability Press, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
- Davis, L., 2002. Bending Over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism, and Other Difficult Positions. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Douglas, K. and Carless, D., 2013. A history of autoethnographic inquiry. In S. Holman Jones, T.E. Adams and C. Ellis, eds. Handbook of Autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, pp. 84–122.Google Scholar
- Ellis, C. and Bochner, A.P., 2000. Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: researcher as subject. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, eds. The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 733–768.Google Scholar
- Holman Jones, S., Adams, T.E. and Ellis, C., 2013. Introduction: coming to know autoethnography as more than a method. In S. Holman Jones, T.E. Adams and C. Ellis, eds. Handbook of Autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, pp. 17–47.Google Scholar
- Kafer, A., 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Linton, S., 2007. Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- McRuer, R., 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Mintz, S., 2007. Unruly Bodies: Life Writing by Women with Disabilities. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, D.T. and Snyder, S., 2006. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Murderball, 2005. Film. Directed by Dana Adam Shapiro and Henry-Alex Rubin. USA: ThinkFilm.Google Scholar
- Murphy, R.F., 1987. The Body Silent: The Different World of the Disabled. New York: Henry Holt and Company, Inc..Google Scholar
- O’Toole, C.J., 2013. Disclosing our relationships to disabilities: an invitation for disability studies scholars. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(2). Available at: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3708/3226 [last accessed 21 May 2015].
- Pring, J., 2015. Backlash from activists over Scope’s attempt to ‘End the Awkward’. Disability News Service, August 7. Available at: http://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/backlash-from-activists-over-scopes-attempt-to-end-the-awkward/ [last accessed 1 February 2016].
- Scope, 2014. New research: majority of Brits uncomfortable talking to disabled people. Press release. Scope, 8 May. Available at: http://www.scope.org.uk/About-Us/Media/Press-releases/May-2014/New-research-Majority-of-Brits-uncomfortable-talki [last accessed 21 May 2015].
- Scully, J.L., 2008. Disability Bioethics: Moral Bodies, Moral Difference. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..Google Scholar
- Shakespeare, T., 2006. The social model of disability. In L.J. Davis, ed. The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 214–221.Google Scholar
- Thomson, R.G., 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Vanhala, L., 2011. Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wendell, S., 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Zola, I.K., 1982. Missing Pieces: A Chronicle of Living with a Disability. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar