Advertisement

EU political discourse on the energy security relations with Russia

  • Lukáš TichýEmail author
Research
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

The article explores the energy security relations of the European Union with the Russian Federation through the prism of the political discourse. It identifies key formations and topics related to the concept of security. Drawing on a detailed discourse analysis of 339 statements, interviews, speeches, press releases, and documents produced by EU political leaders and institutions, the article focuses on (a) the basic themes of EU political discourse on the energy security relations with Russia and (b) the perception of Russia by the European Union. The majority of the documents used in the article come from 2010 to 2019, the period of the second Barroso Commission and the Juncker Commission. At the theoretical level, the article is focused on the relationship between the main concept, political discourse, and security.

Keywords

European Union Russian Federation Political discourse Energy security Thematic analysis 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [Grant number: 18-00902S] under the title “The Internal and External Dimension of the EU Actorness in the Energy Relations with Russia and Alternative Suppliers.”

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Aalto, P. 2008. The EU–Russia Energy Dialogue and the Future of European Integration: From Economic to Politico-Normative Narratives. In The EU-Russian Energy Dialogue: Europe’s Future Energy Security, ed. P. Aalto, 23–42. Ashgate: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  2. Aalto, P. (ed.). 2012. Russia´s Energy Policies. National, Interregional and Global Levels. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Alieva, L., and B. Aslanov. 2018. How Autocracy Impedes De-securitization, or Why Democracy Matters: The Case of Nagorno-Karabagh in the Eyes of Azerbaijanis. Caucasus Survey 6(3): 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashton, C. 2012. Situation in Russia (Debate). Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  5. Ashton, C. 2014. Catherine Ashton Speech on EU Foreign and Security Policy to the European Parliament, 4 April.Google Scholar
  6. Bahgat, G. 2006. Europe´s Energy Security: Challenges and Opportunities. International Affairs 82(5): 961–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balzacq, T., S. Léonard, and J. Ruzicka. 2016. ‘Securitization’ Revisited: Theory and Cases. International Relations 30(4): 494–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barroso, J. M. 2011. Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso Give a News Conference Following the Meeting of the Russian Government and the EU Commission, 24 February.Google Scholar
  9. Barroso, J. M. 2012a. EU-Russia SummitPresident Barroso´s Main Messages, 21 December.Google Scholar
  10. Barroso, J. M. 2012b. Empowering the World: Can Europe Bring an End to Energy Poverty in Our Lifetime? 16 April.Google Scholar
  11. Barroso, J. M. 2014a. Speech by President Barroso at the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy University, 14 June.Google Scholar
  12. Barroso, J. M. 2014b. The European Union in the New World Order, Yale School of Management, 21 September.Google Scholar
  13. Barroso, J. M. 2014c. Remarks by President Barroso Following His Meeting with the Prime Minister of Estonia, Mr Taavi Rõivas, 28 May.Google Scholar
  14. Birchfield, V.L., and J.S. Duffield (eds.). 2011. Toward a Common European Union Energy Policy. Problems, Progress, and Prospects. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. Thematic Analysis. In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2. Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, ed. H. Cooper et al., 57–71. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. De Wilde. 1997. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Cañete, M. A. 2015a. EU-Energiekommissar Miguel Arias Cañete „Neue Leitungen sind wichtig. Handelsblatt, 10 March.Google Scholar
  19. Cañete, M. A. 2015b. Commissioner Arias Cañete at the European Parliament Plenary: Opening and Concluding Remarks, 7 October 2015.Google Scholar
  20. Cañete, M. A. 2015c. Speech by Commissioner Arias Cañete at the Gas Infrastructure Europe 13th Annual Conference, 23 April.Google Scholar
  21. Cañete, M. A. 2015d. Speech of Commissioner Miguel Arias Cañete at the Energy Union Conference in Riga, 6 February.Google Scholar
  22. Cañete, M. A. 2017. ‘Eurokomisár Cañete: Plyn má potenciál v námornej a nákladnej doprave’ [Commissioner Cañete: Gas has the potential for maritime and freight transport], Euractiv.sk, 31 March.Google Scholar
  23. Cañete, M. A. 2018. Speech by Commissioner Miguel Arias Cañete at the 4th EU Energy Summit: International Geopolitical Uncertainties: Brakes or Accelerators for the EU Energy Transition? 12 April.Google Scholar
  24. Cañete, M. A. 2019. Energy Union: Commission Welcomes Tonight’s Provisional Political Agreement to Ensure That Pipelines with Third Countries Comply with EU Gas Rules, 12 February.Google Scholar
  25. Carta, Catherina., and Jean.-Frederic. Morin (eds.). 2014. EU Foreign Policy Through the Lens of Discourse Analysis. Making Sense of Diversity. Ashgate: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  26. Dannreuther, R. 2016. EU-Russia Energy Relations in Context. Geopolitics 21(4): 913–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dias, V.A. 2013. The EU and Russia: Competing Discourses, Practices and Interests in the Shared Neighbourhood. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14(2): 256–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ederer, M. 2017. ‘Posol ES: v otsenke otnosheniy s Rossiyey prichin dlya eyforii poka net’ [EU ambassador: there is no reason for euphoria in assessing relations with Russia], Ria Novosti, 21 December.Google Scholar
  29. European Commission. 2014a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. European Energy Security Strategy, COM (2014) 330 final, 28 May.Google Scholar
  30. European Commission. 2014b. Energy Security: Commission Puts Forward Comprehensive Strategy to Strengthen Security of Supply, IP/14/606, 28 May.Google Scholar
  31. European Commission. 2015a. State of the Energy Union 2015, COM (2015) 572 final, 18 November.Google Scholar
  32. European Commission. 2015b. A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy, COM(2015) 80 final, 25 February.Google Scholar
  33. European Commission. 2017a. Commission Seeks a Mandate from Member States to Negotiate with Russia an Agreement on Nord Stream 2, 9 June.Google Scholar
  34. European Commission. 2017b. Third Report on the State of the Energy Union, 27 November.Google Scholar
  35. European Commission. 2018. Antitrust: Commission Imposes Binding Obligations on Gazprom to Enable Free Flow of Gas at Competitive Prices in Central and Eastern European Gas Markets, 24 May.Google Scholar
  36. European Parliament. 2014. MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Situation in Ukraine and the State of Play of EU-Russia Relations (2014/2841(RSP)), 16 September.Google Scholar
  37. European Parliament. 2016a. MEPs Voice Grave Concerns about Nord Stream 2 Project, Plenary Sessions, 10 May.Google Scholar
  38. European Parliament. 2016b. The EU’s Russia Policy. Five Guiding Principles, Briefing, October.Google Scholar
  39. European Parliament. 2018. The EU’s Russia Policy. Five Guiding Principles, Briefing, February.Google Scholar
  40. Ferrara, Domenico. 2010. Rethinking EU-Russia Energy Relations: a Narrative/Discursive Approach. PEER CONFERENCE: Governing Energy between Europe and Russia, University of Warwick, 3rd–4th September.Google Scholar
  41. Fierke, K.M. 2002. Links Across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 46(3): 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gariup, M. 2009. European Security Culture: Language, Theory, Policy. Ashgate: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  43. Georgiou, N. A. and Rocco, A. 2017. Energy Governance in EU-Russia Energy Relations: Paving the Way Towards an Energy Union. Available at goo.gl/uWsgMJ, Accessed 1 May 2019.Google Scholar
  44. Gilpin, R.G. 1984. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization 38(2): 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goddard, A., and N. Carey. 2017. Discourse: The Basics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Hansen, L. 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Heinrich, A., and K. Szulecki. 2018. Energy Securitisation: Applying the Copenhagen School’s Framework to Energy. In Energy Security in Europe. Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges, ed. K. Szulecki, 33–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Javadi, M. and Zarea, K. 2016. Understanding Thematic Analysis and Its Pitfalls. Journal of Client Care.  https://doi.org/10.15412/J.JCC.02010107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jewell, J., and E. Brutschin. 2019. The Politics of Energy Security. In The Oxford Handbook of Energy Politics, ed. K. Hancock and J. Allison. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Johnstone, B. 2018. Discourse Analysis (Introducing Linguistics). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. Jones, R. 2016. Spoken Discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  52. Judge, A., and T. Maltby. 2017. European Energy Union? Caught Between Securitisation and “Riskification”. European Journal of International Security 2(2): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Juncker, J.-C. 2016a. Speech by President Jean-Claude Juncker at the 20th Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum 2016, 16 June.Google Scholar
  54. Juncker, J.-C. 2016b. Speech by President Jean-Claude Juncker to the Plenary Session of the European Parliament on the Result of the Referendum in the United Kingdom, 28 June.Google Scholar
  55. Juncker, J.-C. 2018. EU-U.S. Joint Statement of 25 July: European Union Imports of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Are on the Rise, 9 August.Google Scholar
  56. Kester, J. 2018. The Politics of Energy Security: Critical Security Studies, New Materialism and Governmentality. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Khasson, V. 2009. Discourses and Interests in EU-Russia Energy Relations. Leuven: Institute for International and European Policy, available at http://soc.kuleuven.be/web/files/11/74/WP35-Khasson.pdf. Accessed 1 December 2018.
  58. Kratochvíl, P., and L. Tichý. 2013. EU and Russian discourse on energy relations. Energy Policy 44(5): 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kurze, K. 2010. The Changing Discourse of Energy Security. A New Impetus for Energy Policy Integration in the European Union. University of Osnabrueck: Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence in European Studies, available from: http://www.jmce.uni-osnabrueck.de/fileadmin/Download/EPS/TraPES.Kurze.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2018.
  60. Kuteleva, A. 2018. Discursive Politics of Energy in EU–Russia Relations. Problems of Post-Communism.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2018.152060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kuzemko, C. 2014. Ideas, Power and Change: Explaining EU–Russia Energy Relations. Journal of European Public Policy 21(1): 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Larsen, H. 1997. Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain and Europe. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Maguire, M., and B. Delahunt. 2017. Doing a Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching Scholars. AISHE-J 9(3): 3351–33514.Google Scholar
  64. Marín-Quemada, J.M., J. García-Verdugo, and G. Escribano (eds.). 2012. Energy Security for the EU in the 21st Century. Markets, Geopolitics and Corridors. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Marocchi, T. 2017. EU-Russia Relations: Towards an Increasingly Geopolitical Paradigm, available at https://eu.boell.org/en/2017/07/03/eu-russia-relations-towards-increasingly-geopolitical-paradigm. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  66. Mogherini, F. 2015. ‘Rebutting Controversy, EU Foreign Policy Chief Says Europe Is United on Russia’, CNN, 22 January.Google Scholar
  67. Mogherini, F. 2017. Speech by Federica Mogherini at the Munich Security Conference, 18 February.Google Scholar
  68. Mogherini, F. 2018. Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the European Parliament Plenary Session on the New Agenda for EU-Central Asia Relations, 14 March.Google Scholar
  69. Morgenthau, H., and K.W. Thompson. 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
  70. Mortensen, D. 2019. How to Do a Thematic Analysis of User Interviews. Available at https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/how-to-do-a-thematic-analysis-ofuser-interviews. Accessed 1 May 2019.
  71. Nowell, L.S., et al. 2017. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Oettinger, G. 2010. Speech by Commissioner Oettinger at the Moscow International Energy Forum, 8 April.Google Scholar
  73. Oettinger, G. 2011. Speech of Commissioner Oettinger at the South Stream Event, 25 May.Google Scholar
  74. Oettinger, G. 2012. Energy Dialogue: Russia-European Union. Gas Aspects, 27 April.Google Scholar
  75. Oettinger, G. 2013. A Transatlantic Energy Revolution: Europe´s Energy Diversification and US Unconventional Oil and Gas, 17 July.Google Scholar
  76. Oettinger, G. 2014a. ‘Gas Is Not the Instrument of Politics’, Stuttgarter Zeitung, 24 March.Google Scholar
  77. Oettinger, G. 2014b. ‘EU Wants Same Price for Russian Gas for All Its Members’, Euractiv, 2 May.Google Scholar
  78. Oettinger, G. 2014c. ‘Oettinger: Nur kurzfristige Probleme durch Russland’ [Oettinger: Only short-term problems by Russia], DeutschlandFunk, 16 March.Google Scholar
  79. Oettinger, G. 2014d. The European Energy Policy for 2020 and Beyond, 19 June.Google Scholar
  80. Oxenstierna, S., and V.-P. Tynkkynen (eds.). 2014. Russian Energy and Security up to 2030. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Phillips, N., and C. Hardy. 2002. Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. London: Sage Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Romanova, T. 2016. Is Russian Energy Policy towards the EU Only about Geopolitics? The Case of the Third Liberalisation Package. Geopolitics 21(4): 857–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Šefčovič, M. 2014. Speech on Building a Euro Mediterranean Energy Bridge, High Level Conference, 18 November.Google Scholar
  84. Šefčovič, M. 2015a. ‘„Wir suchen für Europa Alternativen zu russischem Gas“’ [„We are looking for alternatives to Russian gas for Europe“], Die Welt, 26 October.Google Scholar
  85. Šefčovič, M. 2015b. ‘Sefcovic: The Commission Will Respond to Nord Stream’s Critics’, EURACTIV.com, 2 December.Google Scholar
  86. Šefčovič, M. 2015c. Keynote Speech at the EU Energy Security Conference 2015 Organised by European Court of Auditors, 5 May.Google Scholar
  87. Šefčovič, M. 2015d. Speech at the University of Malta, 9 November.Google Scholar
  88. Šefčovič, M. 2016a. ‘Interview Maroš Šefčovič, EU VP Energy Union’, Energy Post Weekly, 7 October.Google Scholar
  89. Šefčovič, M. 2016b. Speech by Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič on “Nord Stream IIEnergy Union at the Crossroads”, 6 April.Google Scholar
  90. Šefčovič, M. 2016c. Speech at the Ukraine Energy Forum in Kyiv: ”EU-UA Energy Partnership: What’s Achieved and What’s NextAn EU Perspective”, 1–3 March.Google Scholar
  91. Šefčovič, M. 2016d. Maroš Šefčovič on the Energy Union and Its Role for Central and Southeastern Europe. Electromagazine, 29 June.Google Scholar
  92. Šefčovič, M. 2017. Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič on the Significance of Trans-Atlantic Energy Cooperation between the EU and the US, 8 March.Google Scholar
  93. Šefčovič, M. 2018a. Speech at the Conference ‘CEE Gas GatewayUkrainian Gas Transmission System Contribution to the Energy Security in Europe’ in Brussels, 25 May.Google Scholar
  94. Šefčovič, M. 2018b. Statement by Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič on the opening of TANAP, 12 June.Google Scholar
  95. Šefčovič, M. 2019. Statement by Vice-President for Energy Union Maroš Šefčovič following the trilateral talks with Russia and Ukraine on the future of gas transit via Ukraine, 21 January.Google Scholar
  96. Siddi, M. 2018. Identities and Vulnerabilities: The Ukraine Crisis and the Securitisation of the EU-Russia Gas Trade. In Energy Security in Europe. Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges, ed. K. Szulecki, 251–273. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  97. Szulecki, K. (ed.). 2018. Energy Security in Europe. Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  98. Tichý, L. 2019a. EU-Russia Energy Relations: A Discursive Approach. Cham: Springe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tichý, L. 2019b. The Diversification Discourse of Russia and Its Energy Relations with the EU. Asia Europe Journal 17(2): 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tichý, L., and P. Kratochvíl. 2014. The EU-Russia Energy Relations Under the Prism of the Political Discourse. Perspectives 22(1): 5–32.Google Scholar
  101. Tusk, D. 2015a. Address by President Donald Tusk at Die Europa-Rede, 10 November.Google Scholar
  102. Tusk, D. 2015b. Remarks by President Donald Tusk after the First Session of the European Council Meeting, 19 March.Google Scholar
  103. Tusk, D. 2016. Report by President Donald Tusk to the European Parliament on the European Council Meeting of 2021 October 2016, 21 October.Google Scholar
  104. Tusk, D. 2018. Report by President Donald Tusk to the European Parliament on December European Council Meetings, 16 January.Google Scholar
  105. Ušackas, V. 2014a. Speech by the Head of the EU Delegation to Russia at a Seminar on EU-Russia Relations, 21 February.Google Scholar
  106. Ušackas, V. 2014b. ‘Sankcii ES v otnoshenii Rossii’ [EU sanctions against Russia], Radio ECHO, 25 June.Google Scholar
  107. Ušackas, V. 2014c. Priorities of the Greek Presidency of the Council and Debate on EU-Russia Relations, 19 February.Google Scholar
  108. Ušackas, V. 2016a. ‘Vigaudas Ushatskas: resheniye ob otkaze ot “Yuzhnogo potoka” prinimal ne ES’ [Vigaudas Ušackas: the decision to abandon South Stream was not taken by the EU], Ria Novosti, 10 February.Google Scholar
  109. Ušackas, V. 2016b. Speech by Vygaudas Ušackas, Ambassador of the European Union to the Russian Federation, at Panel Discussion “Russia and Europe: Economic Perspectives”, 13 January.Google Scholar
  110. Valenzuela, M. F. 2012. ‘Predstoyashiy Sammit Rossija - ES. Vrucchenije Evropejskomu Sojuzu Nobelevskoj premii mira’ [The upcoming Russia-EU Summit. Presentation of the European Union Nobel Peace Prize], radio ECHO, 10 December.Google Scholar
  111. Van Dijk, T.A. (ed.). 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  112. Van Rompuy, H. 2014a. Remarks by President Herman Van Rompuy at the Business Forum “EU and Czech Republic, Ten Years Together”, 30 April.Google Scholar
  113. Van Rompuy, H. 2014b. Speech to the European Parliament Following the June 2627 European Council, 2 July.Google Scholar
  114. Waever, O. 1995. Securitization and Desecuritization. In On Security, ed. R. Lipschuts, 46–87. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Waring, H.Z. 2017. Discourse Analysis: The Questions Discourse Analysts Ask and How They Answer Them. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wisniewski, J. 2018. Securitizing European Energy Policy: Discourses of Energy Security in Germany, Poland and the UK. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of International Relations PraguePrague 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations