Advertisement

Social media populism: features and ‘likeability’ of Lega Nord communication on Facebook

  • Giuliano Bobba
Symposium

Abstract

Social media have changed the way politicians communicate with and relate to their constituencies during election campaigns and routine periods alike. Many scholars have postulated that populists would benefit most from the new digital media. Despite their growing importance, few studies have addressed the features of online populist communication and how to assess its success. The purpose of this article is to fill this gap by providing a framework for the analysis of populist communication on social media. Taking the case of Italy’s Lega Nord (Northern League (LN)) as an example, the article will clarify which aspects of online communication are most valued by LN supporters, in relation to both the key elements of populism (references to ‘the people’, ‘elites’ and ‘others’) and the expression of an emotional style in the messages. The article analyses the controlled communication that LN and its leader, Matteo Salvini, published on their Facebook profiles during a sample period of 30 days. Our findings demonstrate that populism, emotional style and, in general, the role of the leader as a source of communication positively affect the ‘likeability’ of a message.

Keywords

Social media Political communication Populism Northern league 

References

  1. Albertazzi, D., and D. McDonnell. 2010. The Lega Nord back in government. West European Politics 33(6): 1318–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albertazzi, D., and D. McDonnell. 2015. Populists in Power. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Albertazzi, D. and D. McDonnell (eds.). 2008. Twenty-first Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, J. 2014. Populism, social media and democratic strain. In European Populism and Winning the Immigration Debate, ed. C. Sandelind, 99–114. Falun: ScandBook.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. 2001. Community—Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Betz, H.G., and C. Johnson. 2004. Against the current—Stemming the tide: The nostalgic ideology of the contemporary radical populist right. Journal of Political Ideologies 9(3): 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bobba, G., and G. Legnante. 2016. Italy: a breeding ground for populist political communication. In Populist Political Communication in Europe. A Cross National Analysis of Twenty-Seven European Countries, ed. T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck and C. de Vreese, 222–234. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bobba, G., and D. McDonnell. 2015. Italy: a strong and enduring market for populism. In Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, ed. H. Kriesi and T.S. Pappas, 233–259. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  9. Caiani, M., and P.R. Graziano. 2016. Varieties of populism: insights from the Italian case. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 46(2): 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canovan, M. 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engesser, S., N. Ernst, F. Esser, and F. Büchel. 2017. Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society 20(8): 1109–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., and Esser, F. 2017. Extreme parties and populism: an analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries, Information, Communication & Society, advance online publication 29 May,  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333.
  13. Fieschi, C., and P. Heywood. 2004. Trust, cynicism and populist anti-politics. Journal of Political Ideologies 9(3): 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hameleers, M., L. Bos, and C.H. de Vreese. 2016. “They did it”. The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research 44(6): 870–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kioupkiolis, A., and Seoane Pérez, F. 2018. Reflexive technopopulism: Podemos and the search for a new left-wing hegemony. In Populist discourses and political communication in Southern Europe, symposium, European Political Science, ed. S. Salgado and Y. Stavrakakis.  https://10.1057/s41304-017-0140-9.
  17. Kitschelt, H. 2000. Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative Political Studies 33(6/7): 845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krämer, B. 2014. Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory 24(1): 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kriesi, H. 2014. The populist challenge. West European Politics 37(2): 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kühne, R. 2014. Political news, emotions, and opinion formation: Toward a model of emotional framing effects, (Working Paper No. 68), Zürich: National Centre of Competence in Research.Google Scholar
  21. Mazzoleni, G. 2003. The media and the growth of neo-populism in contemporary democracies. In The Media and Neo-populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis, ed. G. Mazzoleni, J. Stewart and B. Horsfield, 1–20. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  22. Mazzoleni, G. 2008. Populism and the media. In Twenty-first Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, ed. D. Albertazzi and D. McDonnell, 49–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mazzoleni, G. 2014. Mediatisation and political populism. In Mediatization of Politics. Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, ed. F. Esser and J. Strömbäck, 42–56. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. McDonnell, D. 2006. A weekend in Padania: Regionalist populism and the Lega Nord. Politics 26(2): 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonnell, D. 2013. Silvio Berlusconi’s personal parties: From Forza Italia to the Popolo della Libertà. Political Studies 61(S1): 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mudde, C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government & Opposition 39(4): 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mudde, C. 2014. Fighting the system? Populist radical right parties and party system change. Party Politics 20(2): 217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser. 2012. Populism and (liberal) democracy: A framework for analysis. In Populism in Europe and the Americas Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, ed. C. Mudde and C.R. Kaltwasser, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nabi, R.L. 2003. Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research 30(2): 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Panizza, F. (ed.). 2005. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  32. Ruzza, C., and S. Fella. 2011. Populism and the Italian right. Acta Politica 46: 158–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salgado, S. 2018. Where’s populism? Online media and the diffusion of populist discourses and styles in Portugal. In Populist discourses and political communication in Southern Europe, symposium, European Political Science, ed. S. Salgado and Y. Stavrakakis.  http://10.1057/s41304-017-0137-4.
  34. Spektorowski, A. 2003. Ethnoregionalism: The intellectual new right and the Lega Nord. Global Review of Ethnopolitics 2(3): 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stavrakakis, Y. and Katsambekis, G. 2018. The populism/anti-populism frontier and its mediation in crisis-ridden Greece: From discursive divide to emerging cleavage? In Populist discourses and political communication in Southern Europe, symposium in European Political Science, ed. S. Salgado and Y. Stavrakakis.  https://10.1057/s41304-017-0138-3.
  36. Taggart, P. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tarchi, M. 2015. Italy: The promised land of populism? Contemporary Italian Politics 7(3): 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van der Brug, W., and A. Mughan. 2007. Charisma, Leader effects and support for right-wing populist parties. Party Politics 13(1): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weyland, K. 2001. Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics 34(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cultures Politics and SocietyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  2. 2.Collegio Carlo AlbertoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations