Advertisement

Development

, Volume 60, Issue 1–2, pp 83–89 | Cite as

Imagine a Feminist Internet

  • Jac sm Kee
Dialogue

Abstract

We are in an age increasingly shaped and inflected by digital and networked technologies, which can act to augment, amplify or disrupt existing discrimination, exclusion and inequality. Using the Feminist Principles of the internet as a framework, this article examines the different facets of the intersection between digitally networked technologies and feminism at the areas of economy, autonomy and data, as well as movement building. It calls for the recognition, exploration and participation of diverse actors in feminist and women’s movements into making a feminist internet.

Keywords

Feminist internet Movement building Alternative digital economies Intersectionality Autonomy 

References

  1. APC. 2014. ‘Take Back The Tech’s Report Card on Social Media and Violence Against Women’, Take Back the Tech!. https://www.takebackthetech.net/sites/default/files/2014-reportcard-en.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  2. APC. 2015a. ‘End Violence: Women’s Rights and Safety online Country Partners, Cases on Women’s Experiences of Technology-Related VAW and Their Access to Justice’, GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/node/4221/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  3. APC. 2015b. ‘End Violence: Case Studies from Mexico’, GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/node/4238/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  4. APC. 2015c. ‘From Impunity to Justice: Domestic Legal Remedies for Cases of Technology-Related Violence Against Women’, GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/sites/default/upload/flow_domestic_legal_remedies.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  5. Bytes for All. 2014. ‘End Violence: Case Studies from Pakistan’, GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/node/4239/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  6. Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir and Comisión Mexicana de Defensa y Promoción de los Derechos Humanos. 2012. ‘Femicide and Impunity in Mexico: A Context of Structural and Generalized Violence’. Presented at the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/ngos/CDDandCMDPDH_forthesession_Mexico_CEDAW52.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  8. Cukier, Kenneth Neil and Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger. 2013. ‘The Rise of Big Data’, Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2013-04-03/rise-big-data. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  9. Desai, Shweta. 2014. ‘India’s Barefoot College Lights up the World’, Al Jazeera. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/01/india-barefoot-college-lights-up-world-201411464325362590.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  10. Ditmore, Melissa Hope. 2014. ‘Thirty Years after 1984: Who’s Looking at You?’ GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/articles/thirty-years-after-1984-who-s-looking-you. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  11. Evans, Claire L. 2014. ‘“We are the Future Cunt”: Cyberfeminism in the 90s’, Motherboard. http://motherboard.vice.com/read/we-are-the-future-cunt-cyberfeminism-in-the-90s. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  12. Fischer, Mia and K. Mohrman. 2016. ‘Black Deaths Matter? Sousveillance and Invisibility of Black Life’. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology 10. http://adanewmedia.org/2016/10/issue10-fischer-mohrman/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  13. Gander, Kashmira. 2016. ‘The Escorts’ Website Where Sex Workers Share Warnings about Dangerous Customers’, Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/the-escorts-website-where-sex-workers-share-warnings-about-dangerous-customers-a7423646.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  14. Gent, Edd. 2016. ‘How India’s “Smart Villages” Are Centralising Solar Power’, BBC. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-36681112. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  15. Gourarie, Chava. 2016. ‘Investigating the Algorithms that Govern Our Lives’. Columbia Journalism Review. http://www.cjr.org/innovations/investigating_algorithms.php. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  16. Gurumurthy, Anita. 2016. ‘Data: The New Four-Letter Word for Feminism’. GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/node/4738/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  17. Gurumurthy, Anita and Nandini Chami. 2015. ‘New Readings of the Tea Cup—Revisiting Gender Justice in the Information Society’, GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/node/4416/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  18. Haraway, Donna. 1985. ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’, Socialist Review 15(2): 65–107. Republished Haraway, Donna (1991) ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century’, in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Harry, Sydette. 2014. ‘Everyone Watches, Nobody Sees: How Black Women Disrupt Surveillance Theory’, Model View Culture. https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/everyone-watches-nobody-sees-how-black-women-disrupt-surveillance-theory. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  20. Hexe. 2014. ‘Sex Work and Surveillance’, Model View Culture. https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/sex-work-and-surveillance. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  21. Internet Governance Forum. 2015. ‘Best Practice Forum Online Abuse and Gender-Based Violence Against Women’, http://intgovforum.org/cms/documents/best-practice-forums/623-bpf-online-abuse-and-gbv-against-women. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  22. Internet Governance Forum. 2016. ‘Best Practice Forum Gender and Access’, http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/index.php?q=filedepot_download/3406/437. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  23. Jonnalagadda, Kiran. 2016. ‘A Rant on Aadhar (Unique Identification Number)’, Medium. https://medium.com/@jackerhack/a-rant-on-aadhaar-6213e002f064#.c5npmokqi. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  24. Kaye, David. 2015. ‘Report on Encryption, Anonymity, and the Human Rights Framework, 29th Session of UN Human Rights Council (A/HRC/29/32)’, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/CallForSubmission.aspx. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  25. Kaye, David. 2016. ‘Freedom of Expression and the Private Sector in the Digital Age, (A/HRC/32/38)’, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/Privatesectorinthedigitalage.aspx. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  26. Kee, Jac sm. 2016. ‘It Takes A Village: Feminism and Technology’, http://www.forum.awid.org/forum16/posts/it-takes-village. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  27. Kee, Jac sm and Sonia Randhawa. 2009. ‘Malaysia: Violence Against Women and Information Communication Technologies’. http://www.genderit.org/resources/malaysia-violence-against-women-and-information-communication-technologies. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  28. Kee, Jac sm et al. 2011. ‘EROTICS: Sex, Rights and the Internet’, APC.org. http://www.apc.org/en/system/files/EROTICS.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  29. Little, Anita. 2013. ‘#FBrape Campaign Takes on Facebook Misogyny and Wins!’, Ms. Magazine Blog. http://msmagazine.com/blog/2013/05/30/fbrape-campaign-takes-on-facebook-misogyny-and-wins/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  30. Macaskill, Ewen and Gabriel Dance. 2013. ‘NSA Files Decoded: What the Revelations Mean for You, Part 3’, The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded#section/3. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  31. Manjikian, Mary. 2015. ‘The Magic of Completeness and the Politics of Invisibility: A Feminist Theory of Big Data’, unpublished report, New Orleans: International Studies Association. http://www.academia.edu/11010983/The_Magic_of_Completeness_and_the_Politics_of_Invisibility_A_Feminist_Response_to_Big_Data. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  32. McAllister, Jenny. 2016. ‘Automation Will Embed Gender Inequality at Work—Unless We Fix It Now’, The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/nov/09/automation-will-embed-gender-inequality-at-work-unless-we-fix-it-now. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  33. Moawad, Nadine. 2016. ‘How Internet Technology Will Affect Rights: 3 Things to Look For’, GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/editorial/editorial-how-internet-technology-will-affect-rights-3-things-look. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  34. Monahan, Torin. 2009. ‘Dreams of Control at a Distance: Gender, Surveillance, and Social Control’, Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies 9(2): 286–305. http://publicsurveillance.com/papers/Dreams_of_control.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  35. Prakash, Nidhi and Rafa Fernandez de Castro. 2016. ‘Women Turn Hashtag Protest into Movement Against Violence and Sexual Harassment’, Fusion. http://fusion.net/story/295309/mexican-women-turn-hashtag-protest-into-movement-against-violence-and-sexual-harassment/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  36. Prinsloo, Jeanne et al. 2011. ‘Exploring Transgender and Lesbian Use of the Internet in South Africa’, GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/sites/default/upload/erotics_finalresearch_apcwnsp.pdf#southafrica. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  37. Smedley, Tim. 2013. ‘Smart Cities: Adapting the Concept for the Global South’, The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2013/nov/21/smart-cities-relevant-developing-world. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  38. Shah, Manali. 2017. ‘Beyond the Hashtags: How Online Activism Led to Women Reclaiming the Street’, Hindustan Times. http://www.hindustantimes.com/art-and-culture/beyond-the-hashtags-how-online-activism-led-to-women-reclaiming-the-street/story-WkG0yO2BBBjgAACPCkbQHN.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  39. Shephard, Nicole. 2016. ‘Algorhithmic Discrimination and the Feminist Politics of Being in the Data’, GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/node/4864/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  40. Toole, Betty Alexandra. 1998. Ada, the Enchantress of Numbers: Prophet of the Computer Age. Moreton-in-Marsh: Strawberry Press.Google Scholar
  41. UNHRC. 2012. ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences’. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session20/A.HRC.20.16_En.PDF. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  42. UNHRC. 2014a. ‘Resolution on the Safety of Journalists (A/HRC/RES/27/5)’. http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/RES/27/5. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  43. UNHRC. 2014b. ‘Resolution on Protecting Human Rights Defenders, Whether Individuals, Groups or Organs of Society, Addressing Economic, Social and Cultural rights (A/HRC/RES/31/32). http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/RES/31/32. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  44. Women’s Legal and Human Rights Bureau. 2014. ‘Domestic Legal Remedies for Technology-Related Violence Against Women: Review of Related Studies and Literature’, GenderIT. http://www.genderit.org/node/4068/. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.

Copyright information

© Society for International Development 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jac sm Kee
    • 1
  1. 1.Association for Progressive CommunicationsKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations