Advertisement

Crime Prevention and Community Safety

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 22–41 | Cite as

Expectations versus effects regarding police surveillance cameras in a municipal park

  • Ray SuretteEmail author
  • Matthew Stephenson
Original Article

Abstract

Surveillance cameras have become a popular response to crime and disorder in urban parks. The literature regarding park surveillance cameras however is sparse and few have examined the impact of park surveillance cameras. This research study examined a five camera police department network in a southern US municipal park. The study measured pre- and post-camera effects on reported crime, calls for service, and park visitor perceptions. Analysis determined that although the surveillance cameras had minimal impact on crime or disorder they were related to park visitor perceptions of the park. A camera surveilled park was seen more positively following police camera installation even though perceptions of the effectiveness of surveillance cameras decreased.

Keywords

Parks and crime Surveillance cameras Deterrence Public perceptions CPTED 

References

  1. Atlas, R.I. 2013. 21st Century Security and CPTED: Designing for Critical Infrastructure Protection and Crime Prevention. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, T., and L. Wolfer. 2003. The Crime Triangle: Alcohol, Drug Use, and Vandalism. Police Practice and Research 4(1): 47–61.Google Scholar
  3. Baur, J.W., J.F. Tynon, and E. Gómez. 2013. Attitudes about Urban Nature Parks: A Case Study of Users and Nonusers in Portland, Oregon. Landscape and Urban Planning 117: 100–111.Google Scholar
  4. Braga, A. 2005. Hot Spots Policing and Crime Prevention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology 1(3): 317–342.Google Scholar
  5. Braga, A., A. Papachristos, and D. Hureau. 2014. The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly 31(4): 633–663.Google Scholar
  6. Bricker, K.S., W.W. Hendricks, J.B. Greenwood, and C.A. Aschenbrenner. 2016. Californians’ Perceptions of the Influence of Parks and Recreation on Quality of Life. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 34(3): 64–82.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, R.V.G. (ed.). 1997. Situational Crime Prevention, 53–70. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, R.V. 2009. Situational Crime Prevention: Theoretical Background and Current Practice. In Handbook on Crime and Deviance, ed. M. Krohn, A. Lizotte, and G.P. Hall, 259–276. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, D.A., D. Golinelli, S. Williamson, A. Sehgal, T. Marsh, and T.L. McKenzie. 2009. Effects of Park Improvements on Park Use and Physical Activity: Policy and Programming Implications. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 37(6): 475–480.Google Scholar
  10. Crowe, T.D., and L.J. Fennelly. 2013. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  11. Ekblom, P. 2010. Crime Prevention, Security and Community Safety Using the 5Is Framework. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Fussey, P. 2007. Observing Potentiality in the Global City: Surveillance and Counterterrorism in London. International Criminal Justice Review 17(3): 171–192.Google Scholar
  13. Gill, M. 2003. CCTV. Kent, England: Perpetuity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goold, B.J. 2004. CCTV and Policing: Public Area Surveillance and Police Practices in Britain. London, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Groff, E., and E.S. McCord. 2012. The Role of Neighborhood Parks as Crime Generators. Security Journal 25(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
  16. Hempel, L., and E. Töpfer. 2009. The Surveillance Consensus: Reviewing the Politics of CCTV in Three European Countries. European Journal of Criminology 6(2): 157–177.Google Scholar
  17. Iqbal, A., and V. Ceccato. 2016. Is CPTED Useful to Guide the Inventory of Safety in Parks? A Case Study in Stockholm, Sweden. International Criminal Justice Review 26(2): 150–168.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of American Cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  19. Jeffery, C.R. 1977. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Knutsson, J. 1997. Restoring Public Order in a City Park. In Policing for Prevention Reducing Crime, Public Intoxication and Injury, vol. 7, ed. R. Homel and M. Hauritz, 133–151. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  21. McCord, E.S., and K.A. Houser. 2017. Neighborhood Parks, Evidence of Guardianship, and Crime in Two Diverse US Cities. Security Journal 30(3): 807–824.Google Scholar
  22. McCormick, J.G., and S.M. Holland. 2015. Strategies in Use to Reduce Incivilities, Provide Security and Reduce Crime in Urban Parks. Security Journal 28(4): 374–391.Google Scholar
  23. Pavone, V., and S.D. Esposti. 2012. Public Assessment of New Surveillance-oriented Security Technologies: Beyond the Trade-Off Between Privacy and Security. Public Understanding of Science 21(5): 556–572.Google Scholar
  24. Ratcliffe, J., T. Taniguchi, and R. Taylow. 2009. The Crime Reduction Effects of Public CCTV Cameras: A Multi-Method Spatial Approach. Justice Quarterly 26(4): 746–770.Google Scholar
  25. Reynald, D.M. 2015. Environmental Design and Crime Events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 31(1): 71–89.Google Scholar
  26. Surette, R. 2006. CCTV and Citizen Guardianship Suppression: A Questionable Proposition. Police Quarterly 9(1): 100–125.Google Scholar
  27. Surette, R. 2011. An Evaluation of the Orlando Police Department Lake Eola Park IRIS Camera System Final Report. Department of Criminal Justice, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  28. Surette, R. 2015. Media, Crime and Criminal Justice. Stamford, CT: Cengage.Google Scholar
  29. Telep, C., and D. Weisburd. 2012. What is Known About the Effectiveness of Police Practices in Reducing Crime and Disorder? Police Quarterly 15(4): 331–357.Google Scholar
  30. Tilley, N. 2005. Handbook of Crime Prevention Community Safety. New York, NY: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Tower, S.M., and E. Groff. 2016. Examining the Disorder–Crime Connection in Philadelphia Parks. Security Journal 29(3): 520–537.Google Scholar
  32. Weisburd, D., and J.E. Eck. 2004. What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593(1): 42–65.Google Scholar
  33. Welsh, B.C., and D.P. Farrington. 2002. Evidence-Based Crime Prevention: The Effectiveness of CCTV. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 6(2): 21–33.Google Scholar
  34. Welsh, B.C., and D.P. Farrington. 2004. Surveillance for Crime Prevention in Public Space: Results and Policy Choices in Britain and America. Criminology and Public Policy 3(3): 497–526.Google Scholar
  35. Welsh, B.C., and D.P. Farrington. 2009. Public Area CCTV and Crime Prevention: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Justice Quarterly 26(4): 716–745.Google Scholar
  36. Westover, T.N. 1985. Perceptions of Rule Compliance and Law Enforcement in Urban and Suburban Parks. Recreation Research Review 12(2): 22–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations