To what extent is revictimization risk mitigated by police prevention advice after a previous burglary?
This article investigates the effect of police prevention visits to recently burgled households on revictimization risk, using data on 8984 burgled houses in Adelaide, South Australia. We compare burgled dwellings whose inhabitants got advice with burgled dwellings whose inhabitants did not accept the offer of a prevention visit, and with burgled dwellings that did not get an offer at all. Using survival analysis, we estimate the effect size of the impact of prevention visits on revictimization risk. More than one in five cases of revictimization has been prevented through the prevention visit scheme.
KeywordsPrevention advice Burglary Revictimization Survival analysis Australia
- Blossfeld, H.P., A. Hamerle, and K.U. Mayer. 1989. Event history analysis. Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Grove, L.E., G. Farrell, D.P. Farrington, and S.D. Johnson. 2012. Preventing repeat victimization: A systematic review. Stockholm: Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention/Brottsförebyggande rådet–Brå.Google Scholar
- Morgan, F., and C. Walter. 2002. The South Australian residential break and enter pilot project: Outcome evaluation: Full report volume. Canberra: Attorney-General’s Department.Google Scholar
- Pease, K. 1998. Repeat victimisation: Taking stock. Crime prevention and detection series. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
- Pease, K., and G. Laycock. 1996. Revictimisation: Reducing the heat on hot victims. Research in action. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar