Crime Prevention and Community Safety

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 113–124 | Cite as

Foot patrols and crime prevention in Harare Central Business District: police officers’ perspectives

Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Despite the advent of modern crime control methods, chiefly brought about by technological advancement, foot patrol has remained as one of the crucial crime prevention methods in both the developed and developing world. This study was aimed at describing the implementation of foot beat patrols in Harare Central Business District (CBD), Zimbabwe. The study also attempted to gauge perceptions from police officers on the effectiveness of foot beat patrols as a crime control strategy. The study revealed that hot spot patrols and high visibility are the most widely used patrol initiatives in Harare CBD. Foot patrols were widely viewed to be effective in reducing specific crimes/problems such as assault, loitering, touts, plain robbery and pick pocketing. It was also felt that reduction in specific crimes within the central business district also lowers the aggregate crime levels for the whole city. Reduction in fear of crime and provision of a reassuring presence were also considered to be the major benefits of foot patrols by community representatives.

Keywords

Foot patrol Hot spots Police visibility Community policing 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bond, C., and D. Gow. 1996. Policing the beat: The experience in Toowoomba, Queensland. Crime Prevention Studies 7: 153–173.Google Scholar
  2. Braga, A.A. 2001. The effects of hot spots policing on crime. The Annals of American Political and Social Science 578: 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braga, A.A. 2007. The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Campbell Collaboration systematic review final report. Available online at: http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/download/118/.
  4. Bratton, G. 2000. Crime placement, displacement, and deflection. Chicago: An Annual Review of Research, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bruce, C.W. 2008. Police strategies and tactics: What every analyst should know. International Association of Crime Analysts, July 31.Google Scholar
  6. Esbensen, F.A. 1987. Foot patrols: Of what value. American Journal of Police 6: 45–65.Google Scholar
  7. Greene, J.R., ed. 2007. Patrol, types and effectiveness of. In The encyclopedia of police science, vol. 1, 898–899. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  8. Jones, N., and M. Tilley. 2004. Understanding and preventing police corruption: Lessons from the literature. London: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  9. Kelling, G.L., A. Pate, A. Ferrara, M. Utne, and C.E. Brown. 1981. The Newark foot patrol experiment. Washington: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Kelling, G.L., T. Pate, D. Dieckman, and C.E. Brown. 1974. The Kansas city preventive patrol experiment: A summary report. Washington: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Kelling, G., M. Antony, and D. Pate. 2004. The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment: Technical report. Washington: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Lum, C., C. Koper, and C.W. Telep. 2011. The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology 7: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McGarrell, C., M. James, and D. Shepherd. 2001a. Watching police, watching communities. London: Routledge Publisher.Google Scholar
  14. McGarrell, E.F., S. Chermak, A. Weiss, and J. Wilson. 2001b. Reducing firearms violence through directed police patrol. Criminology and Public Policy 1: 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Melenka, N.K.M. 2016. Exploring the long-term impact of a Foot Patrol policing Initiative in North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Masters Dissertation: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  16. Piza, E.L., and B.A. O’Hara. 2012. Saturation foot patrol in a high-violence area: A quasi-experimental evaluation. Justice Quarterly 31(4): 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.668923.Google Scholar
  17. Piza, E.L., and B.A. O’Hara. 2014. Saturation foot-patrol in a high-violence area: A quasi-experimental evaluation. Justice Quarterly 31(4): 693–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ratcliffe, J.H., T. Taniguchi, E.R. Groff, and J.D. Wood. 2011. The Philadelphia foot patrol experiment: A randomized controlled trial of police patrol effectiveness in violent crime hotspots. Criminology 49(3): 795–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenfeld, R. 2014. Crime and inflation in cross-national perspectives. Crime and Justice 43(1): 341–366.  https://doi.org/10.1086/677665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sherman, L., and H. Weisburd. 2012. Scandal and reform: Controlling police corruption. New York: Berkeley Publisher.Google Scholar
  21. Skogan, C., and D. Frydl. 2004. What works in policing. New York: Anderson Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, T.R., and J. Scott. 2013. Policing and crime prevention. In Crime prevention, ed. D.A. Mackey and K. Levan, 61–92. Burlington: Hones & Bartlet Learning.Google Scholar
  23. Telep, G., and Y. Weisburd. 2012. The politics of the police. London: Hemel Hempstead Publisher.Google Scholar
  24. Tuffin, M., L. Maxerolle, and J. Roehl. 2006. Controlling drug and disorder problems: The role of place managers. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Wakefield, J. 2006. Varieties of police behaviour. Cambridge: Mass Publisher.Google Scholar
  26. Wilson, Y. 2013. The politics of the police. London: Hemel Hempstead Publisher.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Intelligence and Security StudiesBindura University of Science EducationBinduraZimbabwe

Personalised recommendations