Self-guardianship at automated teller machines
Automated teller machines (ATMs) are central to the functioning of developed economies, but by their very nature operate without human supervision, making them vulnerable to criminal abuse. This study sought to understand how customers protect themselves from theft while using ATMs. Observations of and surveys with ATM customers were used to identify how individuals protect themselves from theft of cash, card or personal details while using an ATM. The most common self-guardianship measure was to use only ATMs believed to be safe. The majority of customers did not cover the ATM keypad while entering their personal identification number, despite long-running publicity campaigns encouraging this behaviour. This suggests that self-guardianship is important at ATMs, but many customers fail to take even basic measures to protect themselves, their money and their bank details from theft. Banks and crime-prevention practitioners should do more to facilitate and encourage self-guardianship at ATMs.
KeywordsAutomated teller machine Situational crime prevention Self-guardianship
The authors thank the Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc for funding and facilitating this research, as well as staff of the Metropolitan Police Service, the London Borough of Camden and the City of Westminster for their assistance.
- Barthe, E. 2006. Crime prevention publicity campaigns. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Braz, C., A. Seffah, and D. M’Raihi. 2007. Designing a trade-off between usability and security: A metrics based-model. In Human–computer interaction—interact 2007, Part II, vol. 4663, ed. C. Baranauskas, P. Palanque, J. Abascal, and S.D. Junqueira Barbosa, 114–126. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74800-7_9.Google Scholar
- Clarke, R.V. 1997. Introduction. In Situational crime prevention: Successful case studiesdies, ed. R.V. Clarke, 1–43. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
- Cramér, H. 1946. Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- De Luca, A., M. Langheinrich, and H. Hussmann. 2010. Towards understanding ATM security–a field study of real world ATM use. In Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), ed. L. Cranor. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/1837110.1837131.
- Eck, J.E. 1995. A general model of the geography of illicit retail marketplaces. In Crime and place, ed. J.E. Eck, and D. Weisburd, 67–93. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
- Eck, J.E., and T.D. Madensen. 2015. Meaningfully and artfully reinterpreting crime for useful science: An essay on the value of building with simple theory. In The Criminal Act: The role and influence of routine activity theory, ed. M.A. Andresen, and G. Farrell, 5–18. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ekblom, P. 2005. Designing products against crime. In Handbook of crime prevention and community safety, ed. N. Tilley, 203–244. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
- ENISA. 2009. ATM crime: Overview of the European situation and golden rules on how to avoid it. Heraklion: European Network and Information Security Agency.Google Scholar
- Europol. 2012. Payment card fraud in the European Union: Perspective of law enforcement agencies. The Hague: Europol.Google Scholar
- Farrell, G., and K. Pease. 2008. Repeat victimisation. In Environmental criminology and crime analysis, ed. R. Wortley, and L. Mazerolle, 117–135. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
- Felson, M. 1986. Linking criminal choices, routine activities, informal control, and criminal outcomes. In The Reasoning Criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending, ed. D.B. Cornish, and R.V. Clarke, 119-128. Secaucus, NJ: Springer.Google Scholar
- ISO. 2011. Personal identification number (PIN) management and security—Part 1, vol. 1, ISO Standard No. 9564-1:2011. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S.D., K.J. Bowers, L. Gamman, L. Mamerow, and A. Warne. 2010. Theft of customers’ personal property in cafés and bars (No. 60). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Kosse, A. 2013. The safety of cash and debit cards: A study on the perception and behaviour of Dutch consumers. International Journal of Central Banking 9 (4): 77–98.Google Scholar
- Mott, G., and A. Townsend. 2010. About the ATM industry, 2nd ed. unknown: ATM Security Working Group.Google Scholar
- Newman, O. 1972. Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- PCISSC. 2013. Information supplement: ATM security guidelines. Wakefield, MA: Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council. Retrieved from https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/pdfs/PCI_ATM_Security_Guidelines_Info_Supplement.pdf.
- Pease, K. 2006. No through road: Closing pathways to crime. In Crime reduction and the law, ed. K. Moss, and M. Stephens, 50–66. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sakharova, I., and L. Khan. 2011. Payment card fraud: Challenges and solutions (No. 34-11). Dallas: University of Texas at Dallas.Google Scholar