Skip to main content
Log in

Political Theory with an Ethnographic Sensibility

Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerly, B.A. (2000) Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerly, B.A. (2008) Universal Human Rights in a World of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerly, B.A. (2018) Just Responsibility: A Human Rights Theory of Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerly, B.A. and Attanasi, K. (2009) Global feminisms: Theory and ethics for studying gendered injustice. New Political Science 31(4): 543–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arneil, B. (1994). Trade, plantations, and property: John Locke and the economic defense of colonialism. Journal of the History of Ideas 54: 591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asad. T. (1975). Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad. T. (2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. California: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. and Jackson Cooke, M. (1935) The Bronx Slave Market. Crisis 42: 330–331, 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargu, B. (2014) Starve and Immolate: The Politics of Human Weapons. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1986) Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. P. Demetz (ed.). New York: Schocken.

  • Blajer de la Garza, Y. (2019) Leaving your car with strangers: Informal car parkers and improbable trust in Mexico City. Politics & Society, 47(3): 361–394.

  • Cabrera, L. (2010) The Practice of Global Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. (2003) Facts and principles. Philosophy & Public Affairs 31(3): 211–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. (2008) Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.H. [1990] (1991) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, G. and Betasamosake Simpson, L. (2016) Grounded normativity/place-based solidarity. American Quarterly 68(2): 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzaglio, I. (forthcoming) Can realism save us from populism? Rousseau in the digital age. European Journal of Political Theory (online first).

  • Dotson, K. (2014) Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology 28(2): 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W.E.B. (1939) The Souls of Black Folks. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1969) The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (ed). (2015) At the Heart of the State: The Moral World of Institutions. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flikschuh, K. and Ypi, L. (eds). (2014) Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Forman, F. (2018) Social norms and the cross-border citizen: From Adam Smith to Antanas Mockus. In C. Tognato (ed.) Cultural Agents Reloaded: The Legacy of Antanas Mockus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 333–356.

  • Forster, E.M. (2005) Aspects of the Novel. London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getachew, A. (2019) Worldmaking After Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2005) Outside Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2010) Politics and the Imagination.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, G. (2011) Political philosophy and the dead hand of its history. In J. Floyd and M. Stears (eds.) Political Philosophy Versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. (2018) Integrity in democratic politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20(2): 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampsher-Monk, I. (2001) The political history of thought. In D. Castiglione and I. Hampsher-Monk (eds.) The History of Political Thought in National Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, L. (2018) Reclaiming the System: Moral Responsibility, Divided Labour, and the Role of Organizations in Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, L. and Zacka, B. (2019) Fieldwork in political theory: Five arguments for an ethnographic sensibility. British Journal of Political Science 49(2): 763–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (2013) Conceptual universalization in the transnational nineteenth century. In S. Moyn and A. Sartori (eds.) Global Intellectual History. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqtidar, H. and Piliavsky, A. (2019) Worlding political theory: For an ethnographic political theory. Paper presented at New Methods in Political Theory Conference, London School of Economics and Politics.

  • Iqtidar, H. (2011) Secularizing Islamists? Jama’at-e-Islami and Jama’at-ud-D’awa in Urban Pakistan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iqtidar, H. (2016) Redefining ‘tradition’ in political thought. European Journal of Political Theory 15: 424–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqtidar, H. (2017) How long is life? Neoliberalism and Islamic Piety. Critical Inquiry 43(4): 790–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, P. (1985) Political thought as traditionary action: The critical response to Skinner and Pocock. History and Theory 24: 115–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.F., Burns, M. and Porth, K. (2017) A question of respect: A qualitative text analysis of the Canadian Parliamentary Committee Hearings on the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act. Canadian Journal of Political Science 50(4): 921–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jubb, R. (2019) Disaggregating political authority: What’s wrong with Rawlsian civil disobedience. Political Studies 67(4): 955–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. and Maynor, J. (eds.). (2008) Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1973) Anthropology and colonialism. Current Anthropology 14(5): 581–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo, M. (2018) The Politics of Borders: Sovereignty, Security, and the Citizen after 9/11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo, M. and Zacka, B. (2019) Political theory in an ethnographic key. American Political Science Review 113(4): 1066–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurhmann, T.M. (2010) Down and out in Chicago. Raritan 29(3): 140–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. (2004) Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1980) Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, U. (1999) Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Memmi, A. (1965) The Colonizer and the Colonized. New York: Orion Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2013) Justice for Earthlings. Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. (2008) Racial liberalism. PMLA 123(5): 1380–1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthu, S. (2003) Enlightenment Against Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S.M. (1989) Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Philp, M. (2018a) Politics and the ‘Pure of Heart’: Realism and corruption. In M. Sleat (ed.) Politics Recovered: Realist Thought in Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 194–217.

  • Philp, M. (2018b) The corruption of politics. Social Philosophy and Policy 35(2): 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J. (2010) Political theory of empire and imperialism. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 211–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. (2008) Cohen to the rescue! Ratio 21(4): 454–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. (2020) Realism in political theory, ethnographic sensibility, and the moral agency of bureaucrats. Polity 52(1): 64–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, J.C. (2015) Between Samaritans and States: The Political Ethics of Humanitarian INGOS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, P. (2016) From scepticism to liberalism: Bernard williams, the foundations of liberalism, and political realism. Political Studies 64(2): 368–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, P. (2018) Legitimacy and domination. In M. Sleat (ed.) Politics Recovered: Realist Thought in Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 114–139.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, E. (ed). (2009) Ethnographic immersion and the study of politics. In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Schwartz-Shea, P. and Majic, S. (2017) Introduction to symposium on ethnography and participant observation: Political Science Research in this ‘Late Methodological Moment’. PS: Political Science & Politics 50(1): 97–102.

  • Sagar, P. (2018) The Opinion of Mankind: Sociability and the Theory of the State from Hobbes to Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (2004) Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I. (2002) Problems, methods and theories in the study of politics, or what’s wrong with political science and what to do about it. Political Theory 30(4): 596–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L. (2006) Strange Harvest: Organ Transplants, Denatured Bodies, and the Transformed Self. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1998) Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2010) Visions of Politics: Volume 1, Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sleat, M. and Rossi, E. (2014) Realism in normative political theory. Philosophy Compass 9(10): 689–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G.C. (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 271–313.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. (1831) Religion and the Pure Principles of Morality, the Sure Foundation on Which We Must Build. On file with the author.

  • Thomas, M. (2010) Orientalism and comparative political theory. The Review of Politics 72(4): 653–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillyris, D. (2019) Political realism and dirty hands: Value pluralism, moral conflict and public ethics. Philosophia 47(5): 1579–1602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. (2001) [1841] Essay on Algeria. In Edited and translated by J. Pitts, Writings on Empire and Slavery. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 59–116.

  • Tully, J. (1994) Rediscovering America: The two treatises and aboriginal rights. In G.AJ. Rogers (ed.) Locke’s Philosophy: Content and Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Waldron, J. (2013) Political political theory: An inaugural lecture. Journal of Political Philosophy 21(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedeen, L. (1990) Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, I.B. (1897) Southern Horrors: Lynch Laws in All Phases. https://archive.org/details/southernhorrors14975gut.

  • Wolff, J. (2019) Method in philosophy and public policy: Applied philosophy versus engaged philosophy. In A. Lever and A. Poama (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2005) In the Beginning was the Deed. G. Hawthorn (ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P. (eds.). (2006) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. London: M.E. Sharpe.

  • Zacka, B. (2017) When the State Meets the Street: Public Service and Moral Agency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For invaluable discussion of these issues, the editor, Bernardo Zacka, would like to thank the contributors to this Critical Exchange, the participants and organizers of the Workshop in New Methods in Political theory held at the London School of Economics in May 2019, the panelists and audience for an APSA Panel on Ethnography and Political Theory held in Washington D.C. in August 2019, the Critical Exchange editor for the journal, Mihaela Mihai, as well as Lisa Herzog, Janosch Prinz, and Valentina Pugliano.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernardo Zacka.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zacka, B., Ackerly, B., Elster, J. et al. Political Theory with an Ethnographic Sensibility. Contemp Polit Theory 20, 385–418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00433-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00433-1

Navigation