Levinas and the question of politics

  • Robert FroeseEmail author


Recent political critiques and appropriations of Emmanuel Levinas’ work demonstrate the need to fundamentally re-evaluate the meaning and status of his philosophy. Both the Marxist critiques (often apropos Lacan) and ‘third wave’ applications interpret Levinas’ singular and unique relation to others—a bond which prohibits even the slightest trace of historical, hermeneutic, or political context—as the greatest obstacle to a Levinasian politics. From this standpoint, Levinas offers little more than a hyperbolic ethics that, at best, ignores, and, at worst, provides philosophical cover for, the political status quo (often defined by capitalism, imperialism, and Eurocentrism). To counter this established link between Levinas’ philosophy and his potential for political thought, this article reexamines the significance of the decontextualized social relation. I argue that such interpretations misapprehend the intended analytical depth of Levinas’ thought, which, in turn, misconstrue the relationship between Levinas and more traditional social ontologies. As a consequence, Levinas’ valuable normative import for political theory is obscured. By shifting our perspective, we can understand Levinas as articulating a philosophy of political utopianism well-suited to the challenges we face in our present conjuncture.


Emmanuel Levinas intersubjectivity political theory third wave continental philosophy 



  1. Althusser, L. (1971) ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation)’. In: Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  2. Atterton, P. and Calarco, M. (2010) Editors introduction. In: P. Atterton and M. Calarco (eds.) Radicalizing Levinas (pp. ix–xvii). Albany, NY: State University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Badiou. A. (2001) Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, translated by P. Hallward. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Bernasconi, R. (2005) Who is my neighbour? Who is the other?: Questioning ‘the generosity of Western thought’? In: C. Katz and L. Trout (eds.) Emmanuel Levinas: Critical Assessments by Leading Philosophers Volume IV: Beyond Levinas (pp. 5–30). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Caygill, H. (2002) Levinas and the Political. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Critchley, S. (2004) Five problems in Levinas’s view of politics and the sketch of a solution to them. Political Theory 32(2): 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. (1978) Violence and Metaphysics. In: Writing and Difference, translated by A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 97–192.Google Scholar
  8. Draninski, J.E. (2011) Levinas and the Postcolonial: Race, Nation, Other. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dussel, E. (1985) Philosophy of Liberation, translated by A. Martinez and Morkovosky. Maryknoll and New York: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  10. Eagleton, T. (2009) Trouble with Strangers: A Study of Ethics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Fichte, J.G. (2008) Address to the German Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hallward, P. (2003) Badiou: A Subject to Truth. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. (1978) Letter on humanism. In: D.F. Krell (ed.) Basic Writings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. (2008) Being and Time, translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York: Harper Perennial/Modern Thought.Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, M. (2013) ‘Language’. In: Poetry, Language, Thought, translated by A. Hofstadter. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  16. Levinas, E. (1969) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, translated by A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Levinas, E. (1981) Otherwise than Being: Or Beyond Essence, translated by A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Levinas, E. (1987) ‘Meaning and Sense’. In: Collected Philosophical Papers, translated by A. Lingis. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Levinas, E. (1990) ‘Reflections on the Philosophy of Hitlerism’. Critical Inquiry 17:1 (Autumn), pp. 62–71.Google Scholar
  20. Levinas, E. (1998) Philosophy, Justice, Love. In: Entre Nous: Thinking of the Other, translated by M. Smith and B. Harshav. Columbia University Press, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar
  21. Malabou, C. (2010) Plasticity at the Dusk of Writing, translated by C. Shread. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Reinhard, K. (2005) Towards a political theology of the neighbor. The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political Theology (pp. 11–75). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ricoeur, P. (2008) Oneself as Another. Chicago: Chicago of University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rothenburg, M.A. (2010) The Excessive Subject: A New Theory of Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sartre, J.P. (1975) Between Existentialism and Marxism. translated by John Mathews. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  26. Wolin, R. (2005) Levinas and heidegger: The anxiety of influence. The Frankfurt School Revisited, and Other Essays on Politics and Society (pp. 111–132). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Wood, D. (2005) Some questions for my Levinasian friends. In: E. Nelson, A. Kapust and K. Still (eds.) Addressing Levinas. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Žižek, S. (2005) Neighbors and other monsters: A plea for ethical violence. The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political Theology (pp. 134–190). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations