The effects of regional attachment on ideological self-placement: a comparative approach

  • Carol Galais
  • Ivan SerranoEmail author
Original Article


The capacity of the left–right scale to summarize most political issues can be challenged by the salience of the center–periphery cleavage. However, the existing literature does not agree on whether both attitudinal dimensions are related and, if so, to what extent. In this paper, we argue that both axes can have a dependency relationship, going from the latter to the former. Our main argument is that individuals with a strong regional attachment will assume a more progressive stance on the left–right axis regardless of their positions on the economic and cultural issues, and that this relationship is reinforced by contextual characteristics of the region such as internal homogeneity and external distinctiveness. We test our arguments by using the survey data from the Making Electoral Democracy Work project, which has data for 11 regions in 5 different countries.


Ideology Territorial attachment Regions Center–periphery 



  1. Abdelal, R., Y.M. Herrera, A.I. Johnston, and R. McDermott (eds.). 2009. Measuring identity: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., E. Spolaore, and R. Wacziarg. 2005. Trade, growth and the size of countries. In Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 1, Part B, ed. P. Aghion and S. Durlauf, 1499–1542. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
  3. Alonso, S., L. Cabeza, and B. Gómez. 2017. Disentangling peripheral parties’ issue packages in subnational elections. Comparative European Politics 15 (2): 240–263. Scholar
  4. Alvarez, B., M. Portos, and J. Vourdas. 2017. Waving goodbye? The determinants of autonomism and secessionism in Western Europe. Regional Studies. Scholar
  5. Alwin, D.F., and J.A. Krosnick. 1991. Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology 97 (1): 169–195.Google Scholar
  6. Amat, F. 2012. Party competition and preferences for inter-regional redistribution in Spain. South European Society and Politics 17 (3): 449–465. Scholar
  7. Ansell, B., and J. Lindvall. 2013. The political origins of primary education systems: Ideology, institutions, and interdenominational conflict in an era of nation-building. American Political Science Review 107 (3): 505–522.Google Scholar
  8. Balcells, L., J. Fernández-Albertos, and A. Kuo. 2015. Preferences for inter-regional redistribution. Comparative Political Studies 48 (10): 1318–1351.Google Scholar
  9. Bartolini, S., and P. Mair. 2007. Identity, competition and electoral availability: the stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–1985. Essex: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bem, D.J. 1970. Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs. Oxford: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  11. Beramendi, P. 2012. The political geography of inequality: Regions and redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Blais, A. 2010. Making electoral democracy work. Electoral Studies 29 (1): 169–170. Scholar
  13. Blais, A., and C. Galais. 2016. Measuring the civic duty to vote: A proposal. Electoral Studies 41: 60–69.Google Scholar
  14. Bolton, P., and G. Roland. 1997. The breakup of nations: A political economy analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4): 1057–1090.Google Scholar
  15. Brancati, D. 2008. The origins and strengths of regional parties. British Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 135–159. Scholar
  16. Bryan, M.L., and S.P. Jenkins. 2016. Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review 32 (1): 3–22. Scholar
  17. Calhoun, C. 1993. Nationalism and ethnicity. Annual Review of Sociology 19: 211–239.Google Scholar
  18. Canovan, M. 1996. Nationhood and political theory. London: Edward Elgar Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  19. Chandra, K. 2011. What is an ethnic party? Party Politics 17 (2): 151–169.Google Scholar
  20. Costa-Font, J., and F. Cowell. 2015. Social identity and redistributive preferences: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 29 (2): 357–374. Scholar
  21. De Vries, C.E., A. Hakhverdian, and B. Lancee. 2013. The dynamics of voters’ left/right identification: The role of economic and cultural attitudes. Political Science Research and Methods 1 (2): 223–238.Google Scholar
  22. De Winter, L., and H. Tursan. 2004. Regionalist parties in western Europe. Basingstoke: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Devine, D.J. 1972. The political culture of the United States: The influence of member values on regime maintenance. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  24. Deiwiks, C., L.-E. Cederman, and K.S. Gleditsch. 2012. Inequality and conflict in federations. Journal of Peace Research 49 (2): 289–304. Scholar
  25. Dinas, E. 2012. Left and right in the Basque Country and Catalonia: The meaning of ideology in a nationalist context. South European Society and Politics 17 (3): 467–485. Scholar
  26. Duckitt, J., and C.G. Sibley. 2007. Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality 21 (2): 113–130.Google Scholar
  27. Ehman, L.H. 1980. Change in high school students’ political attitudes as a function of social studies classroom climate. American Educational Research Journal 17 (2): 253–265.Google Scholar
  28. Evans, G., A. Heath, and M. Lalljee. 1996. Measuring left-right and libertarian-authoritarian values in the British electorate. British Journal of Sociology 47 (1): 93–112.Google Scholar
  29. Evans, J., and J. Tonge. 2009. Social class and party choice in Northern Ireland’s ethnic blocs. West European Politics 32 (5): 1012–1030. Scholar
  30. Fearon, J. D., & Van Houten, P. (2002). The politicization of cultural and economic difference. In Fifth meeting of the Laboratory in Comparative Ethnic Processes, Stanford University. Retrieved from
  31. Fearon, J.D., K. Kasara, and D.D. Laitin. 2007. Ethnic minority rule and civil war onset. American Political Science Review 101 (1): 187–193. Scholar
  32. Feldman, S. 1988. Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 416–440. Scholar
  33. Feldman, S., and C. Johnston. 2014. Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology 35 (3): 337–358.Google Scholar
  34. Finseraas, H. 2012. Poverty, ethnic minorities among the poor, and preferences for redistribution in European regions. Journal of European Social Policy 22 (2): 164–180. Scholar
  35. Gomez, M., L. De Winter, and P. Lynch. 2006. Autonomist Parties in Europe: Identity Politics and the Revival of the Territorial Cleavage. Barcelona: ICPS.Google Scholar
  36. Gourevitch, P.A. 1979. The reemergence of «peripheral nationalisms»: Some comparative speculations on the spatial distribution of political leadership and economic growth. Comparative Studies in Society and History 21 (3): 303–322. Scholar
  37. Grendstad, G. 2003. Comparing political orientations: Grid-group theory versus the left-right dimension in the five Nordic countries. European Journal of Political Research 42 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
  38. Guinjoan, M., and T. Rodon. 2015. A scrutiny of the Linz-Moreno question. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 46 (1): 128–142.Google Scholar
  39. Heath, A. 1986. Do people have consistent attitudes. In British social attitudes: The 1986 report, ed. R. Jowel, S. Witherspoon, and L. Brook, 1–15. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  40. Hechter, M. 1992. The dynamics of secession. Acta Sociologica 35 (4): 267–283. Scholar
  41. Himmelweit, H., P. Humphreys, and M. Jaeger. 1985. How voters decide: A model of vote choice based on a special longitudinal study extending over fifteen years and the British Election Surveys of 1970–1983. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and C.J. Wilson. 2002. Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 965–989.Google Scholar
  43. Horowitz, D.L. 1981. Patterns of ethnic separatism. Comparative Studies in Society and History 23 (2): 165–195. Scholar
  44. Jost, J.T., M.R. Banaji, and B.A. Nosek. 2004. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political psychology 25 (6): 881–919.Google Scholar
  45. Jost, J.T., B.A. Nosek, and S.D. Gosling. 2008. Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (2): 126–136. Scholar
  46. Keating, M. 1996. Nations against the state: the new politics of nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Kitschelt, H., and S. Hellemans. 1990. The left-right semantics and the new politics cleavage. Comparative Political Studies 23 (2): 210–238.Google Scholar
  48. Knutsen, O. 1995. Value orientations, political conflicts and left-right identification: A comparative study. European Journal of Political Research 28 (1): 63–93.Google Scholar
  49. Kuklinski, J.H., and P.J. Quirk. 2000. Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. In Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality, ed. Lupia Arthur, M.D. McCubbins, and S.L. Popkin, 153–182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Levendusky, M. 2009. The partisan sort: how liberals became democrats and conservatives became republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Luttbeg, N.R., and M.M. Gant. 1985. The failure of liberal/conservative ideology as a cognitive structure. Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (1): 80–93.Google Scholar
  52. Marks, G., L. Hooghe, M. Nelson, and E. Edwards. 2006. Party competition and European integration in the east and west different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies 39 (2): 155–175.Google Scholar
  53. Mason, L. 2015. “I disrespectfully agree”: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–145.Google Scholar
  54. Maas, C. J. M., and J. J. Hox. 2005. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology 1 (3): 86–92.Google Scholar
  55. Massetti, E. 2009. Explaining regionalist party positioning in a multi-dimensional ideological space: A framework for analysis. Regional & Federal Studies 19 (4–5): 501–531.Google Scholar
  56. Massetti, E., and A.H. Schakel. 2015. From class to region. How regionalist parties link (and subsume) left-right into centre-periphery politics. Party Politics 21 (6): 866–886. Scholar
  57. Massetti, E., and A.H. Schakel. 2016. Between autonomy and secession: Decentralization and regionalist party ideological radicalism. Party Politics 22 (1): 59–79. Scholar
  58. McClosky, H., and J. Zaller. 1984. The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. McEwen, N. 2006. Nationalism and the state: welfare and identity in Scotland and Quebec. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  60. McNeish, D.M., and L.M. Stapleton. 2016. The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review 28 (2): 295–314. Scholar
  61. Medeiros, M., J.-P. Gauvin, and C. Chhim. 2015. Refining vote choice in an ethno-regionalist context: Three-dimensional ideological voting in Catalonia and Quebec. Electoral Studies 40: 14–22. Scholar
  62. Mendelsohn, M. 2002. Measuring national identity and patterns of attachment: Quebec and nationalist mobilization. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 8 (3): 72–94. Scholar
  63. Miller, D. 2000. Citizenship and national identity. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  64. Miller, D., and S. Ali. 2014. Testing the national identity argument. European Political Science Review 6 (2): 237–259. Scholar
  65. Newman, S. 1997. Ideological trends among ethnoregional parties in post-industrial democracies. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 3 (1): 28–60.Google Scholar
  66. Pinard, M., and R. Hamilton. 1977. The independence issue and the polarization of the electorate: The 1973 Quebec election. Canadian Journal of Political Science 10 (02): 215–260.Google Scholar
  67. Rico, G., and M.K. Jennings. 2016. The formation of left-right identification: Pathways and correlates of parental influence. Political Psychology 37 (2): 237–252. Scholar
  68. Robinson, J.P., and J.A. Fleishman. 1988. A report: Ideological identification: Trends and interpretations of the liberal-conservative balance. The Public Opinion Quarterly 52 (1): 134–145.Google Scholar
  69. Rokkan, S., P. Flora, S. Kuhnle, and D.W. Urwin. 1999. State formation, nation-building, and mass politics in Europe: The theory of Stein Rokkan: Based on his collected works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rovny, J., & Polk, J. (2013). The other dimension. Cergus’s working paper series, 3. Retrieved from
  71. Selway, J.S. 2011. Cross-cuttingness, cleavage structures and civil war onset. British Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 111–138. Scholar
  72. Schakel, A., and C. Jeffery. 2013. Are regional elections really ‘second-order’ elections? Regional Studies 47 (3): 323–341. Scholar
  73. Searing, D., G. Wright, and G. Rabinowitz. 1976. The primacy principle: attitude change and political socialization. British Journal of Political Science 6 (1): 83–113.Google Scholar
  74. Serrano, I., and A. Bonillo. 2017. Boundary shifts and vote alignment in Catalonia. Ethnicities 17 (3): 371–391.Google Scholar
  75. Siroky, D., Mueller, S., & Hechter, M. (2014). Religious legacies, political preferences and intergroup bargaining: The case of Jura. APSA 2014 annual meeting paper. Retrieved from
  76. Smith, A.D. 1979. Towards a theory of ethnic separatism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 2 (1): 21–37.Google Scholar
  77. Sorens, J. 2005. The cross-sectional determinants of secessionism in advanced democracies. Comparative Political Studies 38 (3): 304–326.Google Scholar
  78. Sorens, J. 2009. The partisan logic of decentralization in Europe. Regional and Federal Studies. 19 (2): 255–272.Google Scholar
  79. Strijbis, O., and R. Leonisio. 2012. Political cleavages in the Basque Country: Meaning and salience. Regional and Federal Studies 22 (5): 595–611.Google Scholar
  80. Tajfel, H., M.G. Billig, R.P. Bundy, and C. Flament. 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology 1 (2): 149–178.Google Scholar
  81. Thorisdottir, H., J.T. Jost, I. Liviatan, and P.E. Shrout. 2007. Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (2): 175–203.Google Scholar
  82. Van Deth, J.W., S. Abendschön, and M. Vollmar. 2011. Children and politics: An empirical reassessment of early political socialization. Political Psychology 32 (1): 147–174.Google Scholar
  83. Verba, S., and G. Almond. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  85. Zariski, R. 1989. Ethnic extremism among ethnoterritorial minorities in western Europe: dimensions, causes, and institutional responses. Comparative Politics 21 (3): 253–272.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Public Law and Political Science DepartmentUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Open University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations