Advertisement

Turning out but not voting: invalid ballots in post-communist parliamentary elections

  • Jakub LysekEmail author
  • Tomáš Lebeda
  • Karel Kouba
Original Article

Abstract

Large numbers of invalid votes in elections can present a threat to the legitimacy of democratic systems. Focusing on the post-communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe, three theoretical models explaining the incidence of invalid votes are tested using aggregated data from all legislative elections. While the protest behavior powerfully shapes the incidence of invalid votes in less democratic countries, complex electoral systems and concurrent elections are also associated with high levels of invalid voting (indicating voters’ error). Conversely, we find that most socioeconomic variables are weak predictors of invalid voting while controlling for institutional and political variables in the region. The study has policy implications that the simple electoral design should be preferred.

Keywords

Invalid voting Parliamentary elections Post-communist politics Electoral behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their thanks to the editors and two anonymous reviewers of this article as well as to the panel participants at the ECPR General Conference in Prague for valuable suggestions. Jakub Lysek and Tomáš Lebeda gratefully acknowledge support of the research grant (no. GA13-30062S) of the Philosophical Faculty of the Palacky University Olomouc. Karel Kouba was supported by Internal grant competition of the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Hradec Králové.

References

  1. Ackaert, J., B. Wauters and D. Verlet. 2011. Turnout at Local Elections: The Relevance of Contextual Variables. Paper presented at Politicologenetmaal, Amsterdam. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2134778. 9–10 June.
  2. Aldashev, G., and G. Mastrobuoni. 2013. Invalid Ballots and Electoral Competition. Carlo Alberto Notebooks 153: 1–39.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, N., and J.N. Katz. 1995. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 89: 634–647.Google Scholar
  4. Birch, S. 2010. Ukraine. In 2010 Elections in Europe: a Data Handbook, ed. D. Nohlen and P. Stöver, 1967–2000. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  5. Blais, A., and A. Dobrzynska. 1998. Turnout in Electoral Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 33(2): 239–261.Google Scholar
  6. Brambor, T., W.R. Clark, and M. Golder. 2006. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, M., and E.M. Uslaner. 2002. Inequality, Trust, and Political Engagement. Boston: Paper Presented at APSA.Google Scholar
  8. Brug, W., C. EijK, and M. Franklin. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carman, Ch., J. Mitchell, and R. Johns. 2008. The Unfortunate Natural Experiment in Ballot Design: The Scottish Parliamentary Elections of 2007. Electoral Studies 27(3): 442–459.Google Scholar
  10. Christensen, H.S. 2016. All the Same? Examining the Link Between Three Kinds of Political Dissatisfaction and Protest. Comparative European Politics 14(6): 781–801.Google Scholar
  11. Cisneros, G.Y. 2009. Movilización, escolaridad y voto nulo. La elección federal de 2009 en México. Política y Gobierno 20(1): 39–78.Google Scholar
  12. Cisneros, G.Y., and M. Freigedo. 2014. Protesta o cambio institucional? Determinantes del voto nulo y blanco en las elecciones departamentales de 2010 en Uruguay en perspectiva comparada. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Municipales 8: 241–274.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, W.R., and M. Golder. 2006. Rehabilitating Duverger’s Theory Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws. Comparative Politicial Studies 39(6): 679–708.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, M.J. 2017. Protesting via the Null Ballot: An Assessment of the Decision to Cast an Invalid Vote in Latin America. Political Behavior 40: 395–414.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, M.J. 2018. A Dynamic Model of the Invalid Vote: How a Changing Candidate Menu Shapes Null Voting Behavior. Electoral Studies 53: 111–121.Google Scholar
  16. Dalton, R.J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices—The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dejaeghere, Y., and B. Vanhoutte. 2016. Virtuous Villages and Sinful Cities? A Spatial Analysis of the Effects of Community Characteristics on Turnout and Blank/Invalid Voting in Local Elections in Belgium 2006–2012. Acta Politica 51(1): 80–101.Google Scholar
  18. De Paola, M., and V. Scoppa. 2014. The Impact of Closeness of Electoral Participation Exploiting the Italian Double Ballot System. Public Choice 160(3–4): 467–479.Google Scholar
  19. Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  20. Driscoll, A., and M.J. Nelson. 2014. Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments. Political Research Quarterly 67(3): 547–561.Google Scholar
  21. Fatke, M., and T. Heinsohn. 2016. Invalid Voting in German Constituencies. German Politics 26: 273–291.Google Scholar
  22. Fornos, C.A., T.J. Power, and J.C. Garand. 2004. Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000. Comparative Political Studies 37(8): 909–940.Google Scholar
  23. Galatas, S. 2008. “None of the Above?” Casting Blank Ballots in Ontario Provincial Elections. Politics and Policy 36(3): 448–473.Google Scholar
  24. Gallagher, M. 1991. Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems. Electoral Studies 10: 33–51.Google Scholar
  25. Gendźwiłł, A. 2015. Skąd się biorą głosy nieważne w wyborach do sejmików województw? Studia Socjologiczne 4(219): 33–57.Google Scholar
  26. Geys, B. 2006. Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research. Electoral Studies 25(4): 637–663.Google Scholar
  27. Greene, W.H. 2014. Econometric Analysis. London: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  28. Herrnson, P.S., M.J. Hanmer, and R.G. Niemi. 2012. The Impact of Ballot Type on Voter Errors. American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 716–730.Google Scholar
  29. Herron, E.S. 2011. Measuring Dissent in Electoral Authoritarian Societies: Lessons from Azerbaijan’s 2008 Presidential Election and 2009 Referendum. Comparative Political Studies 44(11): 1557–1583.Google Scholar
  30. Herron, M.C., and J.S. Sekhon. 2005. Black Candidates and Black Voters: Assessing the Impact of Candidate Race on Uncounted Vote Rates. The Journal of Politics 67(1): 154–177.Google Scholar
  31. Hirczy, W. 1994. The Impact of Mandatory Voting Laws on Turnout: A Quasi-Experimental Approach. Electoral Studies 13(1): 64–76.Google Scholar
  32. Hooghe, M., S. Mariën, and T. Pauwels. 2011. Where Do Distrusting Voters Turn if There is No Viable Exit or Voice Option? The Impact of Political Trust on Electoral Behaviour in the Belgian Regional Elections of June 2009. Government and Opposition 46(2): 245–273.Google Scholar
  33. Hutcheson, D.S. 2004. Disengaged or Disenchanted? The Vote ‘Against All’ in Post-Communist Russia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20(1): 98–121.Google Scholar
  34. Jackman, R.W. 1987. Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. The American Political Science Review 81(2): 405–424.Google Scholar
  35. Kam, C.D., and R.J. Franzese Jr. 2007. Modelling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  36. Katz, G., and I. Levin. 2016. A General Model of Abstention Under Compulsory Voting. Political Science Research and Methods 6(3): 489–508.Google Scholar
  37. Kimball, D.C., and M. Kropf. 2005. Ballot Design and Unrecorded Votes on Paper-Based Ballots. Public Opinion Quarterly 69(4): 508–529.Google Scholar
  38. Kostadinova, T. 2003. Voter Turnout Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe. European Journal of Political Research 42(6): 741–759.Google Scholar
  39. Kouba, K., and J. Lysek. 2016. Institutional Determinants of Invalid Voting in Post-Communist Europe and Latin America. Electoral Studies 41: 92–104.Google Scholar
  40. Kouba, K., and J. Lysek. 2019. What Affects Invalid Voting? A Review and Meta-Analysis. Government and Opposition.  https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.33.Google Scholar
  41. Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12(1): 3–27.Google Scholar
  42. Martinez i Coma, F., and A. Werner. 2019. Compulsory Voting and Ethnic Diversity Increase Invalid Voting While Corruption Does Not: An Analysis of 417 Parliamentary Elections in 73 Countries. Democratization 26(2): 288–308.Google Scholar
  43. McAllister, I., and T. Makkai. 1993. Institutions, Society or Protest? Explaining Invalid Votes in Australian Elections. Electoral Studies 12(1): 23–40.Google Scholar
  44. McAllister, I., and S. White. 2008. Voting ‘Against All’ in Postcommunist Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 60(1): 67–87.Google Scholar
  45. Moral, M. 2016. The Passive-Aggressive Voter: The Calculus of Casting an Invalid Vote in European Democracies. Political Research Quarterly 69(4): 1–14.Google Scholar
  46. Mott, R.L. 1926. Invalid Ballots Under the Hare System of Proportional Representation. The American Political Science Review 20(4): 874–882.Google Scholar
  47. Nihuys, D. 2014. Mehr Stimmen gleich bessere demokratische Qualität? Negative Effekte der Komplexität des Wahlrechts auf die Zusammensetzung der Wählerschaft. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 24(3): 255–280.Google Scholar
  48. Obradović-Wochnik, J., and A. Wochnik. 2014. Invalid Ballots and the “Crisis of Representative Democracy”: Re-Inventing Protest at the 2012 Serbian Elections. East European Politics and Societies 28: 808–835.Google Scholar
  49. O’Dwyer, C. 2006. Runaway State-building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Oelbermann, K., A. Palomares, and F. Pukelsheim. 2010. The 2009 European Parliament Elections: From Votes to Seats in 27 Ways. European Electoral Studies 5(1): 148–182.Google Scholar
  51. Pachón, M., R. Carroll, and H. Barragán. 2017. Ballot Design and Invalid Votes: Evidence from Colombia. Electoral Studies 48: 98–110.Google Scholar
  52. Plümper, T., V.E. Troeger, and P. Manow. 2005. Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory. European Journal of Political Research 44(2): 327–354.Google Scholar
  53. Powell, G.B. 1986. American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review 80(1): 17–43.Google Scholar
  54. Power, T.J., and J.C. Garand. 2007. Determinants of Invalid Voting in Latin America. Electoral Studies 26(2): 432–444.Google Scholar
  55. Power, T.J., and J.T. Roberts. 1995. Compulsory Voting, Invalid Ballots, and Abstention in Brazil. Political Research Quarterly 48(4): 795–826.Google Scholar
  56. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  57. Reynolds, A., and M. Steenbergen. 2006. How the World Votes: The Political Consequences of Ballot Design. Innovation and Manipulation. Electoral Studies 25(3): 570–598.Google Scholar
  58. Riker, W.H., and P.C. Ordeshook. 1968. A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. American Political Science Review 62(1): 25–42.Google Scholar
  59. Rosenthal, H., and S. Sen. 1973. Electoral Participation in the French Fifth Republic. The American Political Science Review 67(1): 29–54.Google Scholar
  60. Rosenthal, M., H. Zubida, and D. Nachmias. 2018. Voting Locally Abstaining Nationally: Descriptive Representation, Substantive Representation and Minority Voters’ Turnout. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41(9): 1632–1650.Google Scholar
  61. Singh, S.P. 2017. Politically Unengaged, Disturbing, and Disaffected Individuals Drive the Link Between Compulsory Voting and Invalid Balloting. Political Science Research and Methods 7: 107–123.Google Scholar
  62. Simonovits, G. 2012. Competition and Turnout Revisited: The Importance of Measuring Expected Closeness Accurately. Electoral Studies 31: 365–371.Google Scholar
  63. Socia, K.M., and E.K. Brown. 2014. Up in Smoke: The Passage of Medical Marijuana Legislation and Enactment of Dispensary Moratoriums in Massachusetts. Crime and Delinquency 63(5): 569–591.Google Scholar
  64. Solvak, M., and K. Vassil. 2015. Indifference or Indignation? Explaining Purposive Vote Spoiling in Elections. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties 25(4): 463–481.Google Scholar
  65. Steifbold, R.P. 1965. The Significance of Void Ballots in West German Elections. American Political Science Review 59(2): 391–407.Google Scholar
  66. Stockemer, D. 2017. What Affects Voter Turnout? A Review Article/Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Research. Government and Opposition 52(4): 698–722.Google Scholar
  67. Superti, C. 2015. Comparing Individual Blank Voting, Mobilized Protest Voting, and Voting Abstention. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  68. Taylor, S.L. 2012. Colombian Voters and Ballot Structure: Error, Confusion, and/or ʻNone of the Aboveʼ. The Latin Americanist 56(4): 111–130.Google Scholar
  69. Uggla, F. 2008. Incompetence, Alienation, or Calculation? Explaining Levels of Invalid Ballots and Extra-Parliamentary Votes. Comparative Political Studies 41(8): 1141–1164.Google Scholar
  70. Wilson, S.E., and D.M. Butler. 2007. A Lot More to Do: The Sensitivity of Time-Series Cross-Section Analyses to Simple Alternative Specifications. Political Analysis 15(2): 101–123.Google Scholar
  71. Wooldridge, J.M. 2003. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, vol. 2. Mason, OH: Nelson Education.Google Scholar
  72. Young, S., and L. Hill. 2009. Uncounted Votes: Informal Voting in the House of Representatives as a Marker of Political Exclusion in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics and History 55(1): 64–79.Google Scholar
  73. Zulfikarpasic, A. 2001. Le vote blanc: Abstention civique ou expression politique? Revue Française de Science Politique 51(1–2): 247–268.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and European StudiesPalacky University in OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of PoliticsUniversity of Hradec KrálovéHradec KraloveCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations