Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 778–796 | Cite as

Europeanization without substance? EU–Turkey relations and gender equality in employment

  • Ayşe İdil AybarsEmail author
  • Paul Copeland
  • Dimitris Tsarouhas
Original Article

Abstract

This paper focuses on EU–Turkey relations through gender-related employment policy practices. We argue that Turkey is undergoing a process of ‘Europeanization without substance’, in which vague commitments and policy initiatives to enhance female labour force participation coexist uneasily with a contravening political discourse. This is not merely the result of a stalemate in accession negotiations, nor does it stem from the diversity of employment practices across the Union. It rather results from the deliberative discourses used by Turkey’s political leadership to selectively appropriate certain aspects of Europeanization to further a politically motivated agenda that, in essence, negates gender equality altogether. This, we argue in turn, is reflected in a set of practices, policy initiatives, and public statements that make substantive progress in EU–Turkey relations harder. This process is facilitated by the diminishing emphasis placed by the EU on gender equality in employment as manifested by the evolution of gender equality practices at EU level and reinforced by austerity-led policies during the economic crisis.

Keywords

EU–Turkey relations Gender equality Employment policy Europeanization Communicative discourse 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper stems from the 2015 Jean Monnet Workshop hosted by Dimitris Tsarouhas at Bilkent University and funded by the European Commission, Project No. 529070-LLP-1-2012-1-TR-AJM-CH.

References

  1. Arat, Y. 2010. Religion, Politics and Gender Equality in Turkey: Implications of a Democratic Paradox? Third World Quarterly 31(6): 869–884.Google Scholar
  2. Aybars, A.I., and D. Tsarouhas. 2010. Straddling Two Continents: Social Policy and Welfare Politics in Turkey. Social Policy & Administration 44(6): 746–763.Google Scholar
  3. Aydin-Düzgit, S., and A. Kaliber. 2016. Encounters with Europe in an Era of Domestic and International Turmoil: Is Turkey a de-Europeanising Candidate Country? South European Society and Politics 21(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  4. BBC Turkish. 2016. Erdoğan’dan AB’ye: Daha ileri giderseniz, sınır kapıları açılır (From Erdoğan to EU: If You Go Further, Border Gates Will be Opened). 25 November. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-38103319.
  5. Beveridge, F. 2012. ‘Going Soft?’ Analysing the Contribution of Soft and Hard Measures in EU Gender Law and Policy. In The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies: A Discursive-Sociological Approach, ed. E. Lombardo, and M. Forest. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Beveridge, F., and S. Velluti (eds.). 2008. Gender and the Open Method of Co-ordination: Perspectives on Law, Governance and Equality in the EU. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Bianet. 2006. Çubukçu Sonunda Kadın Örgütleriyle Görüştü (Çubukçu Finally Meets Women’s Organizations). 7 July. Available at: https://bianet.org/bianet/kadin/81798-cubukcu-sonunda-kadin-orgutleriyle-gorustu.
  8. Bianet. 2008a. Erdoğan: Kadınlar Doğurun: Türk Milletinin Kökünü Kazıyacaklar (Erdoğan: Women, Give Birth: They Will Exterminate the Turkish Nation’. 10 March. Available at: https://bianet.org/bianet/toplumsal-cinsiyet/105451-erdogan-kadinlar-dogurun-turk-milletinin-kokunu-kaziyacaklar.
  9. Bianet. 2008b. Bakan Çubukçu, Erdoğan’ın “Babalarımız Evin Direği” Sözünü Kınamadı, Savundu (Minister Çubukçu did not Criticize Erdoğan’s Statement “Our Fathers are the Head of Our Households”, She Defended it). 11 July. Available at: https://bianet.org/bianet/siyaset/108283-bakan-cubukcu-erdogan-in-babalarimiz-evin-diregi-sozunu-kinamadi-savundu.
  10. Bianet. 2009. Kadın Örgütleri Vekilleri Uyardı: Fırsat Değil, Eşitlik İstiyoruz (Women’s Organizations Warned MPs: We Want Equality, not Opportunity). 12 February. Available at: http://bianet.org/bianet/toplumsal-cinsiyet/112529-kadin-orgutleri-vekilleri-uyardi-firsat-degil-esitlik-istiyoruz.
  11. Bianet. 2011. Kadın Bakanlığı Kaldırıldı, Kadın Örgütleri Öfkeli (Ministry for Women Abolished, Women’s Organizations are Enraged). 8 June. Available at: http://bianet.org/bianet/kadin/130585-kadin-bakanligi-kaldirildi-kadin-orgutleri-ofkeli.
  12. Bianet. 2014. Kadın Örgütleri İstanbul Sözleşmesi Sürecinden Dışlanıyor (Women’s Organizations are Excluded from the Istanbul Convention Process). 22 December. Available at: http://bianet.org/bianet/kadin/161002-kadin-orgutleri-istanbul-sozlesmesi-surecinden-dislaniyor.
  13. Bolukbasi, H.T., and E. Ertugal. 2013. Europeanisation of Employment Policy in Turkey: Tracing Domestic Change Through Institutions, Ideas and Interests. South European Society and Politics 18(2): 337–357.Google Scholar
  14. Börzel, T. and D. Soyaltin. 2012. Europeanization in Turkey: Stretching a Concept to Its Limits? Working Paper Series, No.36, Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) “The Transformative Power of Europe” Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  15. Bugra, A. 2014. Revisiting the Wollstonecraft Dilemma in the Context of Conservative Liberalism: The Case of Female Employment in Turkey. Social Politics 21(1): 148–166.Google Scholar
  16. Bugra, A., and C. Keyder. 2006. The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation. Journal of European Social Policy 16(3): 211–228.Google Scholar
  17. Caporaso, J., and J. Jupille. 2001. The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policy and Domestic Structural Change. In Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, ed. M.G. Cowles, J. Caporaso, and T. Risse. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dedeoglu, S. 2012. Equality, Protection or Discrimination: Gender Equality Policies in Turkey. Social Politics 19(2): 269–290.Google Scholar
  19. Diez, T., A. Agnantopoulos, and A. Kaliber. 2005. Turkey, Europeanization and Civil Society. South European Society and Politics 10(1): 10–15.Google Scholar
  20. Dogan, Y.P. 2015. Activist: Government’s Family Package Encourages Motherhood, not Employment. Today’s Zaman. 16 March. Available at: http://www.todayszaman.com/monday-talk_activist-governments-family-package-encourages-motherhood-not-employment_375315.html.
  21. Eldem, T. 2013. The End of Turkey's Europeanization? Turkish Policy Quarterly 12(1): 125–135.Google Scholar
  22. Eurostat. 2017. Employment and Activity by Sex and AgeAnnual Data. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Accessed 31 March 2018
  23. Fagan, C., D. Grimshaw, and J. Rubery. 2006. The Subordination of the Gender Equality Objective: The National Reform Programmes and “Making Work Pay” Policies. Industrial Relations Journal 37(6): 571–592.Google Scholar
  24. Fougner, T., and A. Kurtoglu. 2015. Gender Policy: A Case of Instrumental Europeanization. In The Europeanization of Turkish Public Policies: A Scorecard, ed. A. Güney, and A. Tekin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Fowler, S. 2011. Women Still an Untapped Force in Turkey. New York Times. 4 May. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/world/middleeast/05iht-M05-WORK-WOMEN.html?_r=0.
  26. Galligan, Y., S. Clavero, and M. Calloni. 2007. Gender Politics and Democracy in Post-Socialist Europe. Leverkusen Opladan (Budrich).Google Scholar
  27. Gardner, D. 2013. Opinion: EU Shares Blame with Erdogan for Loss of Reform Zeal. Financial Times. 30 September. Available online at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/fb9f22ce-1eb1-11e3-b80b-00144feab7de.html#axzz3icIQUZDX.
  28. Gateva, E. 2015. European Union Enlargement Conditionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Gedik, E. 2015. Toplumsal Cinsiyet Ana Akımlaştırmanın Türkiye’de Kadın Hareketi Üzerindeki Etkisi Ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Adaleti Kavramı. Akademik Hassasiyetler 2(4): 209–228.Google Scholar
  30. Grabbe, H. 2002. European Union Conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire. International Political Science Review 23(3): 249–268.Google Scholar
  31. Gulmez, S.B. 2013. Explaining the Rise of Euroscepticism in the Turkish Political Elite. In Turkey and the European Union: Facing New Challenges and Opportunities, ed. F. Cengiz, and L. Hoffman, 102–120. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Gumuscu, S. 2013. The emerging Predominant Party System in Turkey. Government & Opposition 48(2): 223–244.Google Scholar
  33. Gunes Ayata, A., and F. Tutuncu. 2008. Party Politics of the AKP (2002–2007) and the Predicaments of Women at the Intersection of the Westernist, Islamist and Feminist Discourses in Turkey. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 35(3): 363–384.Google Scholar
  34. Hafner-Burton, E.M., and M.A. Pollack. 2000. Mainstreaming Gender in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 7: 432–456.Google Scholar
  35. Hay, C., and B. Rosamond. 2002. Globalization, European Integration and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives. Journal of European Public Policy 9(2): 147–167.Google Scholar
  36. Hughes, J., G. Sasse, and C. Gordon. 2004. Conditionality and Compliance in the EU’s Eastward Enlargement: Regional Policy and the Reform of sub-National Government. Journal of Common Market Studies 42(3): 523–551.Google Scholar
  37. Hurriyet. 2006. Erdoğan: İslam dünyasında kadın olması gereken yerde değil (Women are not in the Position they Deserve in the Islamic World). 8 November. Available at: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/erdogan-islam-dunyasinda-kadin-olmasi-gereken-yerde-degil-5398904.
  38. Hurriyet. 2008. Erdoğan: En az üç çocuk doğurun (Erdoğan: Have at least Three Children). 7 March. Available at: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/erdogan-en-az-uc-cocuk-dogurun-8401981.
  39. Jacquot, S. 2015. Transformations in EU Gender Equality: From Emergence to Dismantling. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Korkut, U., and H. Eslen-Ziya. 2011. The Impact of Conservative Discourses in Family Policies, Population Politics, and Gender Rights in Poland and Turkey. Social Politics 18(3): 387–418.Google Scholar
  41. Lombardo, E., and M. Forest (eds.). 2012. The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies: A Discursive-Sociological Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Lombardo, E., and M. Forest. 2015. The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies: A Discursive-Sociological Approach. Comparative European Politics 13(2): 222–239.Google Scholar
  43. MacMillan, C. 2013. Discourse, Identity and the Question of Turkey’s Accession to the EU: Through the Looking Glass. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. Masselot, A. 2007. The State of Gender Equality Law in the European Union. European Law Journal 13(2): 152–168.Google Scholar
  45. Milliyet. 2008. Başbakan Erdoğan: Biz bir aileyiz, kırgınlıklar olması doğal (Prime Minister Erdoğan: We are a Family, it is Natural to have Resentments). 16 May. Available at: http://www.milliyet.com.tr/basbakan-erdogan–biz-bir-aileyiz–kirginliklar-olmasi-dogal-siyaset-545122/.
  46. Milliyet. 2014. Kadın ile erkeği eşit konuma getiremezseniz çünkü o fıtrata terstir (You Cannot Bring Women and Men to the Same Position Because it Contradicts Creation). 24 November. Available at: http://www.milliyet.com.tr/erdogan-batsin-bu-dunya/siyaset/detay/1974189/default.htm.
  47. Munoz Boudet, A.M. and W. Wiseman. 2015. Turkey’s Important Balancing Act: Promoting Women’s Empowerment in Turkey. The Globalist, 9 April. Accessed on 5 July 2015 under http://www.theglobalist.com/turkeys-important-balancing-act/.
  48. NTV. 2010. Erdoğan: AB Hıristiyan Kulübü değilse… (Erdoğan: If the EU is not a Christian Club…). 12 June. Available at: http://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/erdogan-ab-hiristiyan-kulubu-degilse,YgpH_lDlnEuHRMwWwwGYkA.
  49. NTV. 2011. Kadin tecavuzcusuyle evlensin (Women to Marry Their Rapists). 17 September. Available at: http://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/kadin-tecavuzcusuyle-evlensin,m_pzKI8kP06ZFIEjG5ljrg.
  50. OECD. 2017. Employment DatabaseEmployment Indicators. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/employmentdatabase-employment.htm. Accessed 31 March 2018
  51. Rubery, J., D. Grimshaw, C. Fagan, H. Figueiredo, and M. Smith. 2003. Gender equality still on the European agenda—but for how long? Industrial Relations Journal 34(5): 477–497.Google Scholar
  52. Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedlemeier. 2004. Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 495–518.Google Scholar
  53. Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier (eds.). 2005. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schmidt, V.A. 2002. Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment? Comparative Political Studies 35(2): 168–193.Google Scholar
  55. Schmidt, V.A. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.Google Scholar
  56. Schmidt, V.A. 2012. Foreword. In The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies: A Discursive-Sociological Approach, ed. E. Lombardo, and M. Forest. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Sedelmeier, U. 2012. Is Europeanization Through Conditionality Sustainable? Lock-in of Institutional Change after EU Accession. West European Politics 35(1): 20–35.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, M., and P. Villa. 2010. The Ever-Declining Role of Gender Equality in the European Employment Strategy. Industrial Relations Journal 41(6): 526–543.Google Scholar
  59. Sol. 2012. Tecavuze ugrayan dogursun gerekirse devlet bakar (Rape Victims Should Give Birth; If Necessary, the State Will Look After the Newborns). 31 May. Available at: http://haber.sol.org.tr/devlet-ve-siyaset/saglik-bakani-imama-uydu-tecavuze-ugrayan-dogursun-gerekirse-devlet-bakar-haberi.
  60. TBMM (Grand National Assembly of Turkey). 2001. 21. Dönem, 4. Yasama Yılı, 3. Birleşim. TBMM Tutanak Dergisi, Vol. 71, 3 October 2001.Google Scholar
  61. Tocci, N. 2005. Europeanization in Turkey: Trigger or Anchor for Reforms? South European Society and Politics 10(1): 73–83.Google Scholar
  62. Tsarouhas, D. 2012. Social Policy in the EU and Turkey: The Limits of Europeanization. In Europeanization and Turkey. A Case Sui Generis?, ed. C. Nas, and Y. Özer, 161–180. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  63. Tsarouhas, D., and S. Ladi. 2013. Globalisation and/or Europeanisation? The Case of Flexicurity. New Political Economy 18(4): 480–502.Google Scholar
  64. Turkiye. 2000. Başbakan Ecevit: Kadın-erkek eşitliği uygarlıktır (Prime Minister Ecevit: Gender Equality is Civilization). 8 March. Available at: http://www.turkiyegazetesi.com.tr/Genel/a48346.aspx.
  65. Vatan. 2010a. Kadınla Erkek Eşit Olamaz! (Woman and Man Cannot be Equals). 20 July. Available at: http://www.gazetevatan.com/-kadinla-erkek-esit-olamaz—318006-siyaset/.
  66. Vatan. 2010b. Adalet Bakanı AB’ye çıkıştı (Justice Minister Lashes at EU). 20 November. Available at: http://www.gazetevatan.com/adalet-bakani–ab-ye-cikisti-341655-siyaset/.
  67. Velluti, S. 2012. Employment and the Lisbon Strategy. In The EU’s Lisbon Strategy: Evaluating Success, Understanding Failure, ed. P. Copeland, and D. Papadimitriou, 88–110. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Villa, P., and M. Smith. 2013. Policy in the Time of Crisis: Employment Policy and Gender Equality in Europe. In Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality, ed. M. Karamessini, and J. Rubery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Walby, S. 2004. The European Union and Gender Equality: Emergent Varieties of Gender Regime. Social Politics 11(1): 4–29.Google Scholar
  70. Yilmaz, G. 2015a. From Europeanization to de-Europeanization: The Europeanization Process of Turkey in 1999–2014. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24(1): 86–100.Google Scholar
  71. Yilmaz, S.A. 2015b. A New Momentum: Gender Justice in the Women’s Movement. Turkish Policy Quarterly 13(4): 107–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayşe İdil Aybars
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paul Copeland
    • 2
  • Dimitris Tsarouhas
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.School of Politics and International RelationsQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of International RelationsBilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations