Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 112–131 | Cite as

Still a glass ceiling? Tracing the limits to women’s representation in elected office

  • Corinna KroeberEmail author
  • Vanessa Marent
  • Jessica Fortin-Rittberger
  • Christina Eder
Original Article

Abstract

This article investigates the representation of women on the three subnational levels of government in Germany from 1995 to 2013, drawing on a novel data collection. Although longitudinal trends point to an overall increase on the national level, we find large variations—both upturns and downturns—from one election to the next on the state, district, and municipal levels. Our results suggest that a saturation point in women’s representation in subnational assemblies, located around 25%, largely accounts for these fluctuations. Assemblies featuring a high proportion of female officeholders before an election are more likely to experience stagnation and declines in subsequent elections. Legislatures with a low share of female representatives prior to an election, by contrast, experience the largest positive changes in their proportion of women. These findings contradict established theories that lead us to expect women’s representation to follow a self-reinforcing process, with parity as an end point. Rather, we find that women hit a ‘glass ceiling’ far sooner.

Keywords

Women’s representation Subnational government Gender Elections Glass ceiling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fritz-Thyssen-Stiftung (Grant AZ 20.14.0.003).

References

  1. Alexander, A.C. 2012. Change in Women’s Descriptive Representation and the Belief in Women’s Ability to Govern: A Virtuous Cycle. Politics & Gender 8(4): 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, K., and E.A. Cook. 1985. Women, Work, and Political Attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 29(3): 606–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, K., and S.J. Thorson. 1984. Congressional Turnover and the Election of Women. Western Political Quarterly 37(1): 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckwith, K. 1992. Comparative Research and Electoral Systems: Lessons from France and Italy. Women & Politics 12(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carbert, L. 2009. Are Cities more Congenial? Tracking the Rural Deficit of Women in the House of Commons. In Opening the Door Wider: Women’s Political Engagement in Canada, ed. S. Bashevkin, 70–92. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  6. Caul Kittilson, M. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Caul, M. 1999. Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties. Party Politics 5(1): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caul, M. 2001. Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross National Analysis. Journal of Politics 63(4): 1214–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cowell-Meyers, K. 2011. A Collarette on a Donkey: The Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition and the Limitations of Contagion Theory. Political Studies 59(2): 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahlerup, D. 1988. From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics. Scandinavian Political Studies 11(4): 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahlerup, D., and L. Freidenvall. 2005. Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women: Why Scandinavia is No Longer the Model. International Feminist Journal of Politics 7(1): 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson-Schmich, L.K. 2006. Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas. Evidence form the German Länder 1990–2000. Party Politics 12(2): 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson-Schmich, L.K. 2007. Ahead of Her Time: Eva Kolinsky and the Limits of German Gender Quotas. German Politics 16(3): 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson-Schmich, L.K. 2010. Gender Quota Compliance and Contagion in the 2009 Bundestag Election German. Politics & Society 28(3): 133–155.Google Scholar
  15. Davidson-Schmich, L.K. 2016. Gender Quotas and Democratic Participation: Recruiting Candidates for Elective Offices in Germany. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidson-Schmich, L.K., and I. Kürschner. 2011. Stößt die Frauenquote an ihre Grenzen? Eine Untersuchung der Bundestagswahl 2009. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 42(1): 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, R.H. 1997. Women and Power in Parliamentary Democracies: Cabinet Appointments in Western Europe, 1968–1992. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eder, C., and R. Magin. 2008. Wahlsysteme. In Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer. Politische Institutionen im Vergleich, ed. M. Freitag and A. Vatter, 33–62. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  19. Eder, C., and J. Fortin-Rittberger. 2017. Women and Parties in German Assemblies (WaP). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5990 Datafile Version 1.0.0.  https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12725.
  20. Eder, C., J. Fortin-Rittberger, and C. Kröber. 2016. The Higher the Fewer? Patterns of Female Representation Across Levels of Government in Germany. Parliamentary Affairs 69(2): 366–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fortin-Rittberger, J., and C. Eder. 2013. Towards a Gender-Equal Bundestag? The Impact of Electoral Rules on Women’s Representation. West European Politics 36(5): 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fortin-Rittberger, J., C. Eder, C. Kroeber, and V. Marent. 2017. How Party Systems Shape Local–National Gender Gaps. Government and Opposition.  https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2017.30.Google Scholar
  23. Henig, R., and S. Henig. 2001. Women and Political Power. Europe Since 1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Holtkamp, L., E. Wiechmann, and M. Buß. 2017. Genderranking deutscher Großstädte 2017. Nur 8,2 Prozent der Oberbürgermeister/innen sind weiblich. Böll.brief—Demokratiereformen 3, Heinrich-Böll Stiftung, Berlin.Google Scholar
  25. Hughes, M.M., and P. Paxton. 2008. Continuous Change, Episodes, and Critical Periods: a Framework for Understanding Women’s Political Representation over Time. Politics & Gender 4(2): 233–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inglehart, R. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Inglehart, R., and P. Norris. 2003a. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inglehart, R., and P. Norris. 2003b. The True Clash of Civilizations. Foreign Policy 135: 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Iversen, T., and F. Rosenbluth. 2008. Work and Power: The Connection Between Female Labour Force Participation and Female Political Participation. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kenny, M., and F. Mackay. 2014. When is Contagion Not Very Contagious? Dynamics of Women’s Political Representation in Scotland. Parliamentary Affairs 67(4): 866–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kenworthy, L., and M. Malami. 1999. Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis. Social Forces 78(1): 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kjaer, U. 1999. Saturation Without Parity: The Stagnating Number of Female Councillors in Denmark. In Elites, Parties and Democracy—Festschrift for Professor Mogens N. Pedersen, ed. E. Beukel, 149–168. Odensee: Odensee University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kjaer, U. 2011. Women in Politics: The National–Local Gap in Comparative Perspective. In Politik als Beruf, ed. M. Edinger and W.J. Patzelt, 334–351. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  35. Kolinsky, E. 1989. Women in West Germany: Life Work and Politics. New York: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Kolinsky, E. 1991. Political Representation and Parliamentary Careers: Women’s Quotas in West Germany. West European Politics 14(1): 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kolinsky, E. 1993. Party Change and Women’s Representation in Unified Germany. In Gender and Party Politics, ed. J. Lovenduski and P. Norris, 113–146. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Krook, M.L. 2006. Gender Quotas, Norms, and Politics. Politics & Gender 2(1): 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kunovich, S., and P. Paxton. 2005. Pathways to Power: The Role of Political Parties in Women’s National Political Representation. American Journal of Sociology 111(2): 505–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. “Effective” Number of Parties. A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12(1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lawless, J.L., and R.L. Fox. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leyenaar, M. 2013. Netherlands: Gender Balance Here to Stay? In Breaking Male Dominance in Old Democracies, ed. D. Dahlerup and M. Leyenaar, 172–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lovenduski, J., and P. Norris. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. MacManus, S.A. 1981. A City’s First Female Officeholder: “Coattails” for Future Female Officeseekers? Political Research Quarterly 34(1): 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Magin, R. 2010a. Frauen in Kreisparlamenten—zwischen Einzelfall und Normalfall. In Vergleichende subnationale Analysen für Deutschland. Institutionen, Staatstätigkeiten und politische Kulturen, ed. M. Freitag and A. Vatter, 271–313. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Magin, R. 2010b. Kommunalwahlsysteme zwischen Konkordanz-und Konkurrenzdemokratie. Ein Vergleich der 16 Bundesländer. In Vergleichende subnationale Analysen für Deutschland. Institutionen, Staatstätigkeiten und politische Kulturen, ed. M. Freitag and A. Vatter, 97–129. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  48. Mateo Diaz, M. 2005. Representing Women? Female Legislation in West European Parliaments. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  49. Matland, R.E. 1993. Institutional Variables Affecting Female Representation in National Legislatures: The Case of Norway. Journal of Politics 55(3): 737–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matland, R.E. 1998. Enhancing Women’s Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems. In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, ed. A. Karam, 65–88. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
  51. Matland, R.E., and D.T. Studlar. 1996a. The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway. Journal of Politics 58(3): 707–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Matland, R.E., and D.T. Studlar. 1996b. The Dynamics of Women’s Representation in the Canadian Provinces: 1975–1994. Canadian Journal of Political Science 29(2): 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Matland, R.E., and D.T. Studlar. 1998. Gender and Electoral Opportunity Structure in the Canadian Provinces. Political Research Quarterly 51(1): 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McKay, J. 2004. Women in German Politics: Still Jobs for the Boys? German Politics 13(1): 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moncrief, G.F., and J.F. Thompson. 1991. Urban and Rural Ridings and Women in Provincial Politics in Canada: A Research Note. Canadian Journal of Political Science 24(4): 831–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Norris, P. 2004. Electoral Engineering. Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2001. Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation. Journal of Democracy 12(3): 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ohmura, T., S. Bailer, P. Meiβner, and P. Selb. 2018. Party Animals, Career Changers and Other Pathways into Parliament. West European Politics 41(1): 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paxton, P., M.M. Hughes, and M.A. Painter. 2010. Growth in Women’s Political Representation. A Longitudinal Exploration of Democracy, Electoral System and Gender Quotas. European Journal of Political Research 49(1): 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reynolds, A. 1999. Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the World: Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling. World Politics 51(4): 547–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rincker, M. 2009. Masculinized or Marginalized: Decentralization and Women’s Status in Regional Polish Institutions. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 30(1): 46–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosenbluth, F., and R. Salmond. 2006. Welfare Works: Explaining Female Legislative Representation. Politics & Gender 2(2): 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Salmond, R. 2006. Proportional Representation and Female Parliamentarians. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(2): 175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schwindt-Bayer, L.A. 2005. The Incumbency Disadvantage and Women’s Election to Legislative Office. Electoral Studies 24(2): 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Siaroff, A. 2000. Women’s Representation in Legislatures and Cabinets in Industrial Democracies. International Political Science Review 21(2): 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stockemer, D., and M. Byrne. 2012. Women’s Representation Around the World: The Importance of Women’s Participation in the Workforce. Parliamentary Affairs 65(4): 802–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stockemer, D., and A. Sundström. 2016. Modernization Theory: How to Measure and Operationalize It when Gauging Variation in Women’s Representation? Social Indicators Research 125(2): 695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Studlar, D.T., and I. McAllister. 1991. Political Recruitment to the Australian Legislature: Toward an Explanation of Women’s Electoral Disadvantages. Western Political Quarterly 44(2): 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Studlar, D.T., and I. McAllister. 2002. Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women’s Legislative Representation since 1950. European Journal of Political Research 41(2): 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Studlar, D.T., and S. Welch. 1991. Does District Magnitude Matter? Women Candidates in London Local Elections. Western Political Quarterly 44(2): 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tremblay, M., and R. Pelletier. 2001. More Women Constituency Party Presidents: A Strategy for Increasing the Number of Women Candidates in Canada. Party Politics 7(2): 157–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wolbrecht, C., and D.E. Campbell. 2007. Leading by Example: Female Members of Parliament as Political Role Models. American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 921–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corinna Kroeber
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vanessa Marent
    • 1
  • Jessica Fortin-Rittberger
    • 1
  • Christina Eder
    • 2
  1. 1.University of SalzburgSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations