Advertisement

The Eurosceptic Europeanization of public spheres: print and social media reactions to the 2014 European Parliament elections

  • Anamaria Dutceac Segesten
  • Michael Bossetta
Original Article

Abstract

The present study tests the theoretical claim that Eurosceptics contribute to the Europeanization of national public spheres. Although advocating a renationalization of European politics, Eurosceptic parties can engender public media debates of transnational or European relevance. Through a comparative research design of two national cases (Sweden and Denmark), we examine the public discourse on the day following the 2014 European Parliament elections across three media: print, Twitter, and Facebook. Separating the discussions of Eurosceptic issues and actors from other topics of the election coverage, we find that the discourses about Euroscepticism exhibit a higher degree of Europeanization in four of the six media analyzed. Moreover, while we detect significant differences in valence between the Swedish and Danish press when reporting about the Eurosceptics, such national variation is much less pronounced on the social networking sites. The findings suggest, firstly, that Eurosceptics’ contestation of the EU may have the unintended effect of giving national media debates a stronger European dimension. Secondly, the study warrants moderate optimism for the Europeanization potential of social media vis-à-vis traditional media structures: Print media was more Europeanized in scope, whereas social media publics were more aligned in their sentiment toward Euroscepticism.

Keywords

Euroscepticism Political communication Facebook Twitter Sweden Denmark 

References

  1. Barberá, P., M. Piccirilli, A. Geisler, and W. van Atteveldt. 2017. Rfacebook: Access to Facebook API via R. R package version 0.6.15. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rfacebook.
  2. Barberá, P., and G. Rivero. 2014. Understanding the political representativeness of Twitter users. Social Science Computer Review.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, W.L., and S. Iyengar. 2008. A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication 58(4): 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossetta, M., A. Dutceac Segesten, and H.-J. Trenz. 2017. Transnational citizen engagement through social networking media: The factual, the ideological, and the moral style. In Social media and European politics: Rethinking power and legitimacy in the digital era, ed. Asimina Michailidou, and Mauro Barisione. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  5. Brüggemann, M., and K. Kleinen von Königslöw. 2007. Let’s talk about Europe’: Explaining vertical and horizontal Europeanization in the quality press. TranState working papers.Google Scholar
  6. Brüggemann, M., S. Sifft, K.K. Königslöw, B. Peters, and A. Wimmel. 2008. Segmented Europeanization: Trends and patterns in the transnationalization of public spheres in Europe. In Public deliberation and public culture: The writings of Bernhard Peters, 1993–2005, ed. H. Wessler, 196–212. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. De Wilde, P. 2011. No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration. Journal of European Integration 33(5): 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Wilde, P., and C. Lord. 2016. Assessing actually-existing trajectories of EU politicisation. West European Politics 39(1): 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demker, M. 2012. Scandinavian right-wing parties. Diversity more than convergence? In Mapping the extreme right in contemporary Europe from local to transnational, ed. EGaBJ Andrea Mammone, 239–253. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Dutceac Segesten, A., and M. Bossetta. 2016. A typology of political participation online: How citizens used Twitter to mobilize during the 2015 British general elections. Information, Communication & Society. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252413.Google Scholar
  11. Esser, F., and J. Strömbäck. 2014. Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerhards, J., and M.S. Schäfer. 2010. Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany. New Media & Society 12(1): 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hallin, D.C., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Highfield, T., S. Harrington, and A. Bruns. 2013. Twitter as a technology for audiencing and fandom: The #Eurovision phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society 16(3): 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jungherr, A. 2014. The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and content. Journal of communication 64(2): 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kevin, D. 2003. Europe in the media: A comparison of reporting, representation, and rhetoric in national media systems in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Lund, A.B. 2007. Media markets in Scandinavia: Political economy aspects of convergence and divergence. Nordicom Review(Jubilee issue): 121–134.Google Scholar
  18. Mazzoleni, G., and W. Schulz. 1999. “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political communication 16(3): 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCombs, M. (1997). Building consensus: The news media's agenda-setting roles. Political Communication 14(4): 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Messing, S., and S.J. Westwood. 2014. Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research 41(8): 1042–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mjøs, O.J., T. Syvertsen, H. Moe, and G.S. Enli. 2014. The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  22. Moe, H., and A.O. Larsson. 2013. Untangling a complex media system: A comparative study of Twitter-linking practices during three Scandinavian election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 775–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Papacharissi, Z., and M. de Fatima Oliveira. 2012. Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on# Egypt. Journal of Communication 62(2): 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfetsch, B., S. Adam, and B. Eschner. 2008. The contribution of the press to Europeanization of public debates: A comparative study of issue salience and conflict lines of European integration. Journalism 9(4): 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Radaelli, C. 2003. The Europeanization of public policy. In The politics of Europeanization, ed. K. Featherstone, and C. Radaelli, 27–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Risse, T. 2014. Introduction: European public spheres. In European public spheres: Politics is back, ed. T. Risse, 1–26. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sifft, S., M. Brüggemann, K. Kleinen von Königslöw, B. Peters, and A. Wimmel. 2007. Segmented Europeanization: Exploring the legitimacy of the European Union from a public discourse perspective. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(1): 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Statham, P., and H.J. Trenz. 2013. The politicization of Europe: Contesting the constitution in the mass media. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Trenz, H.-J. 2008. Media: The unknown player in European integration. In Media, democracy and European culture, ed. I. Bondebjerg, and P. Madsen, 49–64. London: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  30. Treib, O. 2014. The voter says no, but nobody listens: Causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10): 1541–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Twitter. 2014. European Parliament: How did the European Parliament use Twitter to inform, inspire and engage voters ahead of elections? https://biz.Twitter.com/success-stories/European-parliament. Accessed April 22 2015.
  32. Twittercensus. 2014. Presentation Twitter census. http://twittercensus.se/presentation-twittercensus-2014/. Accessed Dec 2016.

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European StudiesLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark

Personalised recommendations