Advertisement

Comparative Economic Studies

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 230–253 | Cite as

The Political Economy of Populism: An Empirical Investigation

  • Petar Stankov
Article
  • 145 Downloads

Abstract

Various macro-shocks arguably affect the demand for populism. However, there is no evidence beyond a few case studies. I expand electoral data on left- and right-wing populism and link them with per capita income, inflation, unemployment, government expenditures, income inequality, migration, trade and financial openness, and natural resource rents. Negative shocks in some of those consistently predict a surge in populist votes, even in the presence of inherent populist cycles. Shocks also affect election outcomes of left-wing and right-wing populists differently. Finally, European and Latin American voters are still different, yet converging, in their post-crisis preferences for populism.

Keywords

Left-wing populism Right-wing populism Political economy Populist cycles 

JEL Classification

D72 P16 P48 P51 O57 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Martin Rode (University of Navarra) for sharing The Wild Bunch! data and to Andreas Heinö (Timbro Institute) for sharing the Timbro Authoritarian Populism data. Two anonymous referees, and the participants at the 12th Young Economists Seminar of the 23rd Dubrovnik Economic Conference offered invaluable advice for further improvements, especially: Oleh Havrylyshyn, Ricardo Lago, Randall K. Filer, Paul De Grauwe, Yuemei Ji, and Vahagn Jerbashian. Luboslav Kostov provided helpful research assistance.

References

  1. Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cahill, B. 2007. Of note: Institutions, populism, and immigration in Europe. SAIS Review 27(1): 79–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cameron, A.C., J.B. Gelbach, and D.L. Miller. 2008. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. The Review of Economics and Statistics 90(3): 414–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinn, M.D., and H. Ito. 2006. What matters for financial development? Capital controls, institutions, and interactions. Journal of Development Economics 81(1): 163–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chinn, M.D., and H. Ito. 2008. A new measure of financial openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 10(3): 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalio, R., S. Kryger, J. Rogers, and G. Davis. 2017. Populism: The phenomenon. Technical Report 3/22/2017, Bridgewater Associates, LP.Google Scholar
  7. Dornbusch, R., and S. Edwards. 1990. Macroeconomic populism. Journal of Development Economics 32(2): 247–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dornbusch, R., and S. Edwards. 1991. Introduction to “The macroeconomics of populism in Latin America”. In The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, ed. R. Dornbusch, and S. Edwards, 1–4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dovis, A., M. Golosov, and A. Shourideh. 2016. Political economy of sovereign debt: A theory of cycles of populism and austerity. Working Paper 21948, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  10. Esarey, J., and A. Menger. 2018. Practical and effective approaches to dealing with clustered data. Political Science Research and Methods , 1–19.Google Scholar
  11. Gidron, N., and P.A. Hall. 2017. The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology 68: S57–S84.Google Scholar
  12. Greskovits, B. 1993. The use of compensation in economic adjustment programmes. Acta Oeconomica 45(1/2): 43–68.Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins, K.A. 2009. Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies 42(8): 1040–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinö, A.J. 2016. Timbro Authoritarian Populism Index 2016. Stockholm: Timbro Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Hewison, K. 2005. Neo-liberalism and domestic capital: The political outcomes of the economic crisis in Thailand. The Journal of Development Studies 41(2): 310–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ibragimov, R., and U.K. Müller. 2010. t-statistic based correlation and heterogeneity robust inference. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 28(4): 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, E. 2007. Populism in Europe. SAIS Review 27(1): 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaufman, R .R., and B. Stallings. 1991. The political economy of Latin American populism. In The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, ed. R. Dornbusch, and S. Edwards, 15–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Leon, G. 2014. Strategic redistribution: The political economy of populism in Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy 34: 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsen, E., G.J. Natvik, and R. Torvik. 2016. Petro populism. Journal of Development Economics 118: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mazzuca, S.L. 2013. Lessons from Latin America: The rise of rentier populism. Journal of Democracy 24(2): 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Milanovic, B.L. 2014. All the Ginis, 1950–2012. Updated in Autumn 2014.Google Scholar
  24. Moffitt, B. 2015. How to perform crisis: A model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism. Government and Opposition 50(2): 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nohlen, D. 2005. Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook: Volume 2. South America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ocampo, E. 2015. Commodity price booms and populist cycles. An explanation of Argentina’s decline in the 20th century. CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 562, Universidad del CEMA.Google Scholar
  27. OECD. 2017. International migration database. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org.
  28. Roberts, K.M. 2007. Latin America’s populist revival. SAIS Review 27(1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rode, M., and J. Revuelta. 2015. The wild bunch! An empirical note on populism and economic institutions. Economics of Governance 16(1): 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodrik, D. 2017. Populism and the economics of globalization. Working Paper 23559, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  31. Rohac, D., S. Kumar, and A. Heinö. 2017. The wisdom of demagogues: Institutions, corruption and support for authoritarian populists. Economic Affairs 37(3): 382–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sachs, J.D., and A.M. Warner. 1999. The big push, natural resource booms and growth. Journal of Development Economics 59(1): 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tejapira, K. 2002. Post-crisis economic impasse and political recovery in Thailand: The resurgence of economic nationalism. Critical Asian Studies 34(3): 323–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. United Nations. 2017a. Trends in international migrant stock: The 2017 revision. Downloaded Jan. 20, 2018.Google Scholar
  35. United Nations. 2017b. World population prospects: The 2017 revision. Downloaded Aug. 6, 2017.Google Scholar
  36. UNU-WIDER. 2017. World income inequality database (WIID3.4). Downloaded Sep. 13, 2017.Google Scholar
  37. World Bank. 2017. World Development Indicators, 1960–2016. Downloaded Aug. 6: 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Comparative Economic Studies 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economics DepartmentUniversity of National and World EconomySofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations