Advertisement

Gender pay gap reporting regulations: advancing gender equality policy in tough economic times

  • Susan MilnerEmail author
Original Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

This article sets out to explain why mandatory gender pay gap reporting regulations were introduced in 2016, whereas the two main parties had previously opposed state regulation. Observing the rise in the number of female MPs, it argues that the rise in descriptive representation has enabled substantive representation, but that this does not necessarily explain outcomes. Critical mass is a problematic concept due to difficulties of definition. Rather, the empirical evidence supports the idea that critical actors able to build alliances within the state machinery and beyond it, particularly by working with business influencers, are decisive in exploiting opportunities for change and securing support for it. Feminization of parliament and government also facilitate institutionalization of gender equality actors, although this process remains incomplete and contingent.

Keywords

Gender pay gap reporting Gender equality policy Equality act 2010 State feminism Equality machinery Critical actors 

Notes

References

  1. Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) and Government Equalities Office (GEO). 2017. Gender pay gap reporting. London: ACAS/GEO.Google Scholar
  2. Aitkenhead, D. 2018. “This is kind of… revolutionary”: Labour’s former deputy Harriet Harman on exposing the pay gap and what may prove the most radical achievement of her career”. Interview. The Guardian, 13 January, p. 36.Google Scholar
  3. Annesley, C. 2010. Gender, politics and policy change: The case of welfare reform under New Labour. Government and Opposition 45 (1): 50–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Annesley, C., and F. Gains. 2010. The core executive: gender, power and change. Political Studies 58: 909–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Annesley, C., and F. Gains. 2013. Investigating the economic determinants of the UK gender equality policy agenda. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15 (1): 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asthana, A. 2018. Harriet Harman hails the rise of ‘Tory feminist’ MPs. The Guardian 6 March, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/06/harriet-harman-hails-the-rise-of-tory-feminist-mps, accessed 7 May 2018.
  7. Brett, S. 2015. Gender pay gap reporting: will it be anything more than a gimmick? Touchstone blog, TUC, 14 October 2015, https://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2015/10/gender-pay-gap-reporting-is-it-anything-more-than-a-policy-gimmick/, accessed 17 October 2018.
  8. Brett, S. 2016. Mandatory gender pay gap reporting: just two more years to wait!! Touchstone blog, TUC, 12 February, https://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2016/02/mandatory-gender-pay-gap-reporting-just-two-more-years-to-wait/, accessed 17 October 2018.
  9. Brett, S., and S. Milsome. 2004. Monitoring progress on equal pay reviews. Research Discussion Series. Manchester: EOC.Google Scholar
  10. Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee. 2018. Gender pay gap reporting. Thirteenth report of session 20172019. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
  11. Calkin, S. 2016. Globalizing ‘girl power’: corporate social responsibility and transnational business initiatives for gender equality. Globalizations 13 (2): 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, R., and S. Childs. 2015. Conservatism, feminisation and the representation of women in British politics. British Politics 10 (2): 148–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Celis, K., S. Childs, J. Kantola, and M.L. Krook. 2008. Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Representation 44 (2): 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chicha, M.-T. 2006. A comparative analysis of promoting pay equity: models and impacts. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  15. Childs, S. 2001. ‘Attitudinally feminist?’ The new Labour women MPs and the substantive representation of women. Politics 21 (3): 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Childs, S. 2016. The good parliament report. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  17. Childs, S., and M.L. Krook. 2006. Should feminists give up on critical mass? A contingent Yes. Politics & Gender 2 (4): 522–530.Google Scholar
  18. Childs, S., and M.L. Krook. 2008. Critical mass theory and women’s political representation. Political Studies 56 (3): 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Childs, S., and M.L. Krook. 2009. Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition 44 (2): 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Childs, S., and P. Webb. 2012. Sex, gender and the Conservative Party: From iron lady to kitten heels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Confederation of British Industry (CBI). 2008. Talent not tokenism: The business benefits of workforce diversity. London: CBI.Google Scholar
  22. CBI. 2016. Time for action: The business case for inclusive workplaces. London: CBI.Google Scholar
  23. CBI. 2017. Workplace diversity ‘at risk of going backwards’. Press release, 23 April, http://www.cbi.org.uk/news/workplace-diversity-at-risk-of-going-backwards), accessed 9 January 2018.
  24. Conley, H. 2014. Trade unions, equal pay and the law in the UK. Economic and Industrial Democracy 35 (2): 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cooke, L.Prince. 2011. Gender-class inequality in political economies. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Dahlerup, D. 1988. From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deakin, S., C. McLaughlin, and D. Chai. 2012. Gender inequality and reflexive law: The potential of different regulatory mechanisms. In Making employment rights effective. Issues of enforcement and compliance, ed. L. Dickens, 114–137. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Deakin, S., S. Fraser Butlin, C. McLaughlin, and A. Polanska. 2015. Are litigation and collective bargaining complements or substitutes for achieving gender quality? A study of the British Equal Pay Act. Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (2): 381–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). 2018. Ethnicity pay reporting Government consultation. London: BEIS.Google Scholar
  30. Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). 2007. Discrimination law review: a framework for fairness. Proposals for a Single Equality Bill for Great Britain. London: DCLG.Google Scholar
  31. Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). 2013. Equal pay audits. A further consultation. The government’s response. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  32. Dickens, L. 2012a. Introduction—Making employment rights effective: Issues of enforcement and compliance. In Making employment rights effective. Issues of enforcement and compliance, ed. L. Dickens, 1–6. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Dickens, L. 2012b. Fairer workplaces: Making employment rights effective. In Making employment rights effective. Issues of enforcement and compliance, ed. L. Dickens, 205–228. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC). 2001. Just pay. Manchester: EOC.Google Scholar
  35. EOC. 2002. Equal Pay Review Kit. Manchester: EOC.Google Scholar
  36. European Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). 2010. Strengthening the human rights architecture in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU.Google Scholar
  37. Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). 2018. Closing the gap: enforcing the gender pay gap regulations. London: EHRC.Google Scholar
  38. EHRC. 20018b. Gender pay gap: our enforcement action. 21 September, https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/pay-gaps/gender-pay-gap-our-enforcement-action, accessed 8 October 2018.
  39. Fawcett Society. 2018. Gender pay gap reporting deadline briefing. London: Fawcett Society.Google Scholar
  40. Fredman, S. 2008. Reforming equal pay laws. Industrial Law Journal 37 (3): 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gordon, S. and B. Ehrenberg-Shannon. 2018. Maria Miller attacks ‘toothless’ equality regulator on gender pay. Financial Times 24 February, https://www.ft.com/content/4f7186b6-17d8-11e8-9376-4a6390addb44, accessed 5 September 2018.
  42. Government Equalities Office (GEO) (2013) Think, Act, Report. Two years on. London: GEO.Google Scholar
  43. GEO. 2016. Closing the gender pay gap. Government response to the consultation. London: GEO.Google Scholar
  44. Grey, S. 2006. Numbers and beyond: the relevance of critical mass in gender research. Politics & Gender 2 (4): 492–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grimshaw, D. 2007. New Labour policy and the gender pay gap. In Women and New Labour. Engendering politics and policy?, ed. C. Annesley, F. Gains, and K. Rummery, 133–154. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hall, P., and D. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hansard (2018a) Gender pay gap. Volume 639, 18 April. London: UK Parliament.Google Scholar
  48. Hansard. 2018b. Gender pay gap reporting: reporting process. Volume 646, 13 September. London: UK Parliament.Google Scholar
  49. Harrington, J. 2001. Making sense of equality law: A review of the Hepple report. The Modern Law Review 64 (5): 757–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harman, H. 2017. A woman’s work. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  51. Hebson, G., and J. Rubery. 2018. Employment relations and gender equality. In The Routledge companion to employment relations, ed. A. Wilkinson, T. Dundon, J. Donaghey, and A.S. Colvin, 93–107. London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hepple, B. 2011a. Equality. The new legal framework. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Hepple, B. 2011b. Enforcing equality law: Two steps forward and two steps backwards for reflexive regulation. Industrial Law Review 40 (4): 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hepple, B. 2012. Agency enforcement of workplace equality. In Making employment rights effective. Issues of enforcement and compliance, ed. L. Dickens, 49–66. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Hepple, B. 2013. Back to the future: Employment law under the Coalition government. Industrial Law Journal 42 (3): 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Holli, A.M. 2008. Feminist triangles: A conceptual analysis. Representation 44 (2): 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Howlett, M., and B. Cashore. 2014. Conceptualizing public policy. In Comparative policy studies: conceptual and methodological challenges, ed. I. Engeli and C. Rothmayr, 17–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. IFF Research. 2015. Company reporting: Gender pay data. London: IFF Research.Google Scholar
  59. Institute of Government. Ministers reflect: Patricia Hewitt (interviewed by N. Hughes and P. Riddell), 11 July, 2016, https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/ministers-reflect/person/patricia-hewitt/, accessed 9 January 2018.
  60. Kahn, P., and E. Meehan (eds.). 1992. Equal value/comparative worth in the UK and the USA. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  61. Kanter, R. Moss. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  62. Kantola, J., and Squires, J. 2012. From state feminism to market feminism? International Political Science Review 33 (4): 382–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Keen, R., R. Cracknell, and M. Bolton. Women in parliament and government, 2018. House of Commons Briefing Paper no. SNO1250.Google Scholar
  64. Kingsmill, D. 2001. A review of women’s employment and pay. London: Women and Equality Unit.Google Scholar
  65. Labour Research Department (LRD) (2018) So Mr Chief Executive, why do you pay women less than men? Workplace Report, April.Google Scholar
  66. Lovenduski, J. 2007. Unfinished business: equality policy and the changing context of state feminism in Great Britain. In Changing state feminism, ed. J. Outshoorn and J. Kantola, 144–163. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Martinson, J. Gender pay gap: government should lead by example, says Maria Miller. The Guardian 7 November 2013, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/nov/07/gender-pay-gap-government-maria-miller, accessed 15 October 2018.
  68. Mätzke, M., and I. Ostner. 2010. Postscript: Ideas and agents of change in time. Journal of European Social Policy 20 (5): 468–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mazur, A.G. 2002. Theorizing feminist public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McBride, D.E., and A.G. Mazur. 2010. The politics of state feminism. Innovation in comparative policy research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  71. McGuinness, F. and Pyper, D. (2018) The gender pay gap. House of Commons Briefing Paper, no.7068.Google Scholar
  72. Milner, S. 2010. ‘Choice’ and ‘flexibility’ in reconciling work and family: towards a convergence in policy discourse on work and family in France and the UK? Policy and Politics 38 (1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Neathey, F., R. Willison, K. Akroyd, J. Regan, and D. Hill. Equal pay reviews in practice, 2005. Working Paper 33. Manchester: EOC.Google Scholar
  74. Newman, J. 2012. Working the spaces of power: Activism, neoliberalism and gendered labour. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  75. O’Connor, J., A. Orloff, and S. Shaver. 1999. States, markets, families: Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Özbilgin, M., and A. Tatli. 2011. Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: Rise of individualism and voluntarism. Human Relations 64 (9): 1229–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Prügl, E. 2015. Neoliberalising feminism. New Political Economy 20 (4): 2014–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rubery, J., and D. Grimshaw. 2015. The 40-year pursuit of equal pay: A case of constantly moving goalposts. Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (2): 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schäfer, S., M. Winterbotham, and F. McAndrew. 2005. Equal pay reviews survey 2004. Working Paper 32. Manchester: EOC.Google Scholar
  80. Sharp, R. 2018. Bridging the gender pay gap: where now? HR Magazine, 18 September.Google Scholar
  81. Squires, J. 2007. The new politics of gender equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swinson, J. 2018a. Celebrating yet another win in my campaign for greater transparency in parental leave and pay. Liberal Democrat Voice 3 October, http://www.libdemvoice.org/celebrating-yet-another-win-in-my-campaign-for-greater-transparency-in-parental-leave-and-pay-58779.html, accessed 5 October 2018.
  83. Swinson, J. 2018b. Equal power and how you can make it happen. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  84. Topping, A. 2018. Exclusive: #PayMeToo campaign launched to close gender pay gap. The Guardian, 2 April, https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/apr/02/exclusive-paymetoo-campaign-launched-close-gender-pay-gap, accessed 7 May 2018.
  85. Treasury Select Committee. 2018. Women in finance. Fifteenth report of session 2017–2019. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
  86. Vargas, V., and S. Wieringa. 1998. The triangles of empowerment: processes and actors in the making of public policy. In Women’s movements and public policy in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, ed. G. Lycklama Nijeholt, V. Vargas, and S. Wieringa, 3–23. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  87. Women and Equalities Committee (WEC). 2016. Gender pay gap. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
  88. WEC. 2017. Oral evidence—Work of the Government Equalities Office, HC356. 11 October.Google Scholar
  89. WEC. 2018. The role of Minister for Women and Equalities and the place of GEO in government. Second report of session 2017–2018. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Policy ResearchUniversity of BathBathEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations