Making up families: how DNA analysis does/does not verify relatedness in family reunification in Finland
- 3 Downloads
This article examines the role of DNA testing in immigration management practices in which individuals and their kin relationships are modified as objects of investigation: defined, categorised and “made up” (Hacking in Historical ontology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2002) as families. Analysis focuses on the interplay of documents (or lack thereof), narratives and DNA analysis that produces evidentiary facts and knowledge about migrants and, simultaneously, forges relationships between individuals, families and other collectives. Analysis of the Finnish administrative and legal data concerning family reunification shows that DNA testing does much more than just provide evidence of the existence of a genetic tie between alleged family members; testing can also be translated into proof of ‘true’ families or extended to test the credibility of the applicants. Via translations and extensions, the accuracy of DNA analysis is intertwined with the contingencies of decision-making in the context of immigration management. Related to this, the article demonstrates that DNA testing supports the process by which immigration authorities in the Global North constitute the family as contingent, indefinite and even arbitrary, rather than consolidating a clear and solid model of eligibility for family reunification.
KeywordsDNA testing Family reunification Immigration management Finland
This study was funded by the Academy of Finland (Grant Number 135266) and the Kone Foundation.
- Anderlik, M., and M.A. Rothstein. 2002. DNA-based identity testing and the future of the family: A research agenda. American Journal of Law and Medicine 28 (2–3): 215–232.Google Scholar
- Barata, L. 2012. Genetic testing in immigration for family reunification: Ethical, legal and social implication. Dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
- Canadian Council of Refugees. 2011. DNA Test: A barrier for speedy family reunification. http://ccrweb.ca/files/dnatests.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2016.
- Dijstelbloem, H., and A. Meijer (eds.). 2011. Migration and the new technological borders of Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Dove, E.S. 2014. Back to blood: The sociopolitics and law of compulsory DNA testing of refugees. University of Massachusetts Law Review 8 (2): 466–530.Google Scholar
- Esbenshade, J. 2010. An assessment of DNA testing for African refugees. Washington, DC: Immigration Policy Center.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2011. Green paper on the right to family reunification of third-country nationals living in the European Union (Directive 2003/86/EC). EUR-Lex. Official Journal of the European Union 735: 1–12.Google Scholar
- European Migration Network. 2009. Ad hoc query on conducting other investigations (using a DNA test) in family reunification. http://emn.intrasoft-intl.com/html/index.html. Accessed 24 April 2014.
- European Migration Network. 2010. Policies on reception, return and integration arrangements for, and numbers of unaccompanied minors: An EU comparative study. London: European Migration Network.Google Scholar
- European Migration Network. 2012a. Misuse of the right to family reunification: Marriages of convenience and false declarations of parenthood. http://www.emn.at/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/0a_EMN_Misuse_Family_Reunification_Study_PUBLICATION.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2014.
- European Migration Network. 2012b. Misuse of the right to family reunification: Marriages of convenience and false declarations of parenthood. National Contribution of Finland. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/reports/docs/emn-studies/family-reunification/fi_20120327_familyreunificationstudy_final_en.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2014.
- European Migration Network. 2016. EMN Hoc query on checking identity and family relationships in case of family reunification with a beneficiary of international protection. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/reports/docs/ad-hoc-queries/ad-hoc-queries-2016.1074_nl_checking_identity_and_family_relationships.pdf. Accessed 24 Sep 2016.
- European Migration Network. 2017. Family reunification of third-country nationals in the EU plus Norway: National practices. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/00_family_reunification_synthesis_report_final_en_print_ready_0.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
- Eurostat. 2016. Residence permits statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Residence_permits_statistics. Accessed 10 June 2017.
- Fingerroos, O., A.-M. Tapaninen, and M. Tiilikainen. 2016. Johdanto. In Perheenyhdistäminen: Kuka saa perheen Suomeen, kuka ei ja miksi?, ed. O. Fingerroos, A.-M. Tapaninen, and M. Tiilikainen, 7–20. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
- Finnish Immigration Service. 2008. DNA analysis has unified a record number of immigrant families. http://www.migri.fi/for_the_media/bulletins/press_releases/press_releases/1/0/dna_testing_has_united_a_record_number_of_immigrant_families_13968. Accessed 18 Sept 2015.
- Finnish Immigration Service. 2014. Fact sheet: DNA test in connection with a residence permit application. https://migri.fi/documents/5202425/6160286/DNA+TEST+in+connection+with+a+residence+permit+application+%28en%29. Accessed 15 March 2015.
- Franklin, S., and S. McKinnon (eds.). 2001. Relative values: Reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Good, A. 2011. Witness statements and credibility in the British asylum courts. In Cultural Expertise and Litigation, ed. L. Holden, 94–122. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Good, A., D. Berti, and G. Tarabout. 2015. Introduction: Technologies of doubt in law and ritual. In Of doubt and proof: Ritual and legal practices of judgment, ed. D. Berti, A. Good, and G. Tarabout, 1–18. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Hacking, I. (2007) Kinds of people: Moving targets. In Proceedings of the British Academy: 2006 Lectures, Vol. 151, 285–318.Google Scholar
- Hall, K., and U. Naue. 2015. Austria: DNA profiling as a lie detector. In Suspect families: DNA analysis, family reunification and immigration policies, ed. T. Heinemann et al., 55–78. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Heinemann, T., and Lemke, T. 2015. Germany: The geneticisation of the family. In Suspect families: DNA analysis, family reunification and immigration policies, ed. T. Heinemann et al., 55–78. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Heinemann, T., I. Helén, T. Lemke, U. Naue, and M. Weiss (eds.). 2015. Suspect families: DNA analysis, family reunification and immigration policies. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Holland, E. 2011. Moving the virtual border to the cellular level: Mandatory DNA testing and the US refugee family reunification program. California Law Review 99 (6): 635–681.Google Scholar
- La Spina, E. 2012. DNA testing for family reunification in Europe: An exceptional resource? Migraciones Internacionales 6 (3): 39–74.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. 1986. Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies of Culture Past and Present 6: 1–40.Google Scholar
- Maahanmuuttovirasto. 2012. Vuosikertomus 2011. http://issuu.com/maahanmuuttovirasto/docs/vuosikertomus_2011. Accessed 24 April 2014.
- Maahanmuuttovirasto. 2013. Oleskelupa perhesiteen perusteella. Unpublished memorandum 13.5.2013. Helsinki: Maahanmuuttovirasto.Google Scholar
- Murdock, T.R. 2008. Whose child is this? Genetic analysis and family reunification immigration in France. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 41 (5): 1503–1534.Google Scholar
- Salazar, C. 2012. Are genes good to think with? In European kinship in the age of biotechnology, ed. J. Edwards and C. Salazar, 179–196. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
- Scott, James C. 1999. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, T., and L. Brownlees. 2011. Age assessment practices: A literature review & annotated bibliography. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
- Tapaninen, A.-M., and I. Helén. 2015. Finland: Securing human rights, suspecting fraud. In Suspect families. DNA analysis, family reunification and immigration policies, ed. Torsten. Heinemann et al., 33–53. Fernham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Ulkomaalaisvirasto. 2001. Ulkomaalaisviraston vuosikertomus 2000. Helsinki: Ulkomaalaisvirasto.Google Scholar
- UNHCR. 2008. UNHCR Note on DNA testing to establish family relationships in the refugee context. http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/48620c2d2.html. Accessed 24 April 2014.
- van der Ploeg, I. 2012. The body as data in the age of information. In Routledge handbook of surveillance studies, ed. K. Ball, K.V. Haggerty, and D. Lyon, 176–184. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Villiers, J.D. 2010. Brave new world: The use and potential misuse of DNA technology in immigration law. Boston College Third World Law Journal 30 (2): 239–271.Google Scholar