Advertisement

BioSocieties

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Organized polemics

  • Nicolas Langlitz
  • Des FitzgeraldEmail author
Books Forum

Nicolas Langlitz: I quit. I’ve edited the Books Forum for ten years and I feel it’s time for it to switch hands. I’m so glad they will be your hands, Des. While we all constantly read books and reviews of books, there isn’t a whole lot of discussion about the genre of the book review. That’s why we decided to talk about my experience with and your vision for the reviews section. One reason why I’m happy that you’re taking over is that I always thought of the Books Forum as key to the mission of BioSocieties to foster conversation between social researchers and life scientists—for example, by assigning reviews across disciplines. I very much enjoyed your book Rethinking Interdisciplinarity Across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences(2015), which you wrote with Felicity Callard, because it doesn’t degenerate into another soapbox oratory on the virtues of interdisciplinarity. It provides a frank account of a series of experiments in interdisciplinarity, both critical and constructive....

Notes

References

  1. Balmer, Andrew S., Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Felicity Callard, and Des Fitzgerald. 2018. ‘Could We Meet?’: A Conversation on Collaboration. Feeling and Failure. BioSocieties 13 (3): 668–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beer, David. 2016. In Defence of Writing Book reviews. Times Higher Education (April 7, 2016).Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, Gaymon. 2016a. Technicians of Human Dignity. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, Gaymon. 2016b. Praemeditatio Malorum: The Disquieting Spiritual Politics of Pope Francis’ Encyclical on Climate Change—or—How (Not) to Read Laudato Si. BioSocieties 11(3): 406–414.Google Scholar
  5. Besnier, Niko, and Pablo Morales. 2018. Tell the Story: How to Write for American Ethnologist. American Ethnologist 45 (2): 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boellstorff, Tom. 2008. How to Get an Article Accepted at American Anthropologist (or Anywhere). American Anthropologist 110 (3): 281–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callard, Felicity, and Des Fitzgerald. 2015. Rethinking Interdisciplinarity Across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Felski, Rita. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hacking, Ian. 2012. Two Histories of Autism, One by an Outsider. One by an Insider. BioSocieties 7 (3): 323–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagner, Michael. 2015. Zur Sache Des Buches. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Langlitz, Nicolas. 2010a. Biosciences, Ethics and Collaborations. BioSocieties 5 (3): 391–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Langlitz, Nicolas. 2010b. Cognitive Enhancement: Human Advancement, Degradation or Pseudo-Problem? BioSocieties 5 (4): 476–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Langlitz, Nicolas. 2014. Lessons and Conversions: Reading across Disciplinary Boundaries. BioSocieties 9 (2): 218–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marcus, George E. 2003. On the Unbearable Slowness of Being an Anthropologist Now: Notes on a Contemporary Anxiety in the Making of Ethnography. Cross Cultural Poetics 12 (12): 7–20.Google Scholar
  15. Markus, Gyorgy. 1987. Why Is There No Hermeneutics of Natural Sciences? Some Preliminary Theses. Science in Context 1 (1): 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1989. On the Genealogy of Morals. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  17. Quednow, Boris. 2010. Ethics of Neuroenhancement. A Phantom Debate. BioSocieties 5 (1): 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rabinow, Paul, and Gaymon Bennett. 2012. Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scheper-Hughes, N. 1992. Death Without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schiavenato, Stephanie, and Rayna Rapp. 2018. Enduring Innovation in Reproduction. BioSocieties 13 (2): 536–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strathern, M. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship, and the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Strathern, Marilyn. 2010. Ars Synthetica: A Rehearsal. BioSocieties 5 (3): 393–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New School for Social ResearchNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations