Advertisement

BioSocieties

pp 1–23 | Cite as

Fight for our health: Activism in the face of health insurance precarity

  • Beza MeridEmail author
Original Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act, which expanded health insurance coverage to millions of Americans and federally mandated the provision of health insurance to individuals with “pre-existing conditions,” is a politically divisive law facing an ongoing ‘repeal and replace’ effort in Congress. As patients, caregivers, and health activists fight to resist the repeal of the ACA, they are sharing intimate illness narratives in an effort to frame the repeal effort as a looting of their insurance benefits and an attack on the investment in equity and justice they say the ACA represents. Drawing on a discourse analysis of primary documents from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and illness narratives shared by the Service Employees International Union’s Fight For Our Health activist campaign, this article examines how the illness narrative is deployed here as a political call to action. I consider how this resistance effort frames the inevitability of illness and the emotional burdens of what I call ‘health insurance precarity,’ or the uncertainty that defines the experience of being uninsured, as a justification for positioning health activism as a cultural and political obligation shared by all.

Keywords

Health insurance precarity Pre-existing condition Responsible patienthood Affect Health activism Illness narrative 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Laurel Tamariz for providing insight into the story coordination process she manages for the FFOH campaign. This manuscript is comprised of original research material, and it is not under review elsewhere. I do not have any competing interests in this research.

References

  1. Abramowitz, J. 2018. The effect of ACA state medicaid expansions on medical out-of-pocket expenditures. Medical Care Research and Review.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558718768895.Google Scholar
  2. Bagley, Nicholas. 2018. Trump’s legal attack on the ACA isn’t about health care. It’s a war on the rule of law. Vox. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2018/6/8/17442238/trump-aca-obamacare-texas-department-of-justice-rule-of-law.
  3. Berlant, L. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berliner, L., and N. Kenworthy. 2017. Producing a worthy illness: Personal crowdfunding amidst financial crisis. Social Science and Medicine 187: 233–242.Google Scholar
  5. Brodie, M., D. Altman, C. Deane, S. Buscho, and E. Hamel. 2010. Liking the pieces, not the package: Contradictions in public opinion during health reform. Health Affairs 29 (6): 1125–1130.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, N. 2003. Hope against hype: Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies 16 (2): 3–21.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, P., et al. 2004. Emboddied health movements: New approaches to social movements in health. Sociology of Health and Illness 26 (1): 50–80.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, J. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Cartwright, L. 1998. Community and the public body in breast cancer media activism. Cultural Studies 12 (2): 117–138.Google Scholar
  10. Charon, Rita. 2001. Narrative medicine: A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. New England Journal of Medicine 286 (15): 1897–1902.Google Scholar
  11. Claxton, G. et al. 2016. Pre-existing conditions and medical underwriting in the individual insurance market prior to the ACA. The Kaiser Family Foundation, 1–11.Google Scholar
  12. Dumit, J. 2006. Illnesses you have to fight to get: Facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses. Social Science and Medicine 62 (3): 577–590.Google Scholar
  13. Dumit, J. 2012. Drugs for life: How pharmaceutical companies define our health. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, S. 1996. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Farman, A. 2017. Terminality. Social Text 35 (2(131)): 93–118.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, W.R. 1989. Clarifying the narrative paradigm. Communication Monographs 56: 55–58.Google Scholar
  17. Fletcher, R.A. 2014. Keeping up with the cadillacs: What health insurance disparities, moral hazard, and the cadillac tax mean to the patient protection and affordable care act. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 30 (1): 18–36.Google Scholar
  18. Gottschalk, M. 2007. Back to the future? Health benefits, organized labor, and universal health care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 32 (6): 923–970.Google Scholar
  19. Himmelstein, D., et al. 2009. Medical bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a national study. The American Journal of Medicine 122: 741–746.Google Scholar
  20. Horton, S., C. Abadía, J. Mulligan, and J.J. Thompson. 2014. Critical anthropology of global health “takes a stand” statement: A critical medical anthropological approach to the US’s affordable care act. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 28 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  21. Hunt, D. and Ramon, A. 2010. Killing ‘Killer King’ The Los Angeles times and a ‘troubled’ hospital in the ‘hood. In Black Los Angeles: American dreams and racial realities, 283-320. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jacobs, L.R., and S. Mettler. 2011. Why public opinion changes: The implications for health and health policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 36 (6): 917–933.Google Scholar
  23. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2017. Key facts about the uninsured population. https://www.kff.org/uninsured/fact-sheet/key-facts-about-the-uninsured-population/.
  24. Keefe, R., et al. 2006. From the bottom up: Tracing the impact of four health-based social movements on health and social policies. Journal of Health and Social Policy 21 (3): 55–69.Google Scholar
  25. Kleinman, A. 1988. The illness narratives: Suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Kneese, T. 2018. Mourning the commons: Circulating affect in crowdfunded funeral campaigns. Social Media Society 4 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
  27. Martinez-Hume, A., A.M. Baker, H.S. Bell, I. Montemayor, K. Elwell, and L.M. Hunt. 2017. “They treat you a different way:” Public insurance, stigma, and the challenge to quality health care. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 41: 161–180.Google Scholar
  28. Miller-Day, M., and M. Hecht. 2013. Narrative means to preventative ends: A narrative engagement framework for designing prevention interventions. Health Communication 28 (7): 657–670.Google Scholar
  29. McCosker, A., and R. Darcy. 2013. Living with cancer: Affective labour, self-expression and the utility of blogs. Information, Communication and Society 16 (8): 1266–1285.Google Scholar
  30. Mulligan, J.M., and H. Castañeda. 2018. Unequal coverage: The experience of health care reform in the United States. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Oberlander, J. 2010. Long time coming: Why health reform finally passed. Health Affairs 29 (6): 1112–1116.Google Scholar
  32. Oberlander, J. 2014. Between liberal aspirations and market forces: Obamacare’s precarious balancing act. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (4): 431–441.Google Scholar
  33. Oberlander, J. 2016. Implementing the affordable care act: The promise and limits of health care reform. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 41 (4): 803–826.Google Scholar
  34. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. 2011. At-risk: Pre-existing conditions could affect 1 in 2 Americans, 1–10. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  35. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. 2017. Health insurance coverage for americans with pre-existing conditions The impact of the affordable care act, 1–16. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  36. Papacharissi, Z. 2018. A networked self and platforms, stories, connections. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Parthasarathy, S. 2010. Breaking the expertise barrier: Understanding activist strategies in science and technology policy domains. Science and Public Policy 37 (5): 355–367.Google Scholar
  38. Quadagno, J. 2014. Right-wing conspiracy? Socialist plot? The origins of the patient protection and affordable care act. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 39 (1): 35–56.Google Scholar
  39. Rose, N., and C. Novas. 2005. Biological citizenship. In Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems, ed. A. Ong and S.J. Collier, 439–463. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Serlin, D. 2010. Imagining illness: Public health and visual culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Starr, P. 2011. Remedy and reaction: The peculiar American struggle over health care reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Squires, D., and C. Anderson. 2015. U.S. health care from a global perspective: Spending, use of services, prices, and health in 13 countries. The Commonwealth Fund 15: 1–16.Google Scholar
  43. Tamariz, L. 2017. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  44. Zoller, H. 2005. Health activism: Communication theory and action for social change. Communication Theory 15 (4): 341–364.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication StudiesUniversity of Michigan-Ann ArborAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations