BioSocieties

pp 1–17 | Cite as

Situating local biologies: Anthropological perspectives on environment/human entanglements

Original Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we posit the notion of ‘situated biologies’ as a conceptual contribution to the often-polarised debate over the material human body as being either local or universal. To argue our case, we briefly recapitulate the medical anthropological concept of ‘local biologies’ before highlighting current molecular biological research on epigenetics and its implications. We discuss how different forms of ‘local’ arise in environment/human entanglements and how material agency becomes situated and contingent through various knowledge practices. We conclude by developing the overarching concept of ‘situated biologies’ to further a collaborative ethnographic agenda that explores the multiple effects of particularising or universalising material agency in research on environment/human entanglements.

Keywords

local biology body ethnography medical anthropology situated knowledge epigenetics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

On behalf of both authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (1991) Global ethnoscapes: Notes and queries for a transnational anthropology.Google Scholar
  2. Akrich, M. and Pasveer, B. (2000) Multiplying obstetrics: Techniques of surveillance and forms of coordination. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21(1): 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronowitz, R. (2008) Framing disease: An underappreciated mechanism for the social patterning of health. Social Science & Medicine 67(1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bapteste, E. and Dupré, J. (2013) Towards a processual microbial ontology. Biology & Philosophy 28(2): 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barabasi, A.-L. (2007) Network medicine—from obesity to the “Diseasome’’. New England Journal of Medicine 357(4): 404–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barad, K. (1999) Agential realism: Feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In The Science Studies Reader, ed. M. Biagioli, 1–11. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Barrès, R., Yan, J., Egan, B., Treebak, J.T., Rasmussen, M., Fritz, T., Caidahl, K., Krook, A., O’Gorman, D.J. and Zierath, J.R. (2012) Acute exercise remodels promoter methylation in human skeletal muscle. Cell Metabolism 15(3): 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bateson, G. (1979) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, S. and Niewöhner, J. (2006) Somatographic investigations across levels of complexity. BioSocieties 1(2): 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bentley, A.F. (1941) The human skin: Philosophy’s last line of defense. Philosophy of Science 8: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borghol, N., Suderman, M., McArdle, W., Racine, A., Hallett, M., Pembrey, M., Hertzman, C., Power, C. and Szyf, M. (2012) Associations with early-life socio-economic position in adult DNA methylation. International Journal of Epidemiology 41(1): 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1985). Sozialer Raum und „Klassen“. Zwei Vorlesungen. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Brunner, E.J., Marmot, M.G., Nanchahal, K., Shipley, M.J., Stansfeld, S.A., Juneja, M. and Alberti, G.M.M. (1997) Social inequality in coronary risk: central obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Evidence from the Whitehall II study. Diabetologia 40(11): 1341–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Das, V. and Han, C. (2015) Living and Dying in the Contemporary World: A Compendium. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Daschuk, J.W. (2013) Clearing the Plains: Disease, Politics of Starvation, and the Loss of Aboriginal Life. Regina: University of Regina Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dawkins, R. (2006) The Selfish Gene. 30th Anniversary Ed. Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Daxinger, L. and Whitelaw, E. (2010) Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: More questions than answers. Genome Research 20(12): 1623–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewachi, O. (2017) Ungovernable Life: Mandatory Medicine and Statecraft Hin Iraq. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dupras, C. and Ravitsky, V. (2016) The ambiguous nature of epigenetic responsibility. Journal of Medical Ethics 42: 534–541.Google Scholar
  22. Dupré, J. (2014) A process ontology for biology. The Philosophers' Magazine (67): 81–88.Google Scholar
  23. Esteller, M. (2011) Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nature Reviews Genetics 12(12): 861–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fassin, D. (2009) Another politics of life is possible. Theory Culture & Society 26(5): 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fitzgerald, D. and Callard, F. (2014) Social science and neuroscience beyond interdisciplinarity: Experimental entanglements. Theory, Culture & Society 32(1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gammeltoft, T. (2014) Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilbert, S.F., Bosch, T.C.G. and Ledon-Rettig, C. (2015) Eco-Evo-Devo: Developmental symbiosis and developmental plasticity as evolutionary agents. Nature Reviews Genetics 16(10): 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gluckman, P.D., Hanson, M.A. and Pinal, C. (2005) The developmental origins of adult disease. Maternal & Child Nutrition 1(3): 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hacking, I. (2007) Kinds of people: Moving targets. Proceedings of the British Academy 151: 285–318.Google Scholar
  30. Haraway, D.J. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Haraway, D.J. (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hedlund, M. (2012) Epigenetic responsibility. Medicine Studies 3(3): 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hui, A., Schatzki, T. and Shove, E. (2016). The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Ingold, T. (2010) Footprints through the weather-world: walking, breathing, knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16: S121–S139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive. Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Ingold, T. and G. Palsson (2013) Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M.J. (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, Life and Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M.J. (2006) The evolution of information in the major transitions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 239(2): 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jablonka, E., M.J. Lamb. (1998) Epigenetic inheritance in evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11: 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keller, E.F. (2014) From gene action to reactive genomes. The Journal of Physiology 592(Pt 11): 2423–2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge - An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Krieger, N. (2005) Embodying Inequality: Epidemiologic Perspectives, Policy, Politics, Health, and Medicine Series. Amityville, NY: Baywood Pub.Google Scholar
  43. Krieger, N. (2012) History, Biology, and Health Inequities: Emergent Embodied Phenotypes and the Illustrative Case of the Breast Cancer Estrogen Receptor. American Journal of Public Health 103(1): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuzawa, C.W. and Sweet, E. (2009) Epigenetics and the embodiment of race: Developmental origins of US racial disparities in cardiovascular health. American Journal of Human Biology 21(1): 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Landecker, H. (2011) Food as exposure: Nutritional epigenetics and the new metabolism. Biosocieties 6(2): 167–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lea, T. (2012) Contemporary anthropologies of indigenous Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 41(1): 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lederbogen, F., Kirsch, P., Haddad, L., Streit, F., Tost, H., Schuch, P., Wust, S., Pruessner, J.C., Rietschel, M., Deuschle, M. and Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2011) City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans. Nature 474(7352): 498–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lewontin, R. (1982) Organism and environment. In: H.C. Plotkin (ed.) Learning, Development and Culture. New York: Wiley, pp. 151–170.Google Scholar
  50. Lewontin, R.C. (2000) The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lock, M. (1993) Encounters with Aging: Mythologies of Menopause in Japan and North America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lock, M. (2001) The tempering of medical anthropology: Troubling natural categories. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15(4): 478–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lock, M. (2015) Comprehending the body in the era of the epigenome. Current Anthropology 56(2): 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lock, M. and Nguyen, V.-K. (2017) An Anthropology of Biomedicine (2nd Edition). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Lynch, M. (2013) Ontography: Investigating the production of things, deflating ontology. Social Studies of Science 43(3): 444–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marcus, G.E. (2016) Art (and anthropology) at the world trade organization: Chronicle of an intervention. Ethnos 82: 907–924.Google Scholar
  57. Maron, D.F. (2016) Does our microbiome control us or do we control it? Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-our-microbiome-control-us-or-do-we-control-it/?print=true, accessed 13 January.
  58. Martin, E. (1990) Toward an anthropology of immunology: The body as nation state. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 4(4): 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin, E. (1993) Histories of immune systems. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 17(1): 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McGowan, P.O., Sasaki, A., D’Alessio, A.C., Dymov, S., Labonté, B.B., Szyf, M., Turecki, G. and Meaney, M.J. (2009) Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nature Neuroscience 12(3): 342–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mekhail, K. and Moazed, D. (2010) The nuclear envelope in genome organization, expression and stability. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 11(5): 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Melby, M.K. (2015) Lessons on aging: Hopes and concerns of Japanese women at midlife. Journal of Women & Aging 28: 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Meloni, M. (2016) Political biology: Science and social values in human heredity from eugenics to epigenetics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  64. Meloni, M. and Testa, G. (2014) Scrutinizing the epigenetics revolution. BioSocieties 9: 431–456.Google Scholar
  65. Meloni, M., Williams, S.J. and Martin, P.A. (2016) Biosocial Matters: Rethinking Sociology-Biology Relations in the Twenty-First Century, The Sociological Review Monographs. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Moser, I. (2008). Making Alzheimer’s disease matter. Enacting, interfering and doing politics of nature. Geoforum 39(1): 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nature. (2012) Life stresses. Nature 490(7419): 143.Google Scholar
  69. Nelson, N. (2016) Model homes for model organisms: Intersections of animal welfare and behavioral neuroscience around the environment of the laboratory mouse. BioSocieties 11(1): 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nestler, E.J. (2016) Transgenerational epigenetic contributions to stress responses: Fact or fiction?” PLoS Biology 14(3): e1002426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Niewöhner, J. (2011) Epigenetics: Embedded bodies and the molecularisation of biography and milieu. Biosocieties 6(3):279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Niewöhner, J. (2015) Epigenetics: Localizing biology through co-laboration. New Genetics and Society 34(2): 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Niewöhner, J. (2016) Co-laborative anthropology: crafting reflexivities experimentally. In: J. Jouhki and T. Steel (eds.) Etnologinen tulkinta ja analyysi. Kohti avoimempaa tutkimusprosessia. Helsinki: Ethnos, pp. 81–124.Google Scholar
  74. Ong, A. and Collier, S.J. (2005) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  75. Oyama, S. (2000) The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. 2nd ed, Science and Cultural Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Petryna, A. (2002) Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Pickering, A. (1995) The Mangle of PracticeTime, Agency & Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pickersgill, M., Niewöhner, J., Müller, R., Martin, P. and Cunningham-Burley, S. (2013) Mapping the new molecular landscape: social dimensions of epigenetics. New Genetics and Society 32(4):429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rabinow, P. (2011). The Accompaniment: Assembling the Contemporary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  80. Rabinow, P. and Bennett, G. (2012) Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Richardson, S.S. (2011) Race and IQ in the postgenomic age: The microcephaly case. Biosocieties 6(4): 420–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ripley, W., Ogura, J. and Griffiths, J. (2016) Fukushima: Five years after Japan’s worst nuclear disaster, CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/08/asia/fukushima-five-year-anniversary/index.html.
  83. Roepstorff, A., Niewöhner, J. and Beck, S. (2010) Enculturing brains through patterned practices. Neural Networks 23(8–9): 1051–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sales, V.M., Ferguson-Smith, A.C. and Patti, M.-E. (2017) Epigenetic mechanisms of transmission of metabolic disease across generations. Cell Metabolism 25(3): 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shankman, P. (2009) The Trashing of Margaret Mead: Anatomy of an Anthropological Controversy. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  86. Sørensen, E. (2009) The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Theidon, K. (2012) Intimate Enemies: Violence and Reconciliation in Peru. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  88. Thompson, C. (2005) Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  89. Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge: MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  90. US DoE and HGP. (1996) To know ourselves. Washington: Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  91. van Speybroeck, L. (2000) The organism: A crucial genomic context in molecular epigenetics?. Theory in Biosciences 119(3–4): 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. von Foerster, H. (1962). Bio-logic. In: M.R. Kare, E.E. Bernard (eds.) Biological Prototypes and Synthetic Systems. New York: Plenum Press, 1–12.Google Scholar
  93. Weaver, I.C.G., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F.A., D’Alessio, A.C., Sharma, S., Seckl, J.R., Dymov, S., Szyf, M. and Meaney, M.J. (2004) Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience 7(8): 847–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Woolgar, S. and Lezaun, J. (2013) The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science 43(3): 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of European EthnologyHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.IRI THESysHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Emerita in Social Studies of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations