Advertisement

BioSocieties

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 23–46 | Cite as

Of rats and women: Narratives of motherhood in environmental epigenetics

  • Martha Kenney
  • Ruth MüllerEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Environmental epigenetics is the study of how environmental signals affect gene expression. Within this growing field of molecular biology, experiments on the epigenetic effects of ‘maternal care’ on offspring health have received much scientific and public attention and are often called upon to showcase how environmental epigenetics will create a new understanding of life as inherently ‘biosocial.’ While, on the one hand, this research is exciting and offers possible opportunities for collaboration between molecular biology and the social sciences, it is also necessary to consider its political dimensions. In this paper, we show how commonsense assumptions about sex, gender, sexuality, and class are present in the design, interpretation, and dissemination of experiments on the epigenetic effects of maternal care. As these experiments come to support claims about human motherhood through a dense speculative cross-traffic between epigenetic studies in rodents and psychological and epidemiological studies in humans, current research trends work to illustrate rather than interrogate existing stereotypes about maternal agency and responsibility. With this analysis, we offer a cautionary perspective regarding the potentials and challenges for new forms of collaborative biosocial knowledge practices emerging out of environmental epigenetics.

Keywords

epigenetics biosocial science collaboration feminist science & technology studies gender class 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A first version of this paper was  presented at the workshop “Epigenetics, Society & Gender” at the University of Vienna, June 22, 2012, organized by Sigrid Schmitz, Ruth Müller and Renee Schröder. We gratefully acknowledge the travel support for Martha Kenney that allowed us to start this project, and the inspiring discussions at the workshop. We would further like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editors for their constructive comments that helped improve the article, as well as Martyn Pickersgill and Cornelia Schadler for their valuable feedback during the writing process.

References

  1. Altzinger, W., Lamei, N., Rumplmaier, B., and Schneebaum, A. (2013) Intergenerationelle soziale Mobilität in Österreich. Statistische Nachrichten 68(1): 48–62.Google Scholar
  2. Balmer, A.S. et al (2015) Taking roles in interdisciplinary collaborations: Reflections on working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community. Science & Technology Studies 28(3): 3–25.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, J. et al (2007) Family rearing antecedents of pubertal timing. Child Development 78(4): 1302–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boero, N. (2009) Fat kids, working moms, and the “epidemic of obesity”: Race, class, and mother-blame. In: E. Rothblum and S. Solovay (eds.) The Fat Studies Reader. New York: New York University Press, pp. 113–120.Google Scholar
  5. Buchen, L. (2010) Neuroscience: In their Nurture. Nature 467(7312): 146–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buffone, S. (2012) Towards an integrative theory of crime and delinquency: Re-conceptualizing the Farrington theory. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 5(2): 895–911.Google Scholar
  7. Bukodi, E., Goldthorpe, J.H., Waller, L., and Kuha, J. (2015) The mobility problem in Britain: New findings from the analysis of birth cohort data. The British Journal of Sociology 66(1): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullard, R.D. (2011) Confronting environmental racism in the 21st century. In: A.H. Deming and L.E. Savoy (eds.) The Colors of Nature: Culture, Identity, and the Natural World. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.Google Scholar
  9. Caldji, C., Diorio, J., and Meaney, M.J. (2000) Variations in maternal care in infancy regulate the development of stress reactivity. Biological Psychiatry 48(12): 1164–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron, N.M., Champagne, F.A., Parent, C., Fish, E.W., Ozaki-Kuroda, K., and Meaney, M.J. (2005) The programming of individual differences in defensive responses and reproductive strategies in the rat through variations in maternal care. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 29(4–5): 843–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron, N.M., Shahrokh, D., Del Corpo, A., Dhir, S.K., Szyf, M., Champagne, F.A., and Meaney, M.J. (2008) Epigenetic programming of phenotypic variations in reproductive strategies in the rat through maternal care. J Neuroendocrinol 20(6): 795–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Champagne, F.A., Francis, D.D., Mar, A., and Meaney, M.J. (2003) Variations in maternal care in the rat as a mediating influence for the effects of environment on development. Physiology & Behavior 79(3): 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Champagne, F.A. and Meaney, M.J. (2006) Stress during gestation alters postpartum maternal care and the development of the offspring in a rodent model. Biological Psychiatry 59(12): 1227–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, P.H. (1999) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Darling, K.W., Ackerman, S.L., Hiatt, R.H., Lee, S.S.-J., and Shim, J.K. (2016) Enacting the molecular imperative: How gene-environment interaction research links bodies and environments in the post-genomic age. Social Science & Medicine 155: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, A.Y. (1990) Women, Culture & Politics. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  17. Farrington, D.P., Gallagher, B., Morley, L., St Ledger, R.J., and West, D.J. (1988) Are there any successful men from criminogenic backgrounds? Psychiatry 51(2): 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000) Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Fine, C. (2010) Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  20. Fitzgerald, D. and Callard, F. (2015) Social science and neuroscience beyond interdisciplinarity: Experimental entanglements. Theory, Culture & Society 32(1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fitzgerald, D., Rose, N., and Singh, I. (2014) Urban life and mental health: Re-visiting politics, society and biology. Discover Society, 13 January 2016, 2014.Google Scholar
  22. Fleck, L. (1979 (1935)) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fox Keller, E. (1983) A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  24. Fox Keller, E. (1995) Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth Century Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gluckman, P.D., Hanson, M.A., Buklijas, T., Low, F.M., and Beedle, A.S. (2009) Epigenetic mechanisms that underpin metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 5(7): 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haapasalo, J. and Tremblay, R.E. (1994) Physically aggressive boys from ages 6 to 12: Family background, parenting behavior, and prediction of delinquency. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62(5): 1044–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haraway, D.J. (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haraway, D.J. (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Haraway, D.J. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_Oncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hedlund, M. (2012) Epigenetic responsibility. Medicine Studies 3(3): 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubbard, R. (1979) Have only men evolved? In: B. Fried, R. Hubbard, and M.S. Henifin (eds.) Women Look at Biology Looking at Women. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  32. Kuzawa, C.W. and Sweet, E. (2009) Epigenetics and the embodiment of race: Developmental origins of US racial disparities in cardiovascular health. American Journal of Human Biology 21(1): 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landecker, H. (2011) Food as exposure: Nutritional epigenetics and the new metabolism. BioSocieties 6(2): 167–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landecker, H. and Panofsky, A. (2013) From social structure to gene regulation, and back: A critical introduction to environmental epigenetics for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 39(1): 333–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loi, M., Del Savio, L., and Stupka, E. (2013) Social epigenetics and equality of opportunity. Public Health Ethics 6(2): 142–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maher, J., Fraser, S., and Wright, J. (2010) Framing the mother: Childhood obesity, maternal responsibility and care. Journal of Gender Studies 19(3): 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mansfield, B. (2012) Race and the new epigenetic biopolitics of environmental health. BioSocieties 7(4): 352–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGowan, P.O. and Szyf, M. (2010) The epigenetics of social adversity in early life: Implications for mental health outcomes. Neurobiology of Disease 39(1): 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meaney, M.J. (2001) Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24(1): 1161–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meaney, M.J. (2004) The nature of nurture: Maternal effects and chromatin remodeling. In: J.T. Cacioppo and G.G. Berntson (eds.) Essays in Social Neuroscience: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  41. Meaney, M.J. (2010) Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene × environment interactions. Child Development 81(1): 41–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meaney, M.J., Liebowitz, M.L., and David Leonardo, E. (2015) Neurobiology of Anxiety Disorders. In: A. Tasman, J. Kay, J.A. Lieberman, M.B. First, and M. Riba (eds.) Psychiatry, 4th ed. West Sussex: Wiley, pp. 320–340.Google Scholar
  43. Meaney, M.J., Szyf, M., and Seckl, J.R. (2007) Epigenetic mechanisms of perinatal programming of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function and health. Trends in Molecular Medicine 13(7): 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meloni, M. (2013) Biology without biologism: Social theory in a postgenomic age. Sociology 48(4): 731–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meloni, M. (2015) Epigenetics for the social sciences: justice, embodiment, and inheritance in the postgenomic age. New Genetics and Society 34(2): 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meloni, M. and Testa, G. (2014) Scrutinizing the epigenetics revolution. BioSocieties 9(4): 431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moynihan, D.P. (1965) The Negro Family: The Case for National Action. Washington, D.C.: Office of policy planning and research. United States department of labor.Google Scholar
  48. Müller, R. (2014) Racing for what? Anticipation and acceleration in the work and career practices of academic life science postdocs. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 15(3): http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1403150.
  49. Müller, R. (forthcoming) Biological determinism in the age of epigenetics: From genetic to environmental. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  50. Nguyen, H.B., Bagot, R.C., Diorio, J., Wong, T.P., and Meaney, M.J. (2015) Maternal care differentially affects neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity in the dorsal and ventral hippocampus. Neuropsychopharmacology 40(7): 1590–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Niewöhner, J. (2011) Epigenetics: Embedded bodies and the molecularisation of biography and milieu. BioSocieties 6(3): 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Niewöhner, J. (2015) Epigenetics: Localizing biology through co-laboration. New Genetics and Society 34(2): 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oudshoorn, N. (1994) Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex Hormones. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pickersgill, M. (2014) Neuroscience, epigenetics and the intergenerational transmission of social life: Exploring expectations and engagements. Families, Relationships and Societies 3(3): 481–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pickersgill, M. (2016) Epistemic modesty, ostentatiousness and the uncertainties of epigenetics: On the knowledge machinery of (social) science. The Sociological Review Monographs 64: 186–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pickersgill, M., Niewohner, J., Muller, R., Martin, P., and Cunningham-Burley, S. (2013) Mapping the new molecular landscape: Social dimensions of epigenetics. New Genetics and Society 32(4): 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41(1): 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reardon, J., Metcalf, J., Kenney, M., and Barad, K. (2015) Science and justice: The trouble and the promise. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 1(1): http://catalystjournal.org/ojs/index.php/catalyst/article/view/reardon_metcalf_kenney_barad.
  59. Reardon, S. (2015) Poverty shrinks brains from birth. Nature News, 30 March, 2015; doi:  10.1038/nature.2015.17227.
  60. Rice, S. (2007) The Encyclopedia of Evolution. New York: Facts On File.Google Scholar
  61. Richardson, S.S. (2013) Sex Itself: The Search for Male and Female in the Human Genome. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Richardson, S.S. (2015) Maternal bodies in the postgenomic order: Gender and the explanatory landscape of epigenetics. In: S.S. Richardson and H. Stevens (eds.) Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Richardson, S.S., Daniels, C.R., Gillman, M.W., Golden, J., Kukla, R., Kuzawa, C., and Rich-Edwards, J. (2014) Don’t blame the mothers. Nature 512: 131–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roberts, D.E. (1997) Killing The Black Body: Race, Reproduction, And The Meaning Of Liberty. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  65. Rose, N. (2013) The human sciences in a biological age. Theory, Culture & Society 30(1): 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rose, S. (2009) Darwin 200: Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit. Nature 457(7231): 786–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Roughgarden, J. (2004) Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  68. Roughgarden, J. (2009) The Genial Gene: Deconstructing Darwinian Selfishness. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
  69. Schiebinger, L. (1993) Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  70. Singh, I. (2012) Human development, nature and nurture: Working beyond the divide. BioSocieties 7(3): 308–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spade, D. (2011) Laws as tactics. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 21(2): 40–71.Google Scholar
  72. Stern, A. (2005) Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America, 2nd ed. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  73. Stotz, K. and Griffiths, P.E. (2008) Biohumanities: Rethinking the relationship between biosciences, philosophy and history of science, and society. The Quarterly Review of Biology 83(1): 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Szyf, M., Weaver, I.C.G., Champagne, F.A., Diorio, J., and Meaney, M.J. (2005) Maternal programming of steroid receptor expression and phenotype through DNA methylation in the rat. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 26(3–4): 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vicedo, M. (2013) The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Viseu, A. (2015) Caring for nanotechnology? Being an integrated social scientist. Social Studies of Science 45(5): 642–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weaver, I.C.G. et al (2004) Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience 7(8): 847–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wells, J.C. (2010) Maternal capital and the metabolic ghetto: An evolutionary perspective on the transgenerational basis of health inequalities. American Journal of Human Biology 22(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhang, T.-Y. et al (2006) Maternal programming of defensive responses through sustained effects on gene expression. Biological Psychology 73(1): 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhang, T.-Y., Parent, C., Weaver, I.A.N., and Meaney, M.J. (2004) Maternal programming of individual differences in defensive responses in the rat. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1032(1): 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Women and Gender StudiesSan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Munich Center for Technology in Society (MCTS)Technical University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations