Advertisement

Organizational slack and innovativeness: the moderating role of institutional transition in the Asian financial crisis

  • Saehwa HongEmail author
  • Hyung-Deok Shin
Original Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Research has suggested that organizational slack can positively or negatively affect the innovativeness of a firm; however, the point at which such slack has a more salient impact remains unclear. This study adds to the literature by highlighting how the effects of organizational slack may differ depending on institutional environments, a market-oriented or a government-driven institutional environment. We posit an inverted U-shaped relationship between organizational slack and innovati`veness. We further hypothesize that institutional environments moderate this relationship. We find broad support for these arguments in a comprehensive data set representing South Korean manufacturing firms from 1992 to 2009.

Keywords

Organizational slack Innovativeness Institutional change 

Notes

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly,50(3), 329–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Konsynski, B. R. (1999). Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science,45(7), 1008–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourgeois, L. J., III. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review,6(1), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, S. W., Aldrich, H., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011a). Resources, environmental change, and survival: Asymmetric paths of young independent and subsidiary organizations. Strategic Management Journal,32(5), 486–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley, S. W., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011b). The importance of slack for new organizations facing ‘tough’environments. Journal of Management Studies,48(5), 1071–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley, S. W., Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011c). Swinging a double-edged sword: The effect of slack on entrepreneurial management and growth. Journal of Business Venturing,26(5), 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, J., Cho, Y. J., & Shin, H. H. (2007). The change in corporate transparency of Korean firms after the Asian financial crisis: An analysis using analysts’ forecast data. Corporate Governance: An International Review,15(6), 1144–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal,43(3), 429–448.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, S. J., & Rhee, J. H. (2011). Rapid FDI expansion and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies,42(8), 979–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chari, M. D., & Chang, K. (2009). Determinants of the share of equity sought in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies,40(8), 1277–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chari, M. D., Devaraj, S., & David, P. (2007). International diversification and firm performance: Role of information technology investments. Journal of World Business,42(2), 184–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng, J. L., & Kesner, I. F. (1997). Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: The impact of resource allocation patterns. Journal of Management,23(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi, J. J., Park, S. W., & Yoo, S. S. (2007). The value of outside directors: Evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,42(4), 941–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choi, Y. R., Yoshikawa, T., Zahra, S. A., & Han, B. H. (2014). Market-oriented institutional change and R&D investments: Do business groups enhance advantage? Journal of World Business,49(4), 466–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal,32(8), 797–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ,2, 169–187.Google Scholar
  18. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. The Journal of Finance,52(1), 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feldman, E. R., Amit, R. R., & Villalonga, B. (2016). Corporate divestitures and family control. Strategic Management Journal,37(3), 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. (2012). The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. The Academy of Management Annals,6(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gentry, R. J., & Shen, W. (2013). The impacts of performance relative to analyst forecasts and analyst coverage on firm R&D intensity. Strategic Management Journal,34(1), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. George, G. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal,48(4), 661–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review,21(4), 1022–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal,46(6), 685–702.Google Scholar
  25. Guler, I., & Guillén, M. F. (2010). Institutions and the internationalization of US venture capital firms. Journal of International Business Studies,41(2), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy,32(8), 1365–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henisz, W. J., Zelner, B. A., & Guillén, M. F. (2005). The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review,70(6), 871–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal,42(4), 351–371.Google Scholar
  29. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review,76(2), 323–329.Google Scholar
  30. Jun, I., Sheldon, P., & Rhee, J. (2010). Business groups and regulatory institutions: Korea’s chaebols, cross-company shareholding and the East Asian crisis. Asian Business & Management,9(4), 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics,112(1), 169–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaul, A. (2012). Technology and corporate scope: Firm and rival innovation as antecedents of corporate transactions. Strategic Management Journal,33(4), 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, H., Kim, H., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2010). Does market-oriented institutional change in an emerging economy make business-group-affiliated multinationals perform better? An institution-based view. Journal of International Business Studies,41(7), 1141–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim, H., Kim, H., & Lee, P. M. (2008). Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organization Science,19(3), 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organization Science,12(5), 632–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laeven, L. (2003). Does financial liberalization reduce financing constraints? Financial Management 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larrañeta, B., Zahra, S. A., & Galán González, J. L. (2014). Strategic repertoire variety and new venture growth: The moderating effects of origin and industry dynamism. Strategic Management Journal,35(5), 761–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mathews, J. A. (1998). Fashioning a new Korean model out of the crisis: The rebuilding of institutional capabilities. Cambridge Journal of Economics,22(6), 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Minton, B. A., & Schrand, C. (1999). The impact of cash flow volatility on discretionary investment and the costs of debt and equity financing. Journal of Financial Economics,54(3), 423–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2011). Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model. Research Policy,40(3), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Natividad, G. (2013). Financial slack, strategy, and competition in movie distribution. Organization Science,24(3), 846–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Newman, K. L. (2000). Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review,25(3), 602–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal,39(5), 1245–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics,2(4), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Brien, J. P. (2003). The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management Journal,24(5), 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics,52(1), 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Park, C., & Kim, S. (2008). Corporate governance, regulatory changes, and corporate restructuring in Korea, 1993–2004. Journal of World Business,43(1), 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review,28(2), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies,39(5), 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal,53(4), 890–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Plassmann, F., & Khanna, N. (2007). Assessing the precision of turning point estimates in polynomial regression functions. Econometric Reviews,26(5), 503–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sharfman, M. P., Wolf, G., Chase, R. B., & Tansik, D. A. (1988). Antecedents of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review,13(4), 601–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal,29(3), 562–585.Google Scholar
  56. Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal,24(13), 1249–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thompson, S. B. (2011). Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. Journal of Financial Economics,99(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V., & Paeleman, I. (2013). The relationship between slack resources and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: The role of venture capital and angel investors. Journal of Management Studies,50(6), 1070–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V., & Zahra, S. A. (2017). Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms. Strategic Management Journal,38(6), 1305–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmentalthreat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal,51(1), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang, P., Van De Vrande, V., & Jansen, J. J. (2017). Balancing exploration and exploitation in inventions: Quality of inventions and team composition. Research Policy,46(10), 1836–1850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  63. Yoo, T., & Rhee, M. (2013). Agency theory and the context for R&D investment: Evidence from Korea. Asian Business & Management,12(2), 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yuan, X., Shin, S., He, X., & Kim, S. Y. (2016). Innovation capability, marketing capability and firm performance: A two-nation study of China and Korea. Asian Business & Management,15(1), 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang, Y., Li, H., Hitt, M. A., & Cui, G. (2007). R&D intensity and international joint venture performance in an emerging market: Moderating effects of market focus and ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies,38(6), 944–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationKutztown University of PennsylvaniaKutztownUSA
  2. 2.School of Business AdministrationHongik UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations