Unions and the productivity performance of multinational enterprises: evidence from China
- 34 Downloads
This paper uses the economic census data of multinational enterprises (MNEs) in the Chinese manufacturing industry to investigate the effects of Chinese unions on firm productivity. We show that Chinese unions have a significant “collective voice” effect by participating in a wide range of decision-making and production-related activities. The empirical evidence suggests that the presence of Chinese unions in MNEs is positively associated with enterprise productivity. We also find that the union productivity effects are stronger in MNEs than those in domestic private firms and that the effectiveness of unions is more significant in skill-intensive industries.
KeywordsMultinational enterprises Unions Productivity China
This paper is funded by China Social Science Foundation Grant (17BSH076), Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Grant (890-2016-4023), and Stephen Jarislowsky Foundation Research Grant (Dr. Tony Fang) and Western Sydney University Academic Development Program Funding 2018, Western Sydney University School of Business Professional Development Funding 2017 (Dr. Youqing Fan), and National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 71433002) (Dr. Ying Ge).
- Clark, K. B. (1984). Unionization and firm performance: The impact on profits, growth, and productivity. American Economic Review, 74, 893–919.Google Scholar
- Doucouliagos, C., & Laroche, P. (2003). What do unions do to productivity? A meta-analysis. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(4), 650–691.Google Scholar
- Fan, Y. (2012). Union revitalization in the Chinese context? An evaluation of unions in the post-reform era. Unpublished PhD manuscript, Department of Management, Monash University, Australia.Google Scholar
- Fan, Y. & Gahan, P. (2012). What are Chinese unions doing? Explaining innovation & change in grassroots unions. SSRN Working paper, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2113221.
- Fox, A. (1966). Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employer Association. Industrial Sociology and Industrial Relations, Research Paper 3. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.Google Scholar
- Fox, A. (1974). Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relationships. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. (1984). What do unions do?. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, B. T. (2007). What do unions do for economic performance? In J. T. Bennett & B. E. Kaufman (Eds.), What do unions do? A twenty-year perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kaufman, B. E. (2004). What do unions do? A twenty-year perspective (pp. 193–237). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Marchington, M., & Wilkinson, A. (2005). Direct participation and involvement. In S. Bach (Ed.), Managing human resources (4th ed., pp. 398–423). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Muramatsu, K. (1984). The effect of trade unions on productivity in Japanese manufacturing industries. In M. Aoki (Ed.), The economic analysis of the Japanese firm (pp. 103–123). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- NBSC. (2006). China economic census yearbook, national bureau of statistics of China. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, B., Chang, K., & Li, Q. (2003). Industrial relations in China. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, A., Gollan, P., Marchington, M., & Lewin, D. (2010). Conceptualising employee participation in organizations. In A. Wilkinson, P. Gollan, M. Marchington, & D. Lewin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of participation in organizations (pp. 3–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. (2002). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). New York: Cengage Learning Custom Publishing.Google Scholar