Advertisement

URBAN DESIGN International

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 225–240 | Cite as

Mapping stories: representing urban everyday narratives and operations

  • Paramita AtmodiwirjoEmail author
  • Mikhael Johanes
  • Yandi Andri Yatmo
Original Article
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes the idea of narrative mapping as a way to reveal how urban space operates in an everyday context. It argues that narrative mapping has the potential to capture the particularity of urban living space through interactive digital medium. In particular, this paper presents the development of Mapping Stories—a mapping representation that captures the observed everyday narratives and visualizes them through an interactive digital medium. Drawing on De Certeau’s idea of everyday spatial operation, we developed this mapping as a form of practice that spatializes narratives with its geo-referenced location. It projects the chain of the events occurring in a time–space context, which articulate the everyday narrative to reveal the particularity of urban space. The interactivity of the digital medium allows for the reading and selection of narratives within their time–space contexts instead of enforcing the totalisation of the map into a single narrative. This mapping approach acknowledges the potential of urban spaces as dynamic sites of everyday narratives and operations. It highlights the open-ended nature of urban contexts and suggests their potential for re-appropriation through the more plural and open-minded urban design practice.

Keywords

Digital representation Mapping Narrative Operation Performative Urban 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research was funded by PUPT Research Grant from Indonesian Ministry of Research and Higher Education.

References

  1. Allen, S. 2009. Practice: Architecture technique + representation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Atmodiwirjo, P. 2008. The use of urban public places in Jakarta for adolescents′ hanging out. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 7 (2): 339–346.  https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.7.339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, S.L., C. Phoenix, R. Lovell, and B.W. Wheeler. 2015. Using GPS and geo-narratives: A methodological approach for understanding and situating everyday green space encounters. Area 47 (1): 88–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, W. 1969. The storyteller. In Illuminations, ed. H. Zohn, trans. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  5. Borden, I. 2001. The unknown city: Contesting architecture and social space. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bulkens, M., C. Minca, and H. Muzaini. 2015. Storytelling as method in spatial planning. European Planning Studies 23 (11): 2310–2326.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.942600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caquard, S. 2013. Cartography I: Mapping narrative cartography. Progress in Human Geography 37 (1): 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Childs, M.C. 2008. Storytelling and urban design. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 1 (2): 173–186.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170802221526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coates, N. (ed.). 2012. Narrative architecture. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Cockburn, A., A. Karlson, and B.B. Bederson. 2008. A review of overview + detail, zooming, and focus + context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys 41 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corner, J. 1999. The agency of mapping: Speculation, critique and invention. In Mappings, ed. D. Cosgrove. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  12. Crampton, J.W. 2009. Cartography: Performative, participatory, political. Progress in Human Geography 33 (6): 840–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Certeau, M. 1984. The practice of everyday life (trans: Rendall, S.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dovey, K., and H. Kamalipour. 2018. Informal/formal morphologies. In Mapping urbanities: Morphologies, flows, possibilities, ed. K. Dovey, E. Pafka, and M. Ristic. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  15. Dovey, K., E. Pafka, and M. Ristic. 2017. Mapping urbanities: Morphologies, flows, possibilities. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downs, R.M., and D. Stea. 1973. Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  17. Ewing, R., and O. Clemente. 2013. Measuring urban design: Metrics for liveable places. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Filep, C.V., M. Thompson-Fawcett, and M. Rae. 2014. Built narratives. Journal of Urban Design 19 (3): 298–316.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.890043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedman, S.S. 1993. Spatialization: A strategy for reading narrative. Narrative 1 (1): 12–23.Google Scholar
  20. Gehl, J. 2011. Life between buildings: Using public space. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  21. Havik, K.M. 2012. Urban literacy: A scriptive approach to the experience, use and imagination of place. Delft: TU Delft.Google Scholar
  22. Highmore, B. (ed.). 2002. The everyday life reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hillier, B. 2007. Space is the machine. London: Space Syntax.Google Scholar
  24. Ishizaki, S. 2003. Improvisational design: Continuous, responsive digital communication. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joliveau, T. 2009. Connecting real and imaginary places through geospatial technologies: Examples from set-jetting and art-oriented tourism. The Cartographic Journal 46 (1): 36–45.  https://doi.org/10.1179/000870409X415570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keith, M. 2003. Walter Benjamin, urban studies and the narratives of city life. In A Companion to the city, ed. G. Bridge and S. Watson, 410–429. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolarevic, B., and A. Malkawi (eds.). 2005. Performative architecture: Beyond instrumentality. New York: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kwan, M.-P., and G. Ding. 2008. Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. The Professional Geographer 60 (4): 443–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lam, H., T. Munzner, and R. Kincaid. 2007. Overview use in multiple visual information resolution interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13 (6): 1278–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Latour B., E. Hermant, and P. Reed. 2004. Paris: Invisible City. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/virtual/EN/index.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
  31. Leatherbarrow, D. 2009. Architecture oriented otherwise. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Marušić, B.G. 2011. Analysis of patterns of spatial occupancy in urban open space using behaviour maps and GIS. URBAN DESIGN International 16 (1): 36–50.  https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2010.20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCarthy, T. 2014. It is not down in any map; True places never are. In Mapping it out: An alternative atlas of contemporary cartography, ed. H.U. Obrist, 7–10. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  35. Mulíček, O., and R. Osman. 2018. Rhythm of urban retail landscapes: Shopping hours and the urban chronotopes. Moravian Geographical Reports.  https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2018-0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagel T., J. Klerkx, A.V. Moere, and E. Duval. 2013. Unfolding—A library for interactive maps. In Human factors in computing and informatics, 497–513. Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Neuhaus, F. (ed.). 2011. Studies in temporal urbanism: The urbanTick experiment. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Oliveira, V. 2016. Urban morphology: An introduction to the study of the physical form of cities. Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paramita, K.D., and T. Schneider. 2018. Passage territories: Reframing living spaces in contested contexts. Interiority 1 (2): 113–129.  https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v1i2.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Poplin, A., L. Shenk, C. Krejci, and U. Passe. 2017. Engaging youth through spatial socio-technical storytelling, participatory GIS, agent-based modeling, online geogames and action projects. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences IV-4 (W3): 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reas, C., and B. Fry. 2007. Processing: A programming handbook for visual designers and artists. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sandercock, L. 2003. Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice 4 (1): 11–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000057209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schaick, J.Van. 2011. Timespace matters: Exploring the gap between knowing about activity patterns of people and knowing how to design and plan urban areas and regions. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  44. Till, J. 2009. Architecture depends. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Vaughan, L. 2009. Walking the line: Affectively understanding and communicating the complexity of place. The Cartographic Journal 46 (4): 316–322.  https://doi.org/10.1179/000870409X12541388437132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Virilio, P. 2000. A landscape of events. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Yaneva, A. 2012. Mapping controversies in architecture. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paramita Atmodiwirjo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mikhael Johanes
    • 1
  • Yandi Andri Yatmo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Faculty of EngineeringUniversitas IndonesiaDepokIndonesia

Personalised recommendations