Advertisement

URBAN DESIGN International

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 271–279 | Cite as

Enhancing cultural aspirations in urban design: the gradual transformation by Indigenous innovation

  • Michelle Thompson-FawcettEmail author
  • Alex Kitson
  • Janice Barry
Original Article

Abstract

In the paper, we address the need to make visible the presence of Indigenous groups in the built environment that has developed on their traditional territories. We examine two recent approaches that have been used in Aotearoa New Zealand to manifest Indigenous histories and values in the city of Ōtautahi|Christchurch. The first involves the Indigenous group acting as urban developer. The second exemplifies Indigenous integration into local urban design decision-making processes. The result of both approaches is a significant urban transformation whereby Indigenous cultural aspirations are given voice in the city.

Keywords

Indigenous urban design Identity and belonging Inclusive design Design partnership Aotearoa New Zealand 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the provision of an Insight Development Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada which enabled this research.

References

  1. Durie, M.H. 1998. Te Mana, Te Kāwanatanga: The Politics of Self Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Harvie, W. 2016. How Maori will rebuilt Christchurch look? The Press. 24 September. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/the-rebuild/84195996/how-maori-will-rebuilt-christchurch-look.
  3. Keene, H. 2013. Future Vision. Te Karaka. 20 July. Retrieved from http://ngaitahu.iwi.nz/our_stories/future-vision/.
  4. Matunga, H. 2013. Theorizing Indigenous Planning. In Reclaiming Indigenous Planning, ed. R. Walker, T. Jojola, and D. Natcher, 3–32. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ngāi Tahu Property. (n.d.) Ngāi Tahu Property. Retrieved from http://ngaitahu.iwi.nz/investment/ngai-tahu-property/.
  6. Ngāi Tahu Property. 2015. Cultural Artwork at The Landing. 29 October. Retrieved from http://wigramskies.co.nz/news/61-cultural-artwork-at-the-landing.
  7. O’Faircheallaigh, C. 2010. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30 (1): 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pauling, C., S. Awatere, and S. Rolleston. 2017. What has Ōtautahi revealed? Māori urban planning in post-earthquake Christchurch, unpublished report.Google Scholar
  9. Puketapu-Dentice, K., S. Connelly, and M. Thompson-Fawcett. 2017. Towards integrating indigenous culture in urban form. Justice Spatiale|Spatial Justice 11 (6): 1–19.Google Scholar
  10. Sewell, A. 2014. Brief of Evidence (Submitter 806), Proposed Christchurch Replacement Plan, Chapter 3: Strategic Directions. Retrieved from http://www.chchplan.ihp.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Evidence_064_Ngai_Tahu_Property_Limited_and_Te_Runanga_o_Ngai_Tahu_Tony_Sewell.pdf.
  11. Stuart, K., and M. Thompson-Fawcett (eds.). 2010. Taone Tupu Ora: Indigenous knowledge and sustainable urban design. Wellington: Steele Roberts Press.Google Scholar
  12. Thompson-Fawcett, M., L. Rona, and H. Rae. 2017. Taiao Toitū: Māori and Planning. In Planning Practice in New Zealand, ed. L. Beattie and C. Miller, 175–188. Auckland: LexisNexis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Thompson-Fawcett
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alex Kitson
    • 1
  • Janice Barry
    • 2
  1. 1.University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations