Advertisement

URBAN DESIGN International

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 60–74 | Cite as

Designing new practices of transformative urbanism: an experiment in Toronto

  • Aseem InamEmail author
Original Article
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

The increasing complexity, rapid change, and often unpredictable outcomes of city-design-and-building processes demand new modes of practice that are responsive and adaptive to the specifics of such changing contexts in the twenty-first century. These include open-ended outcomes, rather than rigid and predictable products, that emerge out of interactions with a specific context, specific communities and specific interactive processes. This article describes how we can design such new practices of transformative urbanism, derived largely—but not exclusively—from the innovation, resourcefulness and collective creativeness of informal urbanisms. To illustrate such new practices of transformative urbanism, the author describes an experiment in the city of Toronto undertaken as a partnership between the residents of the Thorncliffe Park neighborhood and urbanists from the University of Toronto. The article concludes by describing several promising results of the experiment.

Keywords

Urban design Informal urbanisms Transformative urbanism Toronto 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the following University of Toronto scholar-practitioners who contributed to this paper through the brilliant work they carried out in this community collaboration in Thorncliffe Park: Lauren An, Anni Buelles, Kelsey Carriere, Stephanie Cirnu, Aviva Coopersmith, Maria Grandez, Kelly Gregg, Michael Hoelscher, Jonathan Kitchen, Maria Martelo Mesa, Noha Refaat, Mercedes Sharpe Zeyas, Andrew Walker, Louise Willard, Jennifer Williamson, and Frances Woo. The author would also like to thank the guest editor of this special issue of Urban Design International, Dr. Tigran Haas of KTH Royal Institute of Technology, for his gracious invitation and generous support in the writing of this article.

References

  1. Ali, Sabina. 2015. Chair, Thorncliffe Park Women’s Committee, personal communication. Toronto, October 29.Google Scholar
  2. Arefi, Mahyar. 2014. Deconstructing Placemaking: Needs, Opportunities, and Assets. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boo, Katherine. 2012. Behind the Beautiful Forevers: Life, Death, and Hope in a Mumbai Undercity. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Carmona, Matthew. 2015. Re-Theorising Contemporary Public Space: A New Narrative and A New Normative. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 8 (4): 373–405.Google Scholar
  5. Chase, John, Margaret Crawford, and John Kaliski (eds.). 1999. Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.Google Scholar
  6. Haas, Tigran, and Krister Olson (eds.). 2016. Emergent Urbanism: Urban Planning and Design in Times of Structural and Systemic Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hou, Jeffrey (ed.). 2010. Insurgent Public Space: Guerilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Inam, Aseem. 2005. Planning for the Unplanned: Recovering from Crises in Megacities. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Inam, Aseem. 2012. Tensions Manifested: Reading the Viceroy’s House in New Delhi. In Emerging Asia: Concomitant Urbanities and Urbanisms, ed. Vinayak Bharne, 99–109. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Inam, Aseem. 2014. Designing Urban Transformation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Inam, Aseem. 2016. Unveiling Vegas: Urbanism at the Nexus of Private Profit and Public Policy. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 9 (3): 216–236.Google Scholar
  12. Kostof, Spiro. 1991. The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings Through History. London: Bulfinch Press.Google Scholar
  13. Low, Setha. 2016. Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lydon, Mike, and Anthony Garcia (eds.). 2015. Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action for Long-term Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lynch, Kevin. 1981. Good City Form. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Madanipur, Ali (ed.). 2010. Whose Public Space? International Case Studies in Urban Design and Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Metcalf Foundation. 2015. The Power of Civic Action: How the Thorncliffe Park Women’s Committee Revitalized Their Park and Created an Engine of Grassroots Economic Activity. Toronto: Metcalf Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Mukhija, Vinit, and Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris (eds.). 2014. The Informal American City: Beyond Taco Trucks and Day Labor. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Parsons School of Design, The New School, and Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo. 2014. PIER TO PIER LAB: An Interdisciplinary Workshop to Explore the Topic of Informal Urbanisms, final report multimedia report of the workshop in São Paulo. https://piertopierlab.wordpress.com/. Accessed 8 Sept 2017.
  20. Parsons School of Design, The New School, and Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo. 2015. Agents of Public Space, final multimedia report of the workshop in New York. https://agentsofpublicspace.wordpress.com/. Accessed 8 Sept 2017.
  21. Rios, Michael. 2014. Chapter 9: Learning from Informal Practices: Implications for Urban Design. In The Informal American City: Beyond Taco Trucks and Day Labor, eds. Vinit Mukhija, and Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, 173–191. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Roy, Ananya. 2011. Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tonkiss, Fran. 2014. Cities by Design: The Social Life of Urban Form. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. University of Toronto Department of Geography and Planning [UT Planning]. 2016. Building Potential Futures for Thorncliffe Park, final report of the 2015–2016 urban design studio. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  25. Venkatesh, Sudhir. 2013. Floating City: A Rogue Sociologist Lost and Found in New York’s Underground Economy. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TRULAB: Laboratory for Designing Urban TransformationCardiffUK
  2. 2.Welsh School of ArchitectureCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations